| Literature DB >> 29632726 |
Jin-Yu Zhang1, Yong-Liang Zhao2, Yi-Pin Lv1, Ping Cheng1, Weisan Chen3, Mubin Duan3, Yong-Sheng Teng1, Ting-Ting Wang1, Liu-Sheng Peng1, Fang-Yuan Mao1, Yu-Gang Liu1, Xiao-Long Fu2, Pei-Wu Yu2, Ping Luo1, Wei-Jun Zhang1, Quan-Ming Zou1, Yuan Zhuang1.
Abstract
The potential contributions of CD8+ memory stem T cells to anti-tumor immunity and immunotherapy responses in gastric cancer has not been demonstrated. We found that CD8+ memory stem T cell frequencies were increased in the peripheral blood of gastric cancer patients compared to healthy donors and declined in frequency with disease progression. Despite minimal in vitro cytotoxic activity, the adoptive transfer of CD8+ memory stem T cells into Rag1-/- tumor bearing mice enhanced tumor regression compared to CD8+ central or effector memory T cell counterparts. This effect was associated with an increase in splenic, draining lymph node and tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cell numbers and the development of an altered CD8+ T cell phenotype not seen during homeostasis. GSK-3β inhibition is known to promote memory stem T cell accumulation by arresting effector T cell differentiation in vivo. Surprisingly however, GSK-3β inhibition conversely increased the cytotoxic capacity of CD8+ memory stem T cells in vitro, and this was associated with the induction of effector T cell-associated effector proteins including FasL. Finally, FasL neutralization following GSK-3β inhibition directly attenuated the anti-tumoral capacity of CD8+ memory stem T cells both in vitro and in vivo. Altogether, our findings identify the therapeutic potential of modulating CD8+ memory stem T cells for improved anti-tumoral responses against gastric cancer.Entities:
Keywords: CD8+ T cells; FasL; GSK-3β; Tscm cells; gastric cancer
Year: 2018 PMID: 29632726 PMCID: PMC5889281 DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1412900
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncoimmunology ISSN: 2162-4011 Impact factor: 8.110
Figure 1.Tscm cells accumulate in peripheral blood of GC patients and decrease with disease progression. A. Flow cytometry analysis of a peripheral blood sample from a GC patient. Dot plots show the gating strategy used to identify Tscm cells. B. Percentages of circulating CD8+ T cell subsets in GC patients compared to healthy donors. C. Percentages of circulating CD8+ T cell subsets from GC patients at all TNM stages. D. Flow cytometry analysis of tumor tissue and non-tumor tissue from a GC patient. E. Percentages of CD8+ T cell subsets in tumor and non-tumor tissue of GC patients. CD8+ T cell subsets were defined as follows: Tn, CD3+CD8+CCR7+CD45RA+CD27+ CD95−; Tscm, CD3+CD8+CCR7+CD45RA+CD27+CD95+; Tm, CD3+CD8+CD45RA−; Te, CD3+CD8+ CD45RA+CD27−. Each dot represents an individual patient. * = P < 0.05; ** = P < 0.01; *** = P < 0.001.
Figure 2.Comparison of tumor cytotoxicity capacities differ between mouse CD8+ T cell subsets in vitro and in vivo. CD8+ Tn, Tscm, Tcm or Tem cells from the spleen of tumor-bearing mice were sorted by cell surface phenotype (Tn, CD3+CD8+CD44−CD62L+Sca−1−; Tscm, CD3+CD8+CD44−CD62L+Sca-1+; Tcm, CD3+CD8+CD44+CD62L+; Tem, CD3+CD8+CD44+CD62L−). For in vivo experiments, Rag1−/− mice were adoptively transferred 5 × 105 sorted MFC-primed Tscm, Tcm or Tem cells intravenously and then subcutaneously injected with MFC. A. Diagram summarizing the CD8+ Tn, Tscm, Tcm and Tem cell sorting procedure. B. Comparison of the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cell subsets 6h post-MFC co-cultures (E/T = 5:1 to 40:1; upper left panel), supernatant IFN-γ levels (E/T = 10:1; upper right panel) and flow cytometry analysis (E/T = 10:1; lower panel) showing CD62L and CD44 expression 16h post-MFC co-culture. Cells are gated as CD3+CD8+ events for flow cytometry analysis. C. Tumor sizes in Rag1−/− recipient mice bearing MFC tumors following the adoptive transfer of 5 × 105 sorted MFC-primed CD8+ Tscm, Tcm or Tem cells. Mice are sacrificed at day 10 post-adoptive cell transfer. D. Flow cytometry analysis of spleen, DLN and dissected tumors from all respective groups. Cells are gated as CD3+CD8+ events. E. Total number of CD8+ T cells recovered in the spleen, DLN and tumor of respective Rag1−/− recipient mice. * = P < 0.05; ** = P < 0.01; *** = p< 0.001; Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (n = 3). All data shown are representative of two independently performed experiments.
Figure 3.In vitro CD8+ T cell GSK-3β inhibition increases Tscm cell-induced tumor cell cytotoxicity and the upregulation of CD8+ effector T cell markers. A. Flow cytometry analysis of p-GSK-3β expression in respective human CD8+ T cell subsets. B. Flow cytometry analysis of p-GSK-3β expression in respective mouse CD8+ T cell subsets. C. Cytotoxic activity of mouse CD8+ T cell subsets with GSK-3β inhibitor or DMSO control 6h post-MFC co-culture (left panel). Flow cytometry analysis (right panel) showing CD62L and CD44 expression 16h post-MFC co-culture. D. CD8+ T cells from PBMC of healthy donors stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 and co-cultured with either 25% TTCS, 25% NTCS or RPMI-1640 medium alone. Overlaid histogram plots showing the expression levels of CD8+ effector T cell markers from CD8+ T cells in a representative healthy donor. E. Statistical analysis of marker expression levels in NTCS, TTCS or media cultured human CD8+ T cells. F. Flow cytometry analysis of IFN-γ and GrB levels. Cells are gated as all CD3+CD8+ events. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. * = P < 0.05; ** = P < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001. All data shown are representative of three independently performed experiments.
Figure 4.GSK-3β inhibition induces FasL-dependent enhancement of CD8 T cell cytotoxicity and aspects of CD8 effector T cell differentiation in vivo. C57BL/6 mice are subcutaneously injected with MFC in the presence of GSK-3β inhibitor or DMSO control, and a cohort additionally administered anti-FasL antibody. Mice were then taken day 10 post-MFC injection. A. MFI values for p-GSK-3β (upper panel) and GSK-3β (lower panel) expression in splenic CD8 T cells from each respective treatment group. Cells are gated as all CD3CD8 events. B. Tumors isolated from each respective treatment group. C. MFI values for FasL and Lamp1 expression of splenic and DLN CD8 T cells from each respective treatment group. Cells are gated as all CD3CD8 events. D. Percentages of IFN-γ and GrB splenic and DLN CD8 T cells from each respective treatment group. Cells are gated as all CD3CD8 events. E. Flow cytometry depicting CD62L and CD44 expression of splenic and DLN CD8 T cells from each respective treatment group. Lower graph represents the percentages of different CD8 T cell subsets (n = 4). Cells are gated as all CD3CD8 events. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. * = P < 0.05; ** = P < 0.01. All data shown are representative of two independently performed experiments.
Figure 5.GSK-3β inhibition induces FasL-dependent enhancement of CD8+ Tscm cell-mediated cytotoxicity. A. Mouse CD8+ Tscm cell MFC cell cytotoxicity levels post-GSK-3β inhibitor treatment in the presence or absence of anti-FasL antibody addition. B. Rag1−/− recipient mice are adoptively transferred 5 × 105 sorted MFC-primed CD8+ Tscm cells, and then subcutaneously injected with MFC in the presence of GSK-3β inhibitor or DMSO control. Tumor sizes were measured at day 10 post-transfer. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. * = P < 0.05. All data shown are representative of two independently performed experiments.