Literature DB >> 29625464

Safety Studies for a 44-Channel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: A Chronic Passive Study.

Carla J Abbott1,2, David A X Nayagam3,4, Chi D Luu1,2, Stephanie B Epp3, Richard A Williams4,5, Cesar M Salinas-LaRosa4,5, Joel Villalobos3, Ceara McGowan3, Mohit N Shivdasani3,6, Owen Burns3, Jason Leavens7, Jonathan Yeoh1,2, Alice A Brandli1,8, Patrick C Thien3,9, Jenny Zhou3, Helen Feng3, Chris E Williams3,9, Robert K Shepherd3,9, Penelope J Allen1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Following successful clinical outcomes of the prototype suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis, Bionic Vision Australia has developed an upgraded 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis to provide a wider field of view and more phosphenes. The aim was to evaluate the preclinical passive safety characteristics of the upgraded electrode array.
Methods: Ten normal-sighted felines were unilaterally implanted with an array containing platinum electrodes (44 stimulating and 2 returns) on a silicone carrier near the area centralis. Clinical assessments (color fundus photos, optical coherence tomography, full-field electroretinography, intraocular pressure) were performed under anesthesia prior to surgery, and longitudinally for up to 20 weeks. Histopathology grading of fibrosis and inflammation was performed in two animals at 13 to 15 weeks.
Results: Eight animals showed safe electrode array insertion (good retinal health) and good conformability of the array to the retinal curvature. Eight animals demonstrated good mechanical stability of the array with only minor (<2 disc diameters) lateral movement. Four cases of surgical or stability complications occurred due to (1) bulged choroid during surgery, (2) hemorrhage from a systemic bleeding disorder, (3) infection, and (4) partial erosion of thin posterior sclera. There was no change in retinal structure or function (other than that seen at surgery) at endpoint. Histopathology showed a mild foreign body response. Electrodes were intact on electrode array removal. Conclusions: The 44-channel suprachoroidal electrode array has an acceptable passive safety profile to proceed to clinical trial. The safety profile is expected to improve in human studies, as the complications seen are specific to limitations (anatomic differences) with the feline model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29625464     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-23086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  14 in total

1.  Medical and Surgical Applications for the Suprachoroidal Space.

Authors:  Parisa Emami-Naeini; Glenn Yiu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2019

Review 2.  An update on retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Nick Barnes; Gislin Dagnelie; Takashi Fujikado; Georges Goetz; Ralf Hornig; Bryan W Jones; Mahiul M K Muqit; Daniel L Rathbun; Katarina Stingl; James D Weiland; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Bioengineering strategies for restoring vision.

Authors:  Jasmina Cehajic-Kapetanovic; Mandeep S Singh; Eberhart Zrenner; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 4.  Retinal Prosthetic Approaches to Enhance Visual Perception for Blind Patients.

Authors:  Shinyong Shim; Kyungsik Eom; Joonsoo Jeong; Sung June Kim
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 5.  Advances in retinal prosthesis systems.

Authors:  Edward Bloch; Yvonne Luo; Lyndon da Cruz
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-17

6.  Testing of Newly Developed Wide-Field Dual-Array Suprachoroidal-Transretinal Stimulation Prosthesis in Dogs.

Authors:  Takeshi Morimoto; Takashi Fujikado; Hiroyuki Kanda; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Takao Endo; Kentaro Nishida; Haruhiko Kishima; Toru Saito; Kunihiko Ito; Motoki Ozawa; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Functional Vision in the Real-World Environment With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Lewis Karapanos; Carla J Abbott; Lauren N Ayton; Maria Kolic; Myra B McGuinness; Elizabeth K Baglin; Samuel A Titchener; Jessica Kvansakul; Dean Johnson; William G Kentler; Nick Barnes; David A X Nayagam; Penelope J Allen; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  New epiretinal implant with integrated sensor chips for optical capturing shows a good biocompatibility profile in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Kim Schaffrath; Tibor Lohmann; Jan Seifert; Claudia Ingensiep; Pascal Raffelberg; Florian Waschkowski; Reinhard Viga; Rainer Kokozinski; Wilfried Mokwa; Sandra Johnen; Peter Walter
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Optoelectronic Devices for Vision Restoration.

Authors:  Victor Wang; Ajay E Kuriyan
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2020-04-20

Review 10.  Stimulation Strategies for Improving the Resolution of Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Hamish Meffin; David J Garrett; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.