| Literature DB >> 29631549 |
Caroline Nyongesa1,2, Xiaoyue Xu3, John J Hall3, William M Macharia4, Faith Yego5, Brigid Hall6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Kenya, skilled attendance at delivery is well below the international target of 90% and the maternal mortality ratio is high at 362 (CI 254-471) per 100,000 live births despite various interventions. The preventative role of skilled attendance at delivery makes it a benchmark indicator for safe motherhood.Entities:
Keywords: Demographic health survey; Kenya; Kenya service provision assessment; Maternal health; Skilled attendance
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29631549 PMCID: PMC5891962 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1727-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.007
Characteristics of study participants
| Total | n 1445 | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||
| Education level✶ | < 0.001 | ||
| No education | 122 | 8.7 | |
| Primary and above | 1283 | 91.3 | |
| ANC Visits✶ | 0.001 | ||
| 1 | 554 | 39.3 | |
| 2–3 | 656 | 46.6 | |
| 4 or Above | 199 | 14.1 | |
| Sex of Provider✶ | < 0.001 | ||
| Male | 311 | 21.5 | |
| Female | 1134 | 78.5 | |
| Regions✶ | < 0.001 | ||
| Non- ASAL | 1168 | 80.8 | |
| ASAL (Eastern & Northeastern) | 277 | 19.7 |
✶Significant differences have been found between education level, ANC visits, sex of provider and region (p < 0.001)
Logistic regression models for skilled delivery, classified by predictor factor
| n | Univariate model | Final Multivariate model✶ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1445 | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | |||
| Cost (has money for delivery) | |||||
| No | 400 | Reference | |||
| Yes, enough | 457 | 8.99 (3.76; 21.44) | < 0.001 | 4.34.(1.73; 10.87) | 0.002 |
| Yes, but not enough | 552 | 2.80 (1.64; 4.76) | < 0.001 | 1.90(1.07; 3.35) | 0.027 |
| Opinion of ANC service | |||||
| Very satisfied | 1161 | Reference | |||
| Not satisfied | 223 | 0.89 (0.47; 1.68) | 0.711 | ||
| more or less satisfied | 22 | 0.97 (0.13; 7.40) | 0.977 | ||
| Service Waiting time | |||||
| < 30 | 751 | Reference | |||
| 30–60 min | 255 | 1.55 (0.77; 3.12) | 0.224 | ||
| 61–120 min | 170 | 1.32 (0.60; 2.85) | 0.482 | ||
| > 121 min | 233 | 2.40 (1.01; 5.70) | 0.048 | ||
| Age of client | |||||
| 1 year | 1401 | 1.00(0.95; 1.04) | 0.69 | ||
| Mother’s Education level | |||||
| No education | 122 | Reference | |||
| Primary and above | 1283 | 11.20 (6.55; 19.13) | < 0.001 | 6.62 (3.66; 11.95) | < 0.001 |
| Total number ANC Visits | |||||
| 1 | 554 | Reference | |||
| 2–3 | 656 | 1.71 (1.04; 2.82) | 0.04 | 1.58 (0.92; 2.7) | 0.095 |
| 4 or more | 199 | 7.95 (1.90; 33.24) | 0.01 | 5.95 (1.35; 26.18) | 0.018 |
| Sex of Provider | |||||
| Male | 311 | Reference | |||
| Female | 1134 | 2.57(1.55; 4.25) | 0.00 | 2.02(1.35; 3.53) | 0.014 |
| Geographical Region | |||||
| Non- ASAL | 1168 | Reference | |||
| ASAL | 277 | 0.31 (0.19; 0.52) | < 0.001 | ||
✶ Odds ratio for final model adjusted for cost, education, ANC visits and sex of provider