Literature DB >> 29630135

Magnesium bioavailability after administration of sucrosomial® magnesium: results of an ex-vivo study and a comparative, double-blinded, cross-over study in healthy subjects.

E Brilli1, S Khadge, A Fabiano, Y Zambito, T Williams, G Tarantino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We conducted an ex-vivo analysis and a study in healthy subjects to compare magnesium bioavailability after administration of Sucrosomial® magnesium or commercially available preparations of magnesium citrate, magnesium oxide and magnesium bisglycinate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the ex-vivo study we simulated magnesium intestinal absorption after digestion through sections of intestinal mucosa isolated from rats. We compared the absorption of magnesium oxide and Sucrosomial® magnesium at two different concentrations: 32.9 mg/ml and 329 mg/ml. The human study was a single day double-blinded repeated crossover study in healthy subjects. Each subject was administered 350 mg magnesium in different formulations (Sucrosomial® magnesium, magnesium citrate, magnesium oxide or magnesium bisglycinate) after 1 week of washout. We collected blood and urine samples to measure magnesium concentration in blood, urine and red blood cells.
RESULTS: The ex-vivo evaluation showed that magnesium absorption after administration of Sucrosomial® magnesium was faster and with higher rates compared to a standard formulation of magnesium oxide. This finding was further confirmed by the results of the study in healthy subjects, that showed a more evident increase in magnesium concentration after administration of Sucrosomial® magnesium compared to the other formulations. In particular, the increase in magnesium concentration from baseline to 24 h was statistically higher in blood and in urine for Sucrosomial® magnesium compared to magnesium oxide, while in red blood cells Sucrosomial® magnesium had a statistically significant advantage compared to magnesium bisglycinate.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that Sucrosomial® magnesium leads to an increased bioavailability of magnesium compared to other formulations. Further studies are needed to investigate if this advantage turns into more evident clinical efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29630135     DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201803_14605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci        ISSN: 1128-3602            Impact factor:   3.507


  5 in total

Review 1.  Magnesium for Pain Treatment in 2021? State of the Art.

Authors:  Véronique Morel; Marie-Eva Pickering; Jonathan Goubayon; Marguérite Djobo; Nicolas Macian; Gisèle Pickering
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  Does the association of therapeutic exercise and supplementation with sucrosomial magnesium improve posture and balance and prevent the risk of new falls?

Authors:  Dalila Scaturro; Fabio Vitagliani; Pietro Terrana; Sofia Tomasello; Lawrence Camarda; Giulia Letizia Mauro
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Liposomal Mineral Absorption: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Grant M Tinsley; Patrick S Harty; Matthew T Stratton; Madelin R Siedler; Christian Rodriguez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  In Vitro and In Vivo Sucrosomial® Berberine Activity on Insulin Resistance.

Authors:  Maria Giovanna Lupo; Elisa Brilli; Virginia De Vito; Germano Tarantino; Stefania Sut; Irene Ferrarese; Giovanni Panighel; Daniela Gabbia; Sara De Martin; Stefano Dall'Acqua; Nicola Ferri
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.706

5.  Study of Magnesium Formulations on Intestinal Cells to Influence Myometrium Cell Relaxation.

Authors:  Francesca Uberti; Vera Morsanuto; Sara Ruga; Rebecca Galla; Mahitab Farghali; Felice Notte; Chiarella Bozzo; Corrado Magnani; Antonio Nardone; Claudio Molinari
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.