Literature DB >> 20467014

Multimodal optimization of surgical care shows beneficial outcome in gastrectomy surgery.

Xin-Xin Liu1, Zhi-Wei Jiang, Zhi-Ming Wang, Jie-Shou Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this trial was to compare multimodal optimization with conventional perioperative management in a consecutive series of patients undergoing gastrectomy procedures.
METHODS: According to randomized controlled studies and conclusions made by meta-analyses in colorectal surgery, optimized perioperative measures were designed and applied in gastrectomy surgery. Thirty-three patients were randomized to the optimized group and 30 patients to a control group. Two groups were treated in 1 center by a single surgical team in different wards. Both groups used patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative analgesia. The primary end point was length of postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included bowel function recovery after surgery, perioperative changes of inflammatory factors, glucocorticoid, insulin resistance, and body composition. Perioperative complications and adverse events were also recorded.
RESULTS: The groups were similar in terms of age, sex ratio, and Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM score). The optimized group was associated with a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay compared with the conventional care group (P < .001). Durations of urinary catheterization and abdominal drainage were also less (P < .001). The diet program in the optimization group was well tolerated and was associated with an earlier recovery of gut function (P < .001). Proinflammatory factors were less elevated and body composition was more stable in the optimized group than in controls. There were no differences in morbidity or mortality between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of care in gastrectomy can shorten postoperative hospital stay and provides multiple beneficial outcomes, including hastening the return of gut function, without increasing morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20467014     DOI: 10.1177/0148607110362583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  24 in total

1.  A phase II study of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norihiko Sugisawa; Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Yuichiro Miki; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 2.  Fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen Yu; Cheng-Le Zhuang; Xing-Zhao Ye; Chang-Jing Zhang; Qian-Tong Dong; Bi-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Fast-track surgery: procedure-specific aspects and future direction.

Authors:  Daniel Ansari; Luca Gianotti; Jörg Schröder; Roland Andersson
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Fast-track concepts in major open upper abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery: a review.

Authors:  Monika Fagevik Olsén; Elisabet Wennberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  A meta-analysis of fast track surgery for patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.

Authors:  S Chen; Z Zou; F Chen; Z Huang; G Li
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Liu; Zhi-Wei Jiang; Ping Chen; Yan Zhao; Hua-Feng Pan; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Perioperative physiotherapy.

Authors:  Bhakti K Patel; Jesse B Hall
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.706

8.  Propensity Score Analysis of an Enhanced Recovery Programme in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  A Karran; J Wheat; D Chan; P Blake; R Barlow; W G Lewis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs Improve Patient Outcomes and Recovery: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine S M Lau; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Retrospective cohort study of an enhanced recovery programme in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  P A C Gatenby; C Shaw; C Hine; S Scholtes; M Koutra; H Andrew; M Hacking; W H Allum
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.