Literature DB >> 29627206

Comparative analysis of the microstructures and mechanical properties of Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated by different methods.

Yanan Zhou1, Ning Li2, Jiazhen Yan3, Qiang Zeng4.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Limited information is available regarding the microstructures and mechanical properties of Co-Cr dental alloys prepared using conventional casting (CAST), computer numerical control (CNC) milling, and selective laser melting (SLM).
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical properties and microstructures of Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated using conventional casting, computer numerical control milling, and selective laser melting and to estimate the potential of applying the SLM technique in prosthetic dentistry.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Each group (n=6) of 50-mm-long Co-Cr alloy, dumbbell-shaped specimens was fabricated using the CAST, CNC, and SLM techniques. For each technique, the corresponding commercial alloy material was used. The mechanical properties were evaluated using a tensile test according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 6892, including 0.2% yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, elongation, and fracture analysis. The microstructures of the specimens were evaluated by using metallurgical microscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy. The Tukey honest significant difference test (α=.05) was used to statistically analyze the 0.2% yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and microhardness values.
RESULTS: The microstructures of the SLM specimens exhibited homogeneously distributed fine grains, dispersed second-phase particles, and few defects, and the XRD results showed the α-Co phase predominated, with minimal ε-Co phase and no harmful needle σ phase in the SLM group. The mean ±standard deviation of the 0.2% yield strength of the SLM specimens was 790 ±11 MPa, and the ultimate tensile strength was 1072 ±18 MPa. These values exceeded those of the CAST and CNC specimens by approximately 50% (P<.05). The SLM group showed the highest microhardness (475.3 ±10.2 HV10), followed by the CNC (325.2 ±17.8 HV10) and CAST group (323.7 ±27.2 HV10). Additionally, the ductility and toughness of the SLM specimens were also better than those of the other 2 groups. No significant differences were found in the mechanical performance between the CNC and CAST specimens (P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The microstructures and mechanical properties of Co-Cr dental alloys were dependent on the fabrication techniques. The SLM specimens exhibited better microstructures and mechanical properties than those fabricated with CNC or CAST.
Copyright © 2017 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627206     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

1.  Characterization of Co-Cr-W Dental Alloys with Veneering Materials Manufactured via Subtractive Milling and Additive Manufacturing LDED Methods.

Authors:  Óscar Barro; Felipe Arias-González; Fernando Lusquiños; Rafael Comesaña; Jesús Del Val; Antonio Riveiro; Aida Badaoui; Félix Gómez-Baño; Juan Pou
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Evaluation of corrosion resistance of Co-Cr alloys fabricated with different metal laser sintering systems.

Authors:  Süleyman Hakan Tuna; Erhan Karaca; İsmail Aslan; Gürel Pekkan; Nuran Özçiçek Pekmez
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Retention Forces of Prosthetic Clasps over a Simulated Wearing Period of Six Years In-Vitro: Direct Metal Laser Melting Versus Dental Casting.

Authors:  Moritz Mutschler; Florian Schweitzer; Sebastian Spintzyk; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Fabian Huettig
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Inflammatory Response to Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Fabricated With Different Techniques.

Authors:  Maria Kassapidou; Victoria Franke Stenport; Carina B Johansson; Anna-Karin Östberg; Petra Hammarström Johansson; Lars Hjalmarsson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Additively Manufactured Commercial Co-Cr Dental Alloys: Comparison of Microstructure and Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Dalibor Viderščak; Zdravko Schauperl; Sanja Šolić; Amir Ćatić; Matjaž Godec; Aleksandra Kocijan; Irena Paulin; Črtomir Donik
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Metal-Ceramic Bond Strength of Co-Cr Dental Alloy Fabricated by Different Manufacturing Processes.

Authors:  Xingting Han; Tomofumi Sawada; Christine Schille; Ernst Schweizer; Lutz Scheideler; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Frank Rupp; Sebastian Spintzyk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.