Jose L Mattos1, Rodney J Schlosser1,2, Adam S DeConde3, Madison Hyer4, Jess C Mace5, Timothy L Smith5, Zachary M Soler1. 1. Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 2. Department of Surgery, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC. 3. Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA. 4. Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 5. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olfactory-specific quality of life (QOL) can be measured using the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS), which examines various aspects of olfactory dysfunction. It is unknown if certain factors of the QOD-NS differentially impact QOL. METHODS: Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) completed the QOD-NS, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6-D (SF-6D) health utility measure, and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) depression screen. Exploratory factor analysis of the QOD-NS was performed. Associations between QOD-NS factors and other QOL metrics were analyzed before and after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). RESULTS: Outcomes were examined on 132 patients. The QOD-NS contains 4 distinct factors. There was no difference in associations between the different factors and baseline clinical characteristics. ESS had greatest effect size (d) on factors 2 and 4 (d = 0.29 and 0.27, respectively, p < 0.05). Postsurgical changes in the SF-6D and SNOT-22 had the strongest correlation with factor 2 scores (r = 0.29 and 0.34, respectively, p < 0.05), and changes in the PHQ-2 had the strongest correlation to factor 3 (r = 0.24, p < 0.05). Abnormal QOD-NS scores at baseline were associated with effect size increases of 50% to 100% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The QOD-NS measures 4 distinct factors. Eating-related questions had the greatest improvement after ESS. Health utility and CRS-specific QOL improvement most strongly associated with factor 2, while PHQ-2 changes are most highly associated with factor 3, suggesting a differential impact of the factors of the QOD-NS on varying aspects of QOL.
BACKGROUND: Olfactory-specific quality of life (QOL) can be measured using the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS), which examines various aspects of olfactory dysfunction. It is unknown if certain factors of the QOD-NS differentially impact QOL. METHODS:Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) completed the QOD-NS, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6-D (SF-6D) health utility measure, and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) depression screen. Exploratory factor analysis of the QOD-NS was performed. Associations between QOD-NS factors and other QOL metrics were analyzed before and after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). RESULTS: Outcomes were examined on 132 patients. The QOD-NS contains 4 distinct factors. There was no difference in associations between the different factors and baseline clinical characteristics. ESS had greatest effect size (d) on factors 2 and 4 (d = 0.29 and 0.27, respectively, p < 0.05). Postsurgical changes in the SF-6D and SNOT-22 had the strongest correlation with factor 2 scores (r = 0.29 and 0.34, respectively, p < 0.05), and changes in the PHQ-2 had the strongest correlation to factor 3 (r = 0.24, p < 0.05). Abnormal QOD-NS scores at baseline were associated with effect size increases of 50% to 100% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The QOD-NS measures 4 distinct factors. Eating-related questions had the greatest improvement after ESS. Health utility and CRS-specific QOL improvement most strongly associated with factor 2, while PHQ-2 changes are most highly associated with factor 3, suggesting a differential impact of the factors of the QOD-NS on varying aspects of QOL.
Authors: Richard M Rosenfeld; Jay F Piccirillo; Sujana S Chandrasekhar; Itzhak Brook; Kaparaboyna Ashok Kumar; Maggie Kramper; Richard R Orlandi; James N Palmer; Zara M Patel; Anju Peters; Sandra A Walsh; Maureen D Corrigan Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Zachary M Soler; Timothy L Smith; Jeremiah A Alt; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Jess C Mace; Rodney J Schlosser Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Jose L Mattos; Campbell Edwards; Rodney J Schlosser; Madison Hyer; Jess C Mace; Timothy L Smith; Zachary M Soler Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Jose L Mattos; Todd E Bodner; Jess C Mace; Rodney J Schlosser; Daniel M Beswick; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Jeremiah A Alt; Spencer C Payne; Timothy L Smith; Zachary M Soler Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2021-04-17 Impact factor: 5.426
Authors: David T Liu; Bernhard Prem; Gunjan Sharma; Julia Kaiser; Gerold Besser; Christian A Mueller Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 2.970