Literature DB >> 29629723

Comparison Between the Pouch-Perineum Distance in Neonates With a Low-Type Anorectal Malformation With and Without an Opened Fistula: Pitfall of Measuring the Pouch-Perineum Distance on Sonography.

Takahiro Hosokawa1, Hiroaki Takahashi2, Yutaka Tanami1, Yumiko Sato1, Yujiro Tanaka3, Hiroshi Kawashima4, Mayumi Hosokawa5, Eiji Oguma1, Yoshitake Yamada6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An anorectal malformation (ARM) in neonates requires urgent surgery, with the type of surgery being dependent on the type of malformation (low, intermediate, or high). Distal rectal pouch and perineum (pouch-perineum) distance is reported to be useful for differentiating the type of ARM; however, the impact of an opened fistula on pouch-perineum distance is not well known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in pouch-perineum distance between neonates with a low-type ARM with and without an opened fistula.
METHODS: We included 24 neonates with low-type ARM who underwent sonography before surgery. Eight neonates already had an opened fistula before sonography, and 16 did not. The pouch-perineum distance was measured using the perineal approach. Mann-Whitney U and Spearman's correlation coefficient tests were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The mean pouch-perineum distance in all neonates with a low-type ARM was 8.3 ± 2.9 mm. The pouch-perineum distance was substantially longer for an ARM with than without an opened fistula (10.6 ± 3.4 mm vs. 7.1 ± 1.7 mm; P = .02). No appreciable correlation was identified between the pouch-perineum distance and the postnatal day of examination (ρ = -.23, P = .26) or birth weight (ρ = .15, P = .47).
CONCLUSION: The pouch-perineum distance is substantially longer in neonates with an ARM with an opened fistula than in those without an opened fistula. Caution should be exercised by the sonographic examiner in evaluating pouch-perineum distance in neonates with an opened fistula to prevent an incorrect surgical procedure based on misdiagnosis of the type of ARM.
© 2018 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anorectal malformation; fistula; imperforate anus; newborn; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29629723     DOI: 10.1002/jum.14636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  2 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound imaging of the anorectal malformation during the neonatal period: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosokawa; Yoshitake Yamada; Mayumi Hsokawa; Shunsuke Kikuchi; Kenji Ohira; Yutaka Tanami; Yumiko Sato; Eiji Oguma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for fistulae at ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram in neonates with anorectal malformation.

Authors:  Takahiro Hosokawa; Yoshitake Yamada; Yutaka Tanami; Yumiko Sato; Tetsuya Ishimaru; Yujiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Kawashima; Eiji Oguma
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.