Literature DB >> 29626174

Acceptability and effectiveness of using mobile applications to promote HIV and other STI testing among men who have sex with men in Barcelona, Spain.

Miguel Alarcón Gutiérrez1,2, Manuel Fernández Quevedo1, Silvia Martín Valle3, Constanza Jacques-Aviñó1, Elia Díez David3,4, Joan A Caylà1,4, Patricia García de Olalla1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of a pilot intervention programme using gay geosocial mobile applications (apps) to offer rapid HIV and other STI tests to men who have sex with men (MSM) in Barcelona between December 2015 and March 2016.
METHODOLOGY: We offered rapid HIV, syphilis and hepatitis C testing by sending private messages on apps for sexual and social encounters. Acceptance was defined as the proportion of users who favourably responded to the message and effectiveness was defined as the proportion of users who attended our facilities among those who were interested in attending. To identify variables associated with the response to the messages, multivariate logistic regression was used. Adjusted OR (ORa) and 95% CIs were calculated. We collected information on sociodemographics, sexual behaviours and app usage from the contacted user profiles and from users who attended our facilities. A descriptive analysis was carried out.
RESULTS: 2656 individual messages were sent. Overall, a 38.4% response rate was obtained, 83.0% of them found it acceptable to receive the unsolicited message, and 73.2% effectiveness was obtained. Responders had higher odds of being 45 years or older (ORa=1.48; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.08), being connected at the moment the message was sent or during the previous hour (ORa=1.92; 95% CI 1.38 to 2.68), having a profile photo not exposing bare chest or abdomen (ORa=1.44; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.92) and using the Grindr app (ORa=1.39; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.73). Of those who were tested and took the survey (n=77), 45.5% had not taken an HIV test in over a year, 24.7% had had a previous STI diagnosis, 51.4% had reported anal sex without condom and 52% had consumed alcohol or drugs for sex.
CONCLUSIONS: The response rate, acceptance and effectiveness observed in this study indicate that this strategy could be a useful tool for promoting STI testing among high-risk MSM population. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hiv; Hiv testing; communication technologies; gay men; sexual behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29626174     DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ethical Considerations in HIV eHealth Intervention Research: Implications for Informational Risk in Recruitment, Data Maintenance, and Consent Procedures.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Elise Bragard; Rachel Bloom
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  A systematic review of mHealth interventions for HIV prevention and treatment among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Kimberly M Nelson; Nicholas S Perry; Keith J Horvath; Laramie R Smith
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  HIV Testing Strategies, Types of Tests, and Uptake by Men Who have Sex with Men and Transgender Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laio Magno; Marcos Pereira; Caroline Tianeze de Castro; Thais Aranha Rossi; Laylla Mirella Galvão Azevedo; Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães; Ines Dourado
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 4.  A systematic review of the engagement with social media-delivered interventions for improving health outcomes among sexual and gender minorities.

Authors:  César G Escobar-Viera; Eleanna M Melcher; Rebekah S Miller; Darren L Whitfield; Daniel Jacobson-López; Jacob D Gordon; Adrian J Ballard; Bruce L Rollman; Sherry Pagoto
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2021-07-07

5.  Grindr Users Take More Risks, but Are More Open to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: Could This Dating App Provide a Platform for HIV Prevention Outreach?

Authors:  Martin Hoenigl; Susan J Little; David Grelotti; Britt Skaathun; Gabriel A Wagner; Nadir Weibel; Jamila K Stockman; Davey M Smith
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  A Review of Recent HIV Prevention Interventions and Future Considerations for Nursing Science.

Authors:  Megan Threats; Bridgette M Brawner; Tiffany M Montgomery; Jasmine Abrams; Loretta Sweet Jemmott; Pierre-Cedric Crouch; Kellie Freeborn; Emiko Kamitani; Comfort Enah
Journal:  J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 1.809

7.  Extent and selectivity of sexual orientation disclosure and its association with HIV and other STI testing patterns among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Rayner Kay Jin Tan; Alvin Kuo Jing Teo; Nashwinder Kaur; Jack Harrison-Quintana; Chen Seong Wong; Mark I-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Prevention of HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections by Geofencing and Contextualized Messages With a Gamified App, UBESAFE: Design and Creation Study.

Authors:  Felipe Besoain; Antoni Perez-Navarro; Constanza Jacques Aviñó; Joan A Caylà; Nicolas A Barriga; Patricia Garcia de Olalla
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 9.  Electronic and other new media technology interventions for HIV care and prevention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin M Maloney; Anna Bratcher; Ryan Wilkerson; Patrick S Sullivan
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.396

10.  Risk-Taking Behaviors and Adherence to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Users of Geosocial Networking Apps: Real-World, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Junjie Xu; Hong Shang; Hongyi Wang; Jing Zhang; Zhenxing Chu; Qinghai Hu; Willa Dong; Xiaojie Huang; Yaokai Chen; Hui Wang; Xiaoqing He; Lukun Zhang; Zhili Hu; Rantong Bao; Shangcao Li; Hang Li; Sitong Cui; Xia Jin; Haibo Ding; Wenqing Geng; Yongjun Jiang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.