Christopher J Pannucci1, Kory I Fleming2, Kathleen Holoyda2, Lauren Moulton3, Ann Marie Prazak4, Thomas K Varghese5. 1. Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: christopher.pannucci@hsc.utah.edu. 2. Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. Huntsman Cancer Hospital Intensive Care Unit, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 4. Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 5. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many patients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures have venous thromboembolism (VTE) events despite the receipt of chemical prophylaxis. Enoxaparin's pharmacologic impact can be quantified by using anti-Factor Xa (aFXa) levels. We hypothesized that enoxaparin 40 mg once daily would be inadequate for most inpatients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures and that a real-time dose adjustment algorithm would be effective. METHODS: This prospective clinical trial enrolled inpatients who were to undergo a thoracic surgical procedure and placed on enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for VTE prophylaxis after surgical procedures. aFXa levels were used to measure the anticoagulant effect of enoxaparin once steady state had been reached. Patients whose aFXa levels were out of range received real-time enoxaparin dose adjustment and had repeat aFXa levels drawn. RESULTS: Ninety-three inpatients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures were prospectively enrolled. The majority of patients (67.4%) had low peak aFXa levels (<0.3 IU/mL), indicative of inadequate enoxaparin prophylaxis, and 30.3% of patients had in-range aFXa levels (0.3 to 0.5 IU/mL). Patient weight had a moderate correlation (r2 0.38) with peak aFXa level. Patient weight, female sex, and preoperative creatinine were independent predictors of peak aFXa in a linear regression model. Real-time, protocol-driven enoxaparin dose adjustment allowed a significantly increased proportion of patients to achieve in-range aFXa levels (30.3% vs 97.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin 40 mg once daily is inadequate for most inpatients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures, based on a pharmacodynamic study of aFXa levels. Future research should examine the impact of weight-based once daily enoxaparin dosing versus twice daily enoxaparin dosing on prophylaxis adequacy.
BACKGROUND: Many patients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures have venous thromboembolism (VTE) events despite the receipt of chemical prophylaxis. Enoxaparin's pharmacologic impact can be quantified by using anti-Factor Xa (aFXa) levels. We hypothesized that enoxaparin 40 mg once daily would be inadequate for most inpatients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures and that a real-time dose adjustment algorithm would be effective. METHODS: This prospective clinical trial enrolled inpatients who were to undergo a thoracic surgical procedure and placed on enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for VTE prophylaxis after surgical procedures. aFXa levels were used to measure the anticoagulant effect of enoxaparin once steady state had been reached. Patients whose aFXa levels were out of range received real-time enoxaparin dose adjustment and had repeat aFXa levels drawn. RESULTS: Ninety-three inpatients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures were prospectively enrolled. The majority of patients (67.4%) had low peak aFXa levels (<0.3 IU/mL), indicative of inadequate enoxaparin prophylaxis, and 30.3% of patients had in-range aFXa levels (0.3 to 0.5 IU/mL). Patient weight had a moderate correlation (r2 0.38) with peak aFXa level. Patient weight, female sex, and preoperative creatinine were independent predictors of peak aFXa in a linear regression model. Real-time, protocol-driven enoxaparin dose adjustment allowed a significantly increased proportion of patients to achieve in-range aFXa levels (30.3% vs 97.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Enoxaparin 40 mg once daily is inadequate for most inpatients undergoing thoracic surgical procedures, based on a pharmacodynamic study of aFXa levels. Future research should examine the impact of weight-based once daily enoxaparin dosing versus twice daily enoxaparin dosing on prophylaxis adequacy.
Authors: Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Corinne B Bertolaccini; Ann Marie Prazak; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Jeffrey I Zwicker; Joanna Roopkumar; Maneka Puligandla; Benjamin L Schlechter; Anish V Sharda; David Peereboom; Robin Joyce; Bruno Bockorny; Donna Neuberg; Kenneth A Bauer; Alok A Khorana Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-05-26
Authors: Michelle B Mulder; Kenneth G Proctor; Evan J Valle; Alan S Livingstone; Dao M Nguyen; Robert M Van Haren Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Thomas K Varghese; John Stringham; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron; Ann Marie Prazak; Corinne Bertolaccini; Arash Momeni Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Yasser Sakr; Manuela Giovini; Marc Leone; Giacinto Pizzilli; Andreas Kortgen; Michael Bauer; Tommaso Tonetti; Gary Duclos; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Samuel Buschbeck; V Marco Ranieri; Elio Antonucci Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Yasser Sakr; Manuela Giovini; Marc Leone; Giacinto Pizzilli; Andreas Kortgen; Michael Bauer; Tommaso Tonetti; Gary Duclos; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Samuel Buschbeck; V Marco Ranieri; Elio Antonucci Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 6.925