| Literature DB >> 29621997 |
M Djanaguiraman1,2, D L Boyle3, R Welti3, S V K Jagadish1, P V V Prasad4.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Anatomy; High temperature; Lipids; Oxidative damage; Photosynthesis; Wheat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29621997 PMCID: PMC5887265 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1263-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Effects of temperature (OT: 25/15 °C: daytime maximum/nighttime minimum temperature and HT: 35/25 °C) during booting stage of wheat genotype Chinese Spring on a chlorophyll index (SAPD units), b thylakoid membrane damage (Fo/Fm ratio; dimensionless), c stomatal conductance (mmol m− 2 s− 1), d photosynthetic rate (μmol m− 2 s− 1), e effective PSII quantum yield (dimensionless), f photochemical quenching (dimensionless), g non-photochemical quenching (dimensionless), and h electron transport rate (μmol e− 1 m− 2 s− 1) of wheat genotype Chinese Spring. Values shown are mean ± SE; n = 10 (two experiments with five replications each, combined). Vertical bars denote ± S.E. of means. OT, optimum temperature; HT, high temperature
Fig. 2Effects of temperature (OT: 25/15 °C: daytime maximum/nighttime minimum temperature and HT: 35/25 °C) during booting stage on a superoxide radical content (Δ optical density min− 1 g− 1), b hydrogen peroxide content (nmol g− 1), c malondialdehyde content (nmol g− 1), d cell membrane damage (%), e superoxide dismutase enzyme activity (enzyme units), f catalase enzyme activity (enzyme units), g peroxidase enzyme activity (enzyme units) and h glutathione peroxidase enzyme activity (enzyme units) of wheat genotype Chinese Spring. Values shown are mean ± SE; n = 10 (two experiments and five replications). Vertical bars denote ± S.E. of means. OT, optimum temperature; HT, high temperature
Total amount of lipid in each head group class in wheat leaves under OT optimal temperature and HT high temperature. Values are means ± standard error (SE; n = 10)
| Polar lipid | OT | HT |
|---|---|---|
| Lipid per dry weight (nmol mg− 1) | ||
| MGDG | 43.3a ± 2.0 | 36.5b ± 5.4 |
| DGDG | 14.8a ± 0.17 | 14.4a ± 0.86 |
| PG | 12.7a ± 0.5 | 11.7b ± 0.7 |
| PC | 15.3a ± 0.009 | 13.5b ± 0.89 |
| PE | 3.7a ± 0.2 | 3.5a ± 0.20 |
| PI | 2.4a ± 0.1 | 2.4a ± 0.1 |
| PA | 0.29a ± 0.03 | 0.23b ± 0.02 |
| PS | 0.28a ± 0.01 | 0.27a ± 0.01 |
| LPG | 0.082a ± 0.1 | 0.069b ± 0.01 |
| LPC | 0.085a ± 0.006 | 0.062b ± 0.005 |
| LPE | 0.067a ± 0.004 | 0.054b ± 0.004 |
| Total polar lipid | 93.2a ± 4.2 | 83.0b ± 9.2 |
MGDG monogalactosyldiacylglycerol, DGDG digalactosyldiacylgylcerol, PG phosphatidylglycerol, PC phosphatidylcholine, PE phosphatidylethanolamine, PI phosphatidylinositol, PA phosphatidic acid, PS phosphatidylserine, LPG lysophosphatidylglycerol, LPC lysophosphatidylcholine, LPE lysophosphatidylethanolamine. All polar lipid classes were represented as mean ± SEM, and the same lower case letter indicates no significant difference at LSD (α < 0.05) level between OT optimal temperature, and HT high temperature; different letters indicate a significant difference
Fig. 3Effects of temperature (OT: 25/15 °C: daytime maximum/nighttime minimum temperature and HT: 35/25 °C) during booting stage on polar lipid molecular species of wheat genotype Chinese Spring (a) PA, phosphatidic acid, (b) PS, phosphatidylserine; (c) PI, phosphatidylinositol; (d) PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; (e) PC, phosphatidylcholine; (f) PG, phosphatidylglycerol; (g) DGDG, digalactosyldiacylglycerol and (h) MGDG, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol. Sampling was on day 10 of the treatment. Values shown are mean ± SE; n = 10 (two experiments with five replications each, combined). Vertical bars denote ± S.E. of means. Means with different letters are significantly different according to the least significant difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05. OT, optimum temperature; HT, high temperature; DBI, double bond (unsaturation) index
Fig. 4Effects of temperature (OT: 25/15 °C: daytime maximum/nighttime minimum temperature and HT: 35/25 °C) during booting stage on lysolipid molecular species of wheat genotype Chinese Spring. (a) LPE, lysophosphatidylethanolamine; (b) LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; and (c) LPG, lysophosphatidylglycerol. Sampling was on day 10 of the treatment. Values shown are mean ± SE; n = 10 (two experiments and five replications each, combined). Vertical bars denote ± S.E. of means. Means with different letters are significantly different according to the least significant difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05. OT, optimum temperature; HT, high temperature; LPG, lysophosphatidylglycerol; DBI, double bond (unsaturation) index
Fig. 5Effects of temperature (OT: 25/15 °C: daytime maximum/nighttime minimum temperature and HT: 35/25 °C) during booting stage on triacylglycerol (TAG) in leaves of wheat genotype Chinese Spring. Sampling was on day 10 of the treatment. No positional specificity of the fatty acyl chains on the glycerol was determined, nor is implied. Values shown are mean ± SE; n = 10 (two experiments and five replications each, combined). Vertical bars denote ± S.E. of means. Means with different letters are significantly different according to the least significant difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05. OT, optimum temperature; HT, high temperature
Fig. 6Effects of temperature (OT: 25/15 °C: daytime maximum/nighttime minimum temperature and HT: 35/25 °C) during booting stage on content of lipids containing oxidized fatty acids (oxidized lipids) in wheat genotype Chinese Spring. Sampling was on day 10 of the treatment. No positional specificity of the fatty acyl chains is implied. Values shown are mean ± SE; n = 10 (two experiments and five replications each, combined). Vertical bars denote ± S.E. of means. Means with different letters are significantly different according to the least significant difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05. OT, optimum temperature; HT, high temperature; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; MGDG, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol
Fig. 7Effects of temperature (OT: 25/15 °C: daytime maximum/nighttime minimum temperature and HT: 35/25 °C) during booting stage on leaf surface morphology. Abaxial surface of OT leaf (a, c, e) and HT stressed leaf (b, d, f) showing the disintegration of wax and closure of stomata. Similarly, the adaxial surface of OT (g, i, k) and HT stressed leaf (h, j, l) showing the integration of wax and closure of stomata. Arrows indicate disintegrated wax and closed stomata under HT stress. The corresponding information in OT is indicated by *. The decreased mesophyll thickness under HT stress is shown in (n) and its corresponding OT was shown as (m). The vascular bundle size and morphology of OT and HT was shown in (o) and (p), respectively. OT, optimum temperature; HT, high temperature
Fig. 8Effects of temperature (OT: 25/15 °C: daytime maximum/nighttime minimum temperature and HT: 35/25 °C) during booting stage on leaf ultrastructure. The OT (a, c, e, g, i, k, m, o) and HT (b, d, f, h, j, l, n, p) leaf images were showing the normal (*) and abnormal or damaged (arrow) cell organelles. The image (b) showing the disintegration of cellular membrane, (d) disintegration of wax layer, (f) disintegration of chloroplast membrane, (h) disintegration of thylakoid membrane, (j) disintegration of mitochondrial membrane. The image (l) showing the heterochromation, (n) detached endoplasmic reticulum, and (p) plastoglobule accumulation under HT stress. The corresponding normal structure is shown as *. OT, optimum temperature; HT, high temperature
Fig. 9Effects of temperature (OT: 25/15 °C: daytime maximum/nighttime minimum temperature and HT: 35/25 °C) during booting stage on (a) stem dry weight (g plant− 1), (b) seed-set percentage, (c) seed size (mg seed− 1), and (d) seed yield (g plant− 1) of wheat genotype Chinese Spring. Values shown are mean ± SE; n = 20 (two experiments and ten replications each, combined). Vertical bars denote ± S.E. of means. Means with different letters are significantly different according to the least significant difference (LSD) test at P < 0.05. OT, optimum temperature; HT, high temperature
Top five lipid species correlated with grain yield plant−1 under OT optimum temperature and HT high temperature conditions
| Relationship | Lipid species | Spearman’s correlation coefficient |
|---|---|---|
| Lipids positively associated with yield | PC(36:6) | 0.85 |
| LysoPC(18:3) | 0.84 | |
| PE(42:3) | 0.84 | |
| PC(34:4) | 0.81 | |
| PI(36:6) | 0.79 | |
| Lipids negatively associated with yield | MGDG(36:4) | −0.94 |
| MGDG(36:3) | −0.92 | |
| PG(32:1) | −0.92 | |
| MGDG(34:3) | −0.92 | |
| DGDG(34:1) | −0.91 |
OT optimum temperature, HT high temperature