Literature DB >> 29624181

Identification of gene regulation models from single-cell data.

Lisa Weber1, William Raymond, Brian Munsky.   

Abstract

In quantitative analyses of biological processes, one may use many different scales of models (e.g. spatial or non-spatial, deterministic or stochastic, time-varying or at steady-state) or many different approaches to match models to experimental data (e.g. model fitting or parameter uncertainty/sloppiness quantification with different experiment designs). These different analyses can lead to surprisingly different results, even when applied to the same data and the same model. We use a simplified gene regulation model to illustrate many of these concerns, especially for ODE analyses of deterministic processes, chemical master equation and finite state projection analyses of heterogeneous processes, and stochastic simulations. For each analysis, we employ Matlab and Python software to consider a time-dependent input signal (e.g. a kinase nuclear translocation) and several model hypotheses, along with simulated single-cell data. We illustrate different approaches (e.g. deterministic and stochastic) to identify the mechanisms and parameters of the same model from the same simulated data. For each approach, we explore how uncertainty in parameter space varies with respect to the chosen analysis approach or specific experiment design. We conclude with a discussion of how our simulated results relate to the integration of experimental and computational investigations to explore signal-activated gene expression models in yeast (Neuert et al 2013 Science 339 584-7) and human cells (Senecal et al 2014 Cell Rep. 8 75-83)5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29624181      PMCID: PMC5996816          DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/aabc31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Biol        ISSN: 1478-3967            Impact factor:   2.583


  32 in total

1.  Adaptive explicit-implicit tau-leaping method with automatic tau selection.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Daniel T Gillespie; Linda R Petzold
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  The finite state projection algorithm for the solution of the chemical master equation.

Authors:  Brian Munsky; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Designing experiments to understand the variability in biochemical reaction networks.

Authors:  Jakob Ruess; Andreas Milias-Argeitis; John Lygeros
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Real-time quantification of single RNA translation dynamics in living cells.

Authors:  Tatsuya Morisaki; Kenneth Lyon; Keith F DeLuca; Jennifer G DeLuca; Brian P English; Zhengjian Zhang; Luke D Lavis; Jonathan B Grimm; Sarada Viswanathan; Loren L Looger; Timothee Lionnet; Timothy J Stasevich
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Understanding the finite state projection and related methods for solving the chemical master equation.

Authors:  Khanh N Dinh; Roger B Sidje
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  From analog to digital models of gene regulation.

Authors:  Brian Munsky; Gregor Neuert
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  A systems-level analysis of perfect adaptation in yeast osmoregulation.

Authors:  Dale Muzzey; Carlos A Gómez-Uribe; Jerome T Mettetal; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Listening to the noise: random fluctuations reveal gene network parameters.

Authors:  Brian Munsky; Brooke Trinh; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models.

Authors:  Ryan N Gutenkunst; Joshua J Waterfall; Fergal P Casey; Kevin S Brown; Christopher R Myers; James P Sethna
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Stimulus design for model selection and validation in cell signaling.

Authors:  Joshua F Apgar; Jared E Toettcher; Drew Endy; Forest M White; Bruce Tidor
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  1 in total

1.  BAYESIAN INFERENCE OF STOCHASTIC REACTION NETWORKS USING MULTIFIDELITY SEQUENTIAL TEMPERED MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO.

Authors:  Thomas A Catanach; Huy D Vo; Brian Munsky
Journal:  Int J Uncertain Quantif       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.083

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.