Avneesh Gupta1, Richard Tello. 1. Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, 88 E Newton Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA. avgupta@bmc.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It has been hypothesized that accessory renal arteries are related to the risk of hypertension. Our goal was to determine the prevalence of accessory renal arteries in hypertensive patients using MR angiography and to assess the relationship between accessory renal arteries and hypertension risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1996 to 2002, 185 hypertensive patients underwent MR angiography of the renal arteries at our institution for assessment of renal artery stenosis. MR angiograms were obtained using a 1.5-T magnet, IV gadolinium, and 3D gradient-echo sequences. Interpretations of the MR angiograms were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of 185 hypertensive patients, 45 (24%) showed accessory renal arteries. Of these 45 patients, nine (20%) showed renal artery stenosis and 36 (80%) showed no significant stenosis. Of the 140 patients with a single renal artery, 42 (30%) showed renal artery stenosis and 98 (70%) showed no stenosis. The odds ratio of renal artery stenosis in the accessory renal artery group versus the single renal artery group was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.3%), which is not statistically significant at a power of 0.85 (chi(2) = 1.705; p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of renal artery stenosis between patients with accessory renal arteries and those without accessory renal arteries. Assuming that the presence of two separate causes of hypertension in the same patient would be unlikely, this finding implies that accessory renal arteries are a vascular anomaly and not a direct cause of hypertension. The findings are potentially relevant in refuting the theory of accessory renal arteries as an anatomically treatable cause of hypertension.
OBJECTIVE: It has been hypothesized that accessory renal arteries are related to the risk of hypertension. Our goal was to determine the prevalence of accessory renal arteries in hypertensivepatients using MR angiography and to assess the relationship between accessory renal arteries and hypertension risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1996 to 2002, 185 hypertensivepatients underwent MR angiography of the renal arteries at our institution for assessment of renal artery stenosis. MR angiograms were obtained using a 1.5-T magnet, IV gadolinium, and 3D gradient-echo sequences. Interpretations of the MR angiograms were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Of 185 hypertensivepatients, 45 (24%) showed accessory renal arteries. Of these 45 patients, nine (20%) showed renal artery stenosis and 36 (80%) showed no significant stenosis. Of the 140 patients with a single renal artery, 42 (30%) showed renal artery stenosis and 98 (70%) showed no stenosis. The odds ratio of renal artery stenosis in the accessory renal artery group versus the single renal artery group was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.3%), which is not statistically significant at a power of 0.85 (chi(2) = 1.705; p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of renal artery stenosis between patients with accessory renal arteries and those without accessory renal arteries. Assuming that the presence of two separate causes of hypertension in the same patient would be unlikely, this finding implies that accessory renal arteries are a vascular anomaly and not a direct cause of hypertension. The findings are potentially relevant in refuting the theory of accessory renal arteries as an anatomically treatable cause of hypertension.
Authors: Enrique Ponce de Leon-Martinez; Javier A Garza; Jose R Azpiri-Lopez; Krista N Dillon; Leonel Olivas Salazar; Francisco Canepa-Campos; Serge D Rousselle; Armando Tellez Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2015-05-27
Authors: Lucas Lauder; Sebastian Ewen; Abraham Rami Tzafriri; Elazer Reuven Edelman; Thomas Felix Lüscher; Peter J Blankenstijn; Oliver Dörr; Markus Schlaich; Faisal Sharif; Michiel Voskuil; Thomas Zeller; Christian Ukena; Bruno Scheller; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2018-05-20 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Frank Himmel; Frank Bode; Kai Mortensen; Michael Reppel; Klaas Franzen; Heribert Schunkert; Joachim Weil Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 3.738