Paul E Cohen1, Alicia Sufrinko1, Robert J Elbin2, Michael W Collins1, Aaron M Sinnott3, Anthony P Kontos1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Sports Medicine Concussion Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Office for Sport Concussion Research, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas. 3. Department of Sports Medicine and Nutrition, Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Warrior Human Performance Research Center, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Symptom factors present during the first week following concussion may predict subsequent concussion outcomes and recovery duration. We hypothesized that a high loading on cognitive-fatigue-migraine and somatic factors would be predictive of neurocognitive impairment following concussion. We also hypothesized that the affective factor would be related to vestibular symptoms and impairment. DESIGN: Prospective repeated measures. SETTING: Concussion specialty clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Athletes aged 13 to 20 years diagnosed with a concussion within the past 7 days. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Symptom factors at the initial visit 1 to 7 days after injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Symptom factor score, neurocognitive testing, and vestibular/ocular motor assessment at the second visit (2-4 weeks after injury). RESULTS: The somatic symptom factor from the initial visit was significant (P < 0.05) in all vestibular/ocular screening components (P < 0.05) but not neurocognitive test performance (P > 0.05) at the second visit. The cognitive-migraine-fatigue and affective symptom factors predicted symptom burden at the second visit (P < 0.001) but did not predict recovery time (P = 0.200). CONCLUSIONS: The somatic symptom factor during the first week after injury predicted symptom provocation during vestibular/ocular screening at 2 to 4 weeks after injury. Specifically, higher scores on somatic symptom factor at the initial visit predicted worse symptom reporting for all vestibular/ocular screening components at the second visit. Patients with higher scores on the cognitive-migraine-fatigue and affective symptom factors at the initial visit predicted total symptom burden at the second visit.
OBJECTIVE: Symptom factors present during the first week following concussion may predict subsequent concussion outcomes and recovery duration. We hypothesized that a high loading on cognitive-fatigue-migraine and somatic factors would be predictive of neurocognitive impairment following concussion. We also hypothesized that the affective factor would be related to vestibular symptoms and impairment. DESIGN: Prospective repeated measures. SETTING: Concussion specialty clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Athletes aged 13 to 20 years diagnosed with a concussion within the past 7 days. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: Symptom factors at the initial visit 1 to 7 days after injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Symptom factor score, neurocognitive testing, and vestibular/ocular motor assessment at the second visit (2-4 weeks after injury). RESULTS: The somatic symptom factor from the initial visit was significant (P < 0.05) in all vestibular/ocular screening components (P < 0.05) but not neurocognitive test performance (P > 0.05) at the second visit. The cognitive-migraine-fatigue and affective symptom factors predicted symptom burden at the second visit (P < 0.001) but did not predict recovery time (P = 0.200). CONCLUSIONS: The somatic symptom factor during the first week after injury predicted symptom provocation during vestibular/ocular screening at 2 to 4 weeks after injury. Specifically, higher scores on somatic symptom factor at the initial visit predicted worse symptom reporting for all vestibular/ocular screening components at the second visit. Patients with higher scores on the cognitive-migraine-fatigue and affective symptom factors at the initial visit predicted total symptom burden at the second visit.
Authors: Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos; Erin Reynolds; Christopher D Murawski; Freddie H Fu Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos; David O Okonkwo; Jon Almquist; Julian Bailes; Mark Barisa; Jeffrey Bazarian; O Josh Bloom; David L Brody; Robert Cantu; Javier Cardenas; Jay Clugston; Randall Cohen; Ruben Echemendia; R J Elbin; Richard Ellenbogen; Janna Fonseca; Gerard Gioia; Kevin Guskiewicz; Robert Heyer; Gillian Hotz; Grant L Iverson; Barry Jordan; Geoffrey Manley; Joseph Maroon; Thomas McAllister; Michael McCrea; Anne Mucha; Elizabeth Pieroth; Kenneth Podell; Matthew Pombo; Teena Shetty; Allen Sills; Gary Solomon; Danny G Thomas; Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Tony Yates; Ross Zafonte Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: William P Meehan; Rebekah C Mannix; Andrea Stracciolini; R J Elbin; Michael W Collins Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Jacob E Resch; Cathleen N Brown; Stephen N Macciocchi; C Munro Cullum; Damond Blueitt; Michael S Ferrara Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Kelly L Pearce; Alicia Sufrinko; Brian C Lau; Luke Henry; Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Noah D Silverberg; Bradley J Hallam; Alice Rose; Heather Underwood; Kevin Whitfield; Allen E Thornton; Maureen L Whittal Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.710