| Literature DB >> 29619146 |
Ana Beatriz Farias de Souza1, Máira Tereza Talma Chírico1, Christiane Teixeira Cartelle2, Guilherme de Paula Costa1, André Talvani1, Sílvia Dantas Cangussú1, Rodrigo Cunha Alvim de Menezes1, Frank Silva Bezerra1.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effects of a high-fat diet and mechanical ventilation on the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response in C57BL/6 mice. Male C57BL/6 mice were divided into two groups: one received a standard diet, and the other received a high-fat diet. After 10 weeks, the groups were further divided into two groups each: control group (CG), mechanical ventilation group (MVG), diet group (DG), and diet mechanical ventilation group (DMVG). MVG and DMVG underwent mechanical ventilation for 60 minutes. All animals were euthanized for subsequent analysis. Animals receiving a high-fat diet presented higher body mass, adipose index, and greater adipocyte area. In the lung, the expression of HMGB1 was greater in DG and DMVG than in CG and MVG. CCL2 and IL-22 levels in MVG and DMVG were increased compared to those in CG and DG, whereas IL-10 and IL-17 were decreased. Superoxide dismutase activity was higher in MVG and DMVG than in CG. Catalase activity was lower in DG than in CG, and in MV groups, it was lower than that in CG and DG. MV and obesity promote inflammation and pulmonary oxidative stress in adult C57BL/6 mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29619146 PMCID: PMC5830287 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7457054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Effects of the hyperlipidic diet on body mass and adipose tissue. (a) Body mass gain over the 10-week experiment. (b) Body adiposity index. (c) Area of adipocytes. (d) Histological section of epididymal adipose tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Bar = 100 μm. For (a), data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 20). (a) represents difference compared to the control group p < 0.05 using two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni posttest. For (b) and (c), (A) and (C) represent a significant difference in relation to CG and MVG. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 10). Analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest (p < 0.05).
Total and differential evaluation of blood cells from experimental groups.
| CG | DG | MVG | DMVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leukocytes (×103/mL) | 2.61 ± 0.37 | 2.14 ± 0.22 | 4.72 ± 0.35a,b | 3.90 ± 0.36a,b |
| Lymphocytes (×103/mL) | 2.36 ± 0.29 | 1.76 ± 0.20 | 2.15 ± 0.22 | 2.02 ± 0.20 |
| Neutrophils (×103/mL) | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.01a,b,d | 0.38 ± 0.05a,b |
| Monocytes (×103/mL) | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.04 | 1.65 ± 0.29a,b | 1.50 ± 0.20a,b |
(a) represents significant difference between groups when compared to CG. (b) represents significant difference between groups when compared to DG. (d) represents significant difference between groups when compared to DMVG. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 10) and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest (p < 0.05). CG: control group; DG: diet group; MVG: mechanical ventilation group; DMVG: diet mechanical ventilation group.
Effects of diet and mechanical ventilation on cell recruitment to BALF.
| CG | DG | MVG | DMVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leukocytes (×103/mL) | 83.33 ± 4.41 | 119.00 ± 5.04a | 204.4 ± 6.47a,b | 228.0 ± 9.31a,b,c |
| Macrophages (×103/mL) | 78.46 ± 5.30 | 108.40 ± 4.74a | 178.30 ± 7.03a,b | 199.97 ± 8.80a,b |
| Neutrophils (×103/mL) | 1.61 ± 0.35 | 1.92 ± 0.37 | 8.00 ± 1.52a,b | 8.13 ± 1.10a,b |
| Lymphocytes (×103/mL) | 3.26 ± 0.52 | 8.68 ± 1.01 | 18.10 ± 2.30a,b | 19.90 ± 2.45a,b |
(a) represents significant difference between groups when compared to CG. (b) represents significant difference between groups when compared to DG. (c) represents significant difference between groups when compared to MVG. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 10) and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest (p < 0.05). CG: control group; DG: diet group; MVG: mechanical ventilation group; DMVG: diet mechanical ventilation group.
Biomarkers of inflammation on pulmonary parenchyma.
| CG | DG | MVG | DMVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCL2 (pg/mL) | 536.6 ± 95.15 | 446.7 ± 108.2 | 1896 ± 273.9a,b | 1465 ± 237.6a,b |
| CCL5(pg/mL) | 334.4 ± 56.37 | 176.4 ± 30.36 | 258.8 ± 69.23 | 316.5 ± 39.74 |
| IL-17 (pg/mL) | 1065 ± 33.61 | 1060 ± 31.40 | 790.9 ± 26.78a,b | 884.2 ± 52.74a,b |
| IL-22 (pg/mL) | 185.8 ± 38.4 | 207.6 ± 50.18 | 753 ± 96.97a,b | 619.9 ± 95.65a,b |
| IL-10 (pg/mL) | 3543 ± 150.70 | 3367 ± 99.34 | 2436 ± 33.12a,b | 2820 ± 67.87a,b |
(a) represents significant difference between groups when compared to CG. (b) represents significant difference between groups when compared to DG. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 10) and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest (p < 0.05). CG: control group; DG: diet group; MVG: mechanical ventilation group; DMVG: diet mechanical ventilation group; IL-10: interleukin-10; IL-17: interleukin-17; IL-22: interleukin-22.
Biomarkers of oxidative stress on pulmonary parenchyma.
| CG | DG | MVG | DMVG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD (U/mg ptn) | 23.33 ± 1.98 | 28.83 ± 3.60 | 43.33 ± 7.18a | 37.32 ± 2.19a |
| CAT (U/mg ptn) | 1.01 ± 0.06 | 0.57 ± 0.07a | 0.19 ± 0.02a,b | 0.13 ± 0.01a,b |
| GSH/GSSG ratio | 6.38 ± 1.64 | 5.47 ± 0.60 | 1.97 ± 0.18a | 5.05 ± 1.52 |
| TBARS (nmol/mg ptn) | 2.42 ± 0.27 | 2.16 ± 0.21 | 5.85 ± 1.11a,b,d | 2.77 ± 0.32 |
| Protein carbonyl (nmol/mg ptn) | 4.74 ± 0.89 | 3.45 ± 0.37 | 14.20 ± 1.64a,b | 18.46 ± 4.34a,b |
(a) represents significant difference between groups when compared to CG. (b) represents significant difference between groups when compared to DG. (d) represents significant difference between groups when compared to DMVG. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 10) and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest (p < 0.05). CG: control group; DG: diet group; MVG: mechanical ventilation group; DMVG: diet mechanical ventilation group; CAT: catalase; GSH: glutathione reduced; GSSG: glutathione oxidized; SOD: superoxide dismutase; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.
Figure 2Immunohistochemistry for HMGB1. (a) Ratio between the number of nuclei labeled for HMGB1 antibody and the total number of nuclei. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 10). (A) and (C) represent a significant difference in relation to CG and MVG (p < 0.05) using Kruskal-Wallis analysis followed by Dunn's posttest. (b) Histological section of lung parenchyma stained by immunohistochemical technique. Bar = 100 μm. The arrows point to marked nuclei.
Figure 3Stereological analyses of lung sections. (a) Volume density of alveolar septa. (b) Volume density of alveolar airspace. (c) Histological section of lung parenchyma stained with H&E. Bar = 50 μm.