Literature DB >> 29622405

Can we refine the management of blunt liver trauma?

L Barbier1, M Calmels2, M Lagadec3, T Gauss4, P-S Abback4, F Cauchy2, M Ronot3, O Soubrane2, C Paugam-Burtz4.   

Abstract

AIM: To describe the management of blunt liver injury and to study the potential relation between delayed complications, type of trauma mechanisms and liver lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective single center study including 116 consecutive patients admitted with blunt liver injury between 2007 and 2015.
RESULTS: Initial CT-scan identified an active bleeding in 33 (28%) patients. AAST (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) grade was 1 to 3 in 82 (71%) patients and equal to 5 in 15 (13%) patients. Eighty (69%) patients had NOM, with a success rate of 96%. Other abdominal organ lesions were associated to invasive initial management. A follow-up CT-scan was useful to detect hepatic and extra-hepatic complications (46 complications in 80 patients), even without clinical or biological abnormalities. Subsequent hepatic complications such as bleeding, pseudo aneurysms, biloma and biliary peritonitis developed in 15 patients and were associated with the severity of blunt liver injury according to AAST classification (3.7±1.0 vs. 3.0±1.1, P=0.010). Total biliary complications occurred in 13 patients and were significantly more frequently observed in patients with injury of central segments 1, 4 and 9 (69% vs. 36%, P=0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-operative management is possible in most blunt liver injury with a success rate of 96%. A systematic CT-scan should be advocated during follow-up, especially when AAST grade is equal or superior to 3. Biliary complications should be suspected when lesions involve segments 1, 4 and 9.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary fistula; CT-scan; Interventional; Liver; Non-operative management; Radiology; Therapeutic embolization; Trauma; Trauma centers

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29622405     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Visc Surg        ISSN: 1878-7886            Impact factor:   2.043


  5 in total

1.  The additional value of the arterial phase in the CT assessment of liver vascular injuries after high-energy blunt trauma.

Authors:  Francesca Iacobellis; Mariano Scaglione; Antonio Brillantino; Maria Giuseppina Scuderi; Francesco Giurazza; Roberto Grassi; Giuseppe Noschese; Raffaella Niola; Naail Yarub Sulaiman Al Zuhir; Luigia Romano
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-08-23

2.  Grade of injury, not initial management, is associated with unplanned interventions in liver injury.

Authors:  Armin Edalatpour; Brian T Young; Laura R Brown; Esther S Tseng; Husayn A Ladhani; Nimitt J Patel; Jeffrey A Claridge; Vanessa P Ho
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Predictive factors of non-operative management failure in 494 blunt liver injuries: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Mathieu Rouy; Clément Julien; Ilyes Hamouda; Damien Massalou; Thierry Bege; Marc Leone; Stephane Berdah; Sandrine Barbois; Edouard Girard; Catherine Arvieux; David Jérémie Birnbaum
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-08-28

Review 4.  Value of repeat CT for nonoperative management of patients with blunt liver and spleen injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khadidja Malloum Boukar; Lynne Moore; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Kahina Soltana; Natalie Yanchar; John Kortbeek; Howard Champion; Julien Clement
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Differences of liver CT perfusion of blunt trauma treated with therapeutic embolization and observation management.

Authors:  Yon-Cheong Wong; Li-Jen Wang; Cheng-Hsien Wu; Huan-Wu Chen; Kuo-Ching Yuan; Yu-Pao Hsu; Being-Chuan Lin; Shih-Ching Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.