Literature DB >> 29627083

High-Frequency Quantitative Ultrasound for Imaging Prostate Cancer Using a Novel Micro-Ultrasound Scanner.

Daniel Rohrbach1, Brian Wodlinger2, Jerrold Wen2, Jonathan Mamou3, Ernest Feleppa3.   

Abstract

Currently, biopsies guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) are the only method for definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer. Studies by our group suggest that quantitative ultrasound (QUS) could provide a more sensitive means of targeting biopsies and directing focal treatments to cancer-suspicious regions in the prostate. Previous studies have utilized ultrasound signals at typical clinical frequencies, i.e., in the 6-MHz range. In the present study, a 29-MHz, TRUS, micro-ultrasound system and transducer (ExactVu micro-ultrasound, Exact Imaging, Markham, Canada) was used to acquire radio frequency data from 163 patients immediately before 12-core biopsy procedures, comprising 1956 cores. These retrospective data are a subset of data acquired in an ongoing, multisite, 2000-patient, randomized, clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02079025). Spectrum-based QUS estimates of effective scatter diameter (ESD), effective acoustic concentration (EAC), midband (M), intercept (I) and slope (S) as well as envelope statistics employing a Nakagami distribution were used to train linear discriminant classifiers (LDCs) and support vector machines (SVMs). Classifier performance was assessed using area-under-the-curve (AUC) values obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses with 10-fold cross validation. A combination of ESD and EAC parameters resulted in an AUC value of 0.77 using a LDC. When Nakagami-µ or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values were added as features, the AUC value increased to 0.79. SVM produced an AUC value of 0.77, using a combination of envelope and spectral QUS estimates. The best classification produced an AUC value of 0.81 using an LDC when combining envelope statistics, PSA, ESD and EAC. In a previous study, B-mode-based scoring and evaluation using the PRI-MUS protocol produced a maximal AUC value of 0.74 for higher Gleason-score values (GS >7) when read by an expert. Our initial results with AUC values of 0.81 are very encouraging for developing a new, predominantly user-independent, prostate-cancer, risk-assessing tool.
Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High frequency; Prostate cancer; QUS; Quantitative micro-ultrasound; Quantitative ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29627083     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging in individualized uro-oncology].

Authors:  J Bründl; J Breyer; M Burger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Validation of differences in backscatter coefficients among four ultrasound scanners with different beamforming methods.

Authors:  Masaaki Omura; Hideyuki Hasegawa; Ryo Nagaoka; Kenji Yoshida; Tadashi Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  Multiparametric ultrasound and micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Adriano Basso Dias; Ciara O'Brien; Jean-Michel Correas; Sangeet Ghai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: A multicenter, prospective analysis.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Giovanni Lughezzani; Davide Maffei; Andrea Sánchez; José Gregorio Pereira; Frédéric Staerman; Hannes Cash; Ferdinand Luger; Laurent Lopez; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Rob Abouassaly; Neal D Shore; Gregg Eure; Marco Paciotti; Ander Astobieta; Laura Wiemer; Sebastian Hofbauer; Robin Heckmann; Andreas Gusenleitner; Jasmin Kaar; Clemens Mayr; Wolfgang Loidl; Jean Rouffilange; Richard Gaston; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Klein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics.

Authors:  Rogier R Wildeboer; Christophe K Mannaerts; Ruud J G van Sloun; Lars Budäus; Derya Tilki; Hessel Wijkstra; Georg Salomon; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Micro-Ultrasound Imaging for Accuracy of Diagnosis in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Minhao Zhang; Rong Wang; Yuqing Wu; Jibo Jing; Shuqiu Chen; Guangyuan Zhang; Bin Xu; Chunhui Liu; Ming Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Construction of a Computer-Aided Analysis System for Orthopedic Diseases Based on High-Frequency Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  Feifei Xiu; Guishan Rong; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 8.  Quantitative Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis Using Advanced Imaging Techniques: Focusing on New Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques.

Authors:  Junghoan Park; Jeong Min Lee; Gunwoo Lee; Sun Kyung Jeon; Ijin Joo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Monitoring of Adult Zebrafish Heart Regeneration Using High-Frequency Ultrasound Spectral Doppler and Nakagami Imaging.

Authors:  Sunmi Yeo; Changhan Yoon; Ching-Ling Lien; Tai-Kyong Song; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  A Preliminary Study of Quantitative Ultrasound for Cancer-Risk Assessment of Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Poorani N Goundan; Jonathan Mamou; Daniel Rohrbach; Jason Smith; Harshal Patel; Kirk D Wallace; Ernest J Feleppa; Stephanie L Lee
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.