Literature DB >> 29627226

Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to structural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review.

Mahmoud Iews1, Justin Tan2, Omur Taskin2, Sukainah Alfaraj2, Faten F AbdelHafez3, Ahmed H Abdellah4, Mohamed A Bedaiwy5.   

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a common, yet elusive, complication of pregnancy. Among couples at high risk of RPL, such as those carrying a structural chromosomal rearrangement, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been proposed as a tool to improve live birth rates and reduce the incidence of miscarriage; however, no clear consensus has been reached on its benefits in this population. This systematic review summarizes existing published research on the effect of PGD on pregnancy outcomes among carriers of chromosomal abnormalities with RPL. A comprehensive search of common databases was conducted, which yielded 20 studies. Meta-analysis was precluded owing to significant heterogeneity between studies. The primary outcome of interest was live birth rate (LBR), and a pooled total of 847 couples who conceived naturally had a LBR ranging from 25-71% compared with 26.7-87% among 562 couples who underwent IVF and PGD. Limitations of the study include lack of large comparative or randomized control studies. Patients experiencing RPL with structural chromosomal rearrangement should be counselled that good reproductive outcomes can be achieved through natural conception, and that IVF-PGD should not be offered first-line, given the unproven benefits, additional cost and potential complications associated with assisted reproductive technology.
Copyright © 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis; Recurrent pregnancy loss; Translocation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627226     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  11 in total

1.  Interchromosomal effect in carriers of translocations and inversions assessed by preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR).

Authors:  E Mateu-Brull; L Rodrigo; V Peinado; A Mercader; I Campos-Galindo; F Bronet; S García-Herrero; M Florensa; M Milán; C Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement.

Authors:  Tatsuya Nakano; Michiko Ammae; Manabu Satoh; Satoshi Mizuno; Yoshiharu Nakaoka; Yoshiharu Morimoto
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-29

3.  Blastocyst conversion rate and ploidy in patients with structural rearrangements.

Authors:  Iris G Insogna; A Lanes; L Dobson; E S Ginsburg; C Racowsky; E Yanushpolsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype.

Authors:  Gang Li; Weiyi Shi; Wenbin Niu; Jiawei Xu; Yihong Guo; Yingchun Su; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Fertility problems in males carrying an inversion of chromosome 10.

Authors:  Xinyue Zhang; Qingyang Shi; Yanhong Liu; Yuting Jiang; Xiao Yang; Ruizhi Liu; Hongguo Zhang
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-02-18

6.  Analysis of parental abnormal chromosomal karyotype and subsequent live births in Chinese couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Shan Li; Mei Chen; Peng-Sheng Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  In vitro fertilization outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements comparing fluorescence in-situ hybridization, microarray comparative genomic hybridization, and next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Chantal B Bartels; Reeva Makhijani; Prachi Godiwala; Alison Bartolucci; John C Nulsen; Daniel R Grow; Lawrence Engmann; Claudio A Benadiva
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-25

Review 8.  Expectant management and live birth outcomes for male balanced-translocation carriers: Two case reports and a literature review.

Authors:  Haitao Fan; Xiuyan Wang; Xiao Yang; Hongshu Zheng; Shuqiang Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Clinical outcomes of Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) application in couples with chromosomal inversion, a study in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Yuhan Shao; Jing Li; Juanjuan Lu; Hongchang Li; Yueting Zhu; Wenjie Jiang; Junhao Yan
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Ralph S Papas; William H Kutteh
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2021-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.