Literature DB >> 29624626

Effect of Software Version on the Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanning Device.

Yasser Haddadi, Golnosh Bahrami, Flemming Isidor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of software version on the accuracy of an intraoral scanning device.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A master tooth was scanned with a high-precision optical scanner and then 10 times with a CEREC Omnicam scanner with software versions 4.4.0 and 4.4.4. Discrepancies were measured using quality control software.
RESULTS: Mean deviation for 4.4.0 was 36.2 ± 35 μm and for 4.4.4 was 20.7 ± 14.2 μm (P ≤ .001).
CONCLUSION: Software version has a significant impact on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner. It is important that researchers also publish the software version of scanners when publishing their findings.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29624626     DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners and Fabrication of CAD/CAM Posts and Cores in a Fully Digital Workflow.

Authors:  Robert Leven; Alexander Schmidt; Roland Binder; Marian Kampschulte; Jonas Vogler; Bernd Wöstmann; Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 2.  Production time, effectiveness and costs of additive and subtractive computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) of implant prostheses: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sven Mühlemann; Jenni Hjerppe; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.021

3.  The effect of the improperly scanned scan body images on the accuracy of virtual implant positioning in computer-aided design software.

Authors:  Se-Won Park; Yong-Do Choi; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  The Effect of Perioral Scan and Artificial Skin Markers on the Accuracy of Virtual Dentofacial Integration: Stereophotogrammetry Versus Smartphone Three-Dimensional Face-Scanning.

Authors:  Hang-Nga Mai; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  A quantitative assessment of silicone and PTFE-based stamp techniques for restoring occlusal anatomy using resin-based composites.

Authors:  Christian Klein; Christiane von Ohle; Diana Wolff; Christian Meller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Effect of scanning-aid agents on the scanning accuracy in specially designed metallic models: A laboratory study.

Authors:  Hyun-Su Oh; Young-Jun Lim; Bongju Kim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon; Yeon-Wha Baek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Effect of Scanning Strategy on Intraoral Scanner's Accuracy.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Gavounelis; Chrysoula-Maria C Gogola; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04

Review 8.  Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review.

Authors:  Kanchan Aswani; Sattyam Wankhade; Arun Khalikar; Suryakant Deogade
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-01-27

9.  Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update.

Authors:  Alexander Schmidt; Leona Klussmann; Bernd Wöstmann; Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry.

Authors:  Çise Erozan; Oğuz Ozan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-01-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.