Literature DB >> 29629761

Small Gd(III) Tags for Gd(III)-Gd(III) Distance Measurements in Proteins by EPR Spectroscopy.

Georgia Prokopiou1, Michael D Lee2, Alberto Collauto1, Elwy H Abdelkader3, Thorsten Bahrenberg1, Akiva Feintuch1, Marie Ramirez-Cohen1, Jessica Clayton4, James D Swarbrick2, Bim Graham2, Gottfried Otting3, Daniella Goldfarb1.   

Abstract

The C7-Gd and C8-Gd tags are compact hydrophilic cyclen-based lanthanide tags for conjugation to cysteine residues in proteins. The tags are enantiomers, which differ in the configuration of the 2-hydroxylpropyl pendant arms coordinating the lanthanide ion. Here, we report the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) performance of the C7-Gd ( S configuration) and C8-Gd ( R configuration) tags loaded with Gd(III) on two mutants of the homodimeric ERp29 protein. The W-band EPR spectra were found to differ between the tags in the free state and after conjugation to the protein. In addition, the spectra were sensitive to the labeling position, which may originate from an environment-dependent charge density on the Gd(III)-coordinating oxygens. This is in agreement with previous NMR experiments with different lanthanide ions, which suggested sensitivity to H-bonding. W-band 1H-ENDOR (electron-electron double resonance) experiments detected effects from orientation selection in the central transition, due to a relatively narrow distribution in the ZFS parameters as indicated by simulations. In contrast, the distance distributions derived from DEER (double electron-electron resonance) measurements were insensitive to the R or S configuration of the tags and did not exhibit any orientation selection effects. The DEER measurements faithfully reflected the different widths of the distance distributions at the different protein sites in agreement with previous DEER measurements using other Gd(III) tags. Due to their small size, short tether to the protein, and a broad central EPR transition, the C7-Gd and C8-Gd tags are attractive Gd(III) tags for measurements of relatively short (<4 nm) distances by EPR spectroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29629761     DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inorg Chem        ISSN: 0020-1669            Impact factor:   5.165


  5 in total

Review 1.  Paramagnetic Chemical Probes for Studying Biological Macromolecules.

Authors:  Qing Miao; Christoph Nitsche; Henry Orton; Mark Overhand; Gottfried Otting; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 72.087

2.  Double Nitroxide Labeling by Copper-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloadditions with Noncanonical Amino Acids for Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Pia Widder; Frederic Berner; Daniel Summerer; Malte Drescher
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Sub-Micromolar Pulse Dipolar EPR Spectroscopy Reveals Increasing CuII -labelling of Double-Histidine Motifs with Lower Temperature.

Authors:  Joshua L Wort; Katrin Ackermann; Angeliki Giannoulis; Alan J Stewart; David G Norman; Bela E Bode
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Probing the solution structure of the E. coli multidrug transporter MdfA using DEER distance measurements with nitroxide and Gd(III) spin labels.

Authors:  Eliane H Yardeni; Thorsten Bahrenberg; Richard A Stein; Smriti Mishra; Elia Zomot; Bim Graham; Kellie L Tuck; Thomas Huber; Eitan Bibi; Hassane S Mchaourab; Daniella Goldfarb
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  In situ observation of conformational dynamics and protein ligand-substrate interactions in outer-membrane proteins with DEER/PELDOR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Benesh Joseph; Eva A Jaumann; Arthur Sikora; Katja Barth; Thomas F Prisner; David S Cafiso
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 13.491

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.