R N Prasad1, J Elson2, J Kharofa2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, UC Health Barrett Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati, 234 Goodman Street, ML 0757, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA. rahul.prasad1122@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, UC Health Barrett Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati, 234 Goodman Street, ML 0757, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Chemoradiation allows for organ preservation in patients with anal cancer, but patients with large tumors (> 5 cm) have elevated rates of locoregional recurrence. With conformal radiation techniques, there is interest in dose escalation to decrease local recurrence in patients with large tumor size. METHODS/PATIENTS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients with anal cancer from 2004 to 2013 with tumors > 5 cm. Adult patients who received definitive chemoradiation were included. Patients with prior resection were excluded. High dose was defined as greater than or equal to 5940 cGy. Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 1349 patients were analyzed with 412 (30.5%) receiving high-dose radiation therapy (RT). 5-year OS was 58 and 60% for high and standard dose RT, respectively (p = 0.9887). On univariate analysis, high-dose RT was not associated with improved OS (HR = 0.998, CI 0.805-1.239, p = 0.9887). On multivariate analysis, high-dose RT (HR = 0.948, CI 0.757-1.187, p = 0.6420) was not associated with improved OS but older age (HR = 1.535, CI 1.233-1.911, p = 0.0001), male sex (HR = 1.695, CI 1.382-2.080, p < 0.0001), comorbidities (HR = 1.389, CI 1.097-1.759, p = 0.0064), and long RT (HR = 1.299, CI 1.047-1.611, p = 0.0173) were significantly associated with decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: There was no observed difference in OS for dose escalation of anal cancers > 5 cm in this population-based analysis. Differences in local control and salvage therapy cannot be assessed through the NCDB. Whether dose escalation of large tumors may improve local control and colostomy-free survival remains an important question and is the subject of ongoing trials.
PURPOSE: Chemoradiation allows for organ preservation in patients with anal cancer, but patients with large tumors (> 5 cm) have elevated rates of locoregional recurrence. With conformal radiation techniques, there is interest in dose escalation to decrease local recurrence in patients with large tumor size. METHODS/PATIENTS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients with anal cancer from 2004 to 2013 with tumors > 5 cm. Adult patients who received definitive chemoradiation were included. Patients with prior resection were excluded. High dose was defined as greater than or equal to 5940 cGy. Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 1349 patients were analyzed with 412 (30.5%) receiving high-dose radiation therapy (RT). 5-year OS was 58 and 60% for high and standard dose RT, respectively (p = 0.9887). On univariate analysis, high-dose RT was not associated with improved OS (HR = 0.998, CI 0.805-1.239, p = 0.9887). On multivariate analysis, high-dose RT (HR = 0.948, CI 0.757-1.187, p = 0.6420) was not associated with improved OS but older age (HR = 1.535, CI 1.233-1.911, p = 0.0001), male sex (HR = 1.695, CI 1.382-2.080, p < 0.0001), comorbidities (HR = 1.389, CI 1.097-1.759, p = 0.0064), and long RT (HR = 1.299, CI 1.047-1.611, p = 0.0173) were significantly associated with decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: There was no observed difference in OS for dose escalation of anal cancers > 5 cm in this population-based analysis. Differences in local control and salvage therapy cannot be assessed through the NCDB. Whether dose escalation of large tumors may improve local control and colostomy-free survival remains an important question and is the subject of ongoing trials.
Authors: Jaffer A Ajani; Kathryn A Winter; Leonard L Gunderson; John Pedersen; Al B Benson; Charles R Thomas; Robert J Mayer; Michael G Haddock; Tyvin A Rich; Christopher G Willett Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stefan Alexander Koerber; Clara Schoneweg; Alla Slynko; David Krug; Matthias F Haefner; Klaus Herfarth; Juergen Debus; Florian Sterzing; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Elena-Sophie Prigge; Miriam Reuschenbach Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-11-22 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Edgar Ben-Josef; Jennifer Moughan; Jaffer A Ajani; Marshall Flam; Leonard Gunderson; JonDavid Pollock; Robert Myerson; Rani Anne; Seth A Rosenthal; Christopher Willett Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Leonard L Gunderson; Jennifer Moughan; Jaffer A Ajani; John E Pedersen; Kathryn A Winter; Al B Benson; Charles R Thomas; Robert J Mayer; Michael G Haddock; Tyvin A Rich; Christopher G Willett Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Irini Youssef; Virginia Osborn; Anna Lee; Evangelia Katsoulakis; Ami Kavi; Kwang Choi; Joseph Safdieh; David Schreiber Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2019-08
Authors: Robert Siegel; Ricardo Niklas Werner; Stephan Koswig; Matthew Gaskins; Claus Rödel; Felix Aigner Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 8.251