Literature DB >> 29628804

A Preliminary Study of Chiropractors' Beliefs About Biomedical and Biopsychosocial Pain: A Survey of University of Western States Alumni.

Suzanne D Lady1, Mitchell Haas2, Ryan Takagi3, Leslie Takaki2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this preliminary study was to investigate differences between doctors of chiropractic with respect to their preference for the biomedical or biopsychosocial attitude and belief models.
METHODS: Alumni of the University of Western States doctor of chiropractic program were asked to complete an online survey that included the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists. This scale yields a biomedical score (10-60 scale) and a biopsychosocial score (9-54 scale). These scores are reported for 5 participant characteristics: sex, country of residence (USA vs other), chiropractic program completed (University of Western States vs other), decade of graduation, and years in practice. Secondarily, multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the independent effects of participant characteristics on the 2 Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists scales.
RESULTS: Of 3877 surveys, 233 were included in the analysis (response rate = 4.7%-7.4%). The mean biomedical scale score was 33.9 (standard deviation = 6.5), and the mean biopsychosocial scale score was 32.4 (standard deviation = 4.1). There was little variation in scores across the 5 participant characteristics (P > .05). Cronbach's α for the biomedical scale reached an acceptable level of internal consistency (0.74). In contrast, Cronbach's α for the biopsychosocial scale was 0.40.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary study found that in a sample of chiropractic program alumni of the University of Western States, there were no differences with respect to preference for the biomedical or biopsychosocial attitude and belief models. A better understanding requires a larger study comparing attitudes/beliefs with behavior in practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitude; Chiropractic; Culture; Pain

Year:  2017        PMID: 29628804      PMCID: PMC5883626          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  17 in total

1.  Health care providers' orientations towards common low back pain predict perceived harmfulness of physical activities and recommendations regarding return to normal activity.

Authors:  Ruud M A Houben; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Pieter M J C Wolters; Madelon Peters; Suzanne G M Stomp-van den Berg
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.931

2.  Attitudes to back pain amongst musculoskeletal practitioners: a comparison of professional groups and practice settings using the ABS-mp.

Authors:  Tamar Pincus; Nadine E Foster; Steven Vogel; Rita Santos; Alan Breen; Martin Underwood
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2006-08-17

Review 3.  Health care practitioners' attitudes and beliefs about low back pain: a systematic search and critical review of available measurement tools.

Authors:  Annette Bishop; Elaine Thomas; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Adherence to clinical practice guidelines among three primary contact professions: a best evidence synthesis of the literature for the management of acute and subacute low back pain.

Authors:  Lyndon G Amorin-Woods; Randy W Beck; Gregory F Parkin-Smith; James Lougheed; Alexandra P Bremner
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-09

5.  A survey of primary care physician practice patterns and adherence to acute low back problem guidelines.

Authors:  D Di Iorio; E Henley; A Doughty
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

6.  Primary care physicians' attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain: an Asian study.

Authors:  Regina W S Sit; Benjamin H K Yip; Dicken C C Chan; Samuel Y S Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A path analysis of the effects of the doctor-patient encounter and expectancy in an open-label randomized trial of spinal manipulation for the care of low back pain.

Authors:  Mitchell Haas; Darcy Vavrek; Moni B Neradilek; Nayak Polissar
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.659

8.  Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain.

Authors:  Silje E Reme; Eli M Hagen; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists.

Authors:  Annette Bishop; Nadine E Foster; Elaine Thomas; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Compliance with clinical guidelines for whiplash improved with a targeted implementation strategy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Trudy Rebbeck; Luciana G Macedo; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.