Literature DB >> 29633186

Enhanced recovery after surgery in gastric cancer: which are the main achievements from the Italian experience?

Uberto Fumagalli Romario1, Jacopo Weindelmayer2, Andrea Coratti3, Andrea Cossu4, Luca Gianotti5, Stefano Rausei6, Andrea Sansonetti7, Stefano De Pascale8.   

Abstract

In the last years, the concept of 'enhanced recovery after surgery' (ERAS) has become a routine in the perioperative care of patients undergoing colorectal resection. The application of ERAS programs in gastric surgery had a more difficult penetration into clinical practice, mainly for the introduction of radical changes in the traditional postoperative management. The aim of the study was to analyze the rate of compliance to a standardized ERAS protocol in different Italian centers and evaluate the results in terms of postoperative outcomes. From April 2015 to July 2017, a prospective observational study was conducted among seven centers participating in the Italian Group for Research for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG), in patient candidates to elective gastrectomy for cancer. A standardized ERAS perioperative protocol was approved by all centers. Compliance to the protocol was then evaluated and postoperative outcomes (morbidity and mortality rate, duration of hospital stay and readmission rate) were analyzed. Two-hundred and seventy unselected patients operated on for gastric cancer were enrolled. The median age was 73 years; 40.4% of patients were female; 24.1% had a nutritional risk score ≥ 3. Perioperative chemotherapy was used in 23.7% of cases. Total gastrectomy was performed in 57.4% of patients; minimally invasive approach was adopted in 28.1% of patients. Adherence to the protocol varied between 23 and 88% for single items. It was quite low for pre- and intraoperative items, mainly for items related to nutritional care. Postoperative complications occurred in 35.5% of patients, mortality was 0.7%. Median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range 4-72) and the readmission rate was 6.3%. There is a growing attention on the implementation of ERAS protocol for gastric cancer surgery, but several elements of this protocol are still not routinely adopted, among them items regarding nutritional care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced recovery after surgery; Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29633186     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0522-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  26 in total

1.  Complications after gastrectomy for cancer: Italian perspective.

Authors:  Gian Luca Baiocchi; Simone Giacopuzzi; Daniele Marrelli; Maria Bencivenga; Paolo Morgagni; Fausto Rosa; Mattia Berselli; Elena Orsenigo; Ferdinando Cananzi; Guido Tiberio; Stefano Rausei; Luca Cozzaglio; Maurizio Degiuli; Alberto Di Leo; Uberto Fumagalli; Nazario Portolani; Riccardo Rosati; Franco Roviello; Giovanni De Manzoni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-07-14

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Andrew James Beamish; David Sheng Yi Chan; Paul A Blake; Alexandra Karran; Wyn Griffith Lewis
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Olle Ljungqvist; Michael Scott; Kenneth C Fearon
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Comparison of respiratory function recovery in the early phase after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hideki Kawamura; Ryoichi Yokota; Shigenori Homma; Yukifumi Kondo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; P Fayers; J Fielding; J Craven; J Bancewicz; V Joypaul; P Cook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Multimodal optimization of surgical care shows beneficial outcome in gastrectomy surgery.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Liu; Zhi-Wei Jiang; Zhi-Ming Wang; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response after laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy and the effect of inflammatory cytokines on adhesion of gastric cancer cells to peritoneal mesothelial cells.

Authors:  Ge Yu; Bo Tang; Pei-Wu Yu; Zhi-Hong Peng; Feng Qian; Gang Sun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  [Clinical significance of a standardized clinical pathway in gastrectomy patients].

Authors:  Teruo Kiyama; Takashi Tajiri; Toshiro Yoshiyuki; Kyoko Mitsuhashi; Yuya Ise; Takashi Mizutani; Takeshi Okuda; Itsuro Fujita; Gotaro Masuda; Shunji Kato; Norio Matsukura; Akira Tokunaga; Sachiko Hasegawa
Journal:  J Nippon Med Sch       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 0.920

9.  [The safety and efficiency of fast track surgery in gastric cancer patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy].

Authors:  Zhi-wei Jiang; Jie-shou Li; Zhi-ming Wang; Ning Li; Xin-xin Liu; Wei-yan Li; Si-hai Zhu; Yan-qing Diao; Yong-jun Nai; Xiao-jing Huang
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2007-10-01

10.  Preliminary experience of fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jin Chen Hu; Li Xin Jiang; Li Cai; Hai Tao Zheng; San Yuan Hu; Hong Bing Chen; Guo Chang Wu; Yi Fei Zhang; Zhong Chuan Lv
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  1 in total

1.  ERAS pathway for gastric cancer surgery: adherence, outcomes and prognostic factors for compliance in a Western centre.

Authors:  Pietro Maria Lombardi; Michele Mazzola; Alessandro Giani; Sara Baleri; Marianna Maspero; Paolo De Martini; Monica Gualtierotti; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.