| Literature DB >> 29619078 |
Haijian Yang1, Qiaoning He1,2, Chunxiang Hu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Compared with other general energy crops, microalgae are more compatible with desert conditions. In addition, microalgae cultivated in desert regions can be used to develop biodiesel. Therefore, screening oil-rich microalgae, and researching the algae growth, CO2 fixation and oil yield in desert areas not only effectively utilize the idle desertification lands and other resources, but also reduce CO2 emission.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 fixation; Desert area; Evaporation; Lipid production; Microalgae; Open raceway ponds; Semi-continuous culture
Year: 2018 PMID: 29619078 PMCID: PMC5879568 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1068-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Biomass, lipid content (a), and CO2 fixation rate (b) of M. dybowskii LB50, Micractinium sp. XJ-2, and P. falcata XJ-176 in 5 m2 ORPs. DW dry weight, LC lipid content
Fig. 2Monoraphidium dybowskii LB50 cultivated via NaCl and industrial salt induction in 5 m2 ORPs. Biomass and lipid content (a), pH and water temperature (b), irradiance (c), and conductance (d)
LC, VBP, ABP, VLP, ALP, and CO2 fixation rate of M. dybowskii LB50 under two-stage induction culture in 5 m2 ORPs
| 0–11 days | 0–12 days | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | NaCl induced | Industrial salt induced | Control | NaCl induced | Inustrial salt induced | |
| LC (%) | 30.95 ± 0.83 | 37.31 ± 0.79 | 37.70 ± 0.89 | 31.05 ± 0.79 | 41.48 ± 0.95 | 39.46 ± 0.94 |
| VBP (mg L−1 day−1) | 44.02 ± 1.90 | 44.46 ± 2.96 | 43.55 ± 2.78 | 43.00 ± 0.54 | 41.04 ± 1.87 | 40.20 ± 0.02 |
| ABP (g m−2 day−1) | 8.80 ± 0.38 | 8.89 ± 0.79 | 8.71 ± 0.56 | 8.60 ± 0.11 | 8.21 ± 0.37 | 8.04 ± 0.09 |
| VLP (mg L−1 day−1) | 13.62 ± 0.16 | 16.59 ± 0.23 | 16.42 ± 0.25 | 13.35 ± 0.04 | 17.02 ± 0.18 | 15.86 ± 0.25 |
| ALP (g m−2 day−1) | 2.72 ± 0.31 | 3.32 ± 0.06 | 3.28 ± 0.49 | 2.67 ± 0.01 | 3.41 ± 0.06 | 3.17 ± 0.01 |
| CO2 fixation rate (mg L−1 day−1) | 78.94 ± 3.40 | 79.74 ± 5.31 | 78.11 ± 4.98 | 77.11 ± 0.96 | 73.59 ± 3.36 | 72.11 ± 1.21 |
| CO2 fixation rate (g m−2 day−1) | 15.79 ± 0.68 | 15.95 ± 1.06 | 15.62 ± 1.00 | 15.42 ± 0.19 | 14.72 ± 0.67 | 14.42 ± 0.09 |
VBP volume biomass productivity, ABP areal biomass productivity, VLP volume lipid productivity, ALP areal lipid productivity, LC lipid content
Fig. 3Biomass and lipid content (a), irradiance and evaporation (b), pH and water temperature (c), and CO2 fixation rate (d) of M. dybowskii LB50 under semi-continuous mode in the 5 m2 ORP. DW dry weight, LC lipid content
LC, VBP, ABP, VLP, ALP, and CO2 fixation rate of M. dybowskii LB50 under semi-continuous mode in 5 m2 ORPs
| 0–10 days | 11–13 days | 14–16 days | 0–16 days | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LC (%) | 30.48 ± 0.67 | 31.15 ± 0.89 | 30.9 ± 0.74 | 30.84 ± 0.34 |
| VBP (mg L−1 day−1) | 44.86 ± 2.1 | 72.32 ± 3.51 | 74.16 ± 2.25 | 63.78 ± 3.05 |
| ABP (g m−2 day−1) | 8.97 ± 0.23 | 14.46 ± 0.19 | 14.83 ± 0.26 | 12.75 ± 0.23 |
| VLP (mg L−1 day−1) | 13.67 ± 0.64 | 22.53 ± 1.09 | 22.87 ± 0.7 | 19.66 ± 0.94 |
| ALP (g m−2 day−1) | 2.73 ± 0.07 | 4.51 ± 0.06 | 4.58 ± 0.08 | 3.93 ± 0.07 |
| CO2 fixation rate (mg L−1 day−1) | 80.54 ± 3.77 | 129.87 ± 6.29 | 133.65 ± 4.04 | 114.47 ± 5.47 |
| CO2 fixation rate (g m−2 day−1) | 16.09 ± 0.41 | 24.75 ± 0.34 | 26.73 ± 0.47 | 23.1 ± 0.41 |
Fig. 4Time course profiles of dry weight, biomass productivity, lipid content (a), CO2 fixation rate, evaporation (b), water temperature, light intensity (c), and urea concentration (d) of M. dybowskii LB50 grown under semi-continuous mode in the 200 m2 ORP
LC, VBP, ABP, VLP, ALP, and CO2 fixation rate of M. dybowskii LB50 grown under semi-continuous mode in 200 m2 ORP
| LC (%) | VBP (mg L−1 day−1) | ABP (g m−2 day−1) | VLP (mg L−1 day−1) | ALP (g m−2 day−1) | CO2 fixation rate (mg L−1 day−1) | CO2 fixation rate (g m−2 day−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–7 days | 30.38 ± 0.35 | 76.02 ± 46.42 | 15.21 ± 9.28 | 23.09 ± 1.62 | 4.62 ± 0.33 | 136.35 ± 83.08 | 27.27 ± 16.64 |
| 8–10 days | 29.96 ± 1.31 | 133.79 ± 45.77 | 26.76 ± 9.15 | 40.08 ± 5.99 | 8.01 ± 1.19 | 239.93 ± 82.08 | 47.98 ± 16.41 |
| 11–12 days | 31.33 ± 0.41 | 64.54 ± 9.49 | 12.91 ± 1.89 | 20.22 ± 0.37 | 4.04 ± 0.08 | 115.73 ± 17.03 | 23.14 ± 3.41 |
| 13–15 days | 29.37 ± 0.66 | 139.17 ± 22.27 | 27.83 ± 4.45 | 40.87 ± 1.49 | 8.17 ± 0.29 | 249.57 ± 39.95 | 49.92 ± 7.99 |
| 16–20 days | 27.01 ± 3.66 | 77.40 ± 8.80 | 15.48 ± 1.97 | 20.91 ± 3.61 | 4.18 ± 0.72 | 138.81 ± 15.79 | 27.76 ± 3.15 |
| 21–26 days | 25.58 ± 0.62 | 58.44 ± 12.17 | 11.69 ± 2.43 | 14.95 ± 0.75 | 1.99 ± 0.15 | 104.81 ± 21.82 | 20.96 ± 4.36 |
| 0–20 days | 29.61 ± 1.62 | 94.41 ± 4.37 | 18.88 ± 2.73 | 27.95 ± 0.07 | 5.59 ± 0.04 | 169.29 ± 78.33 | 33.86 ± 15.67 |
| 0–26 days | 28.44 ± 1.27 | 85.77 ± 17.49 | 17.15 ± 3.49 | 24.39 ± 2.12 | 4.88 ± 0.42 | 153.82 ± 31.31 | 30.76 ± 6.29 |
Fig. 5Biomass productivity and lipid content (a), CO2 fixation rate and evaporation (b) of M. dybowskii LB50 under 200 m2 ORP in 3 years
Comparisons of biomass and lipid productivity of different sizes in some microalgae outdoors (culture volume > 100 L)
| Strains | LC (%) | VBP (mg L−1 day−1) | ABP (g m−2 day−1) | VLP (mg L−1 day−1) | ALP (g m−2 day−1) | CO2 fixation rate | Bioreactor volume (L) | Culture | Location | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg L−1 day−1) | (g m−2 day−1) | ||||||||||
|
| 18.6 | 590 | 15.4 | 110 | 2.9 | 1109a | 28.9 | TPs (340) | Dilution rate | Spain | [ |
| 17.1 | 460 | 12.1 | 78.7 | 2.1 | 864.8a | 22.8 | Nutrient | ||||
| 43 | 256 | 110 | 481.3a | GWP (590) | Nitrogen | Italy | [ | ||||
| 34.8 | 238 | 83 | 447a | BPs (120) | Batch | Australia | [ | ||||
|
| 32 | 51.5 | 14.8 | 97a | CO2 | [ | |||||
|
| 13.4 | 135 | 11.3 | 19 | 1.6 | 253.8a | 21.3 | HTP (500) | Semi-continuous | UK | [ |
| 28 | 16.75 | 4.69 | 31.50a | RCS (8000) | Flue gas | Shandong, China | [ | ||||
| 35.12 | 44.00 | 9.70 | 10.70 | 3.80 | 82.70a | 18.20 | OPs (300, 1.4 m2) | CO2 | India | [ | |
|
| 13.8 | 4 | 0.6 | 7.6 | RCS (9000) | Normal | USA | [ | |||
|
| 16.33 | 204.2 | 24.5 | 33.3 | 4 | 383.9a | 46.1 | RCS (300) | CO2 | Israel | [ |
|
| 34.7 | 160 | 55.5 | 300.8a | AGSp (174,000) | Normol | USA | [ | |||
| 169 | 33.8 | 8.2-13.0 | 317.7a | 63.5 | RCS (5000, 25 m2) | Semi-continuous | Malaysia | [ | |||
|
| 24 | 100 | 24c | 188a | RCS (80) | Batch | India | [ | |||
| 31.8 | 43.5 | 8.7 | 14.5 | 2.9 | 81.8a | 16.4 | RCS (40,000, 200 m2) | Batch (CO2) | Yunnan, China | [ | |
|
| 25.6 | 190 | 10.3–22.4 | 30.4 | 2.6–5.7 | 357.2a | 19.4 | RCS (792, 7.2 m2) | Continuous | Spain | [ |
| 21.5 | 42.9 | 3.5 | 9.2 | 0.8 | 80.7a | 6.6 | RCS (2278, 10 m2) | Batch | USA | [ | |
| 34.9 | 243 | 48.6 | 85 | 17 | 456.8a | 31.9 | RCS (200, 1 m2) | Batch | Australia | [ | |
| 205.1 | 83.9d | 358.8b | Tubular (60) | Batch | Taiwan, China | [ | |||||
| 119.2 | 47.3d | 208.7b | Tubular (60) | Batch | Taiwan, China | ||||||
| 29.9 | 89.5 | 17.9 | 26.7 | 5.3 | 148.1b | 29.6 | RCS (40,000, 200 m2) | Semi-continuous | Inner Mongolia, China | [ | |
| 38.6 | 81.4 | 21.7 | 32.5 | 8.6 | 153.1b | 40.8 | Plastic bag (140 L) | NaCl-induced | Beijing, China | [ | |
| 30.34 | 50.1 | 10 | 15.2 | 3 | 89.9b | 18.0 | RCS | Batch | Inner Mongolia, China | This study | |
| 30 | 90.6 | 18.1 | 27.2 | 5.4 | 162.5b | 32.5 | RCS | Semi-continuous | |||
TPs tubular photobioreactors, GWP green wall panel, BPs bag photobioreactors, HTP horizontal tubular photobioreactor, TLP thin-layer photobioreactor, RCS raceway cultivation system, AGSp algae growth system photobioreactor, OPs open ponds
aCalculated from the following equation: CO2 fixation rate = biomass productivity (mg L−1 day−1) × 1.88
bCalculated from the following equation: CO2 fixation rate = biomass productivity (mg L−1 day−1) × C (%) × 44/12
cFor hydrocarbon
dFor carbohydrate
Comparative energy analyses for biomass or bio-oil production based on 1 year of cultivating M. dybowskii LB50 via different culture modes under OPRs
| Variable | 5 m2 | 200 m2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batch | Induction | Semi-continuous | Batch | Semi-continuous | |
| Annual biomass production (kg year−1) | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 |
| Volumetric productivity (g L−1 day−1) or (kg m−3day−1)a | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| Illuminated areal productivity (kg m−2 day−1)a | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Reactor volume (m3)b | 8413.68 | 8504.49 | 5513.10 | 4700.13 | 4087.97 |
| Occupied area (m2) | 42,087.54 | 42,522.43 | 27,557.32 | 23,500.66 | 20,439.87 |
| Lipid content (%)a | 30.85 | 39.39 | 30.84 | 30.13 | 30.13 |
| Energy consumption for stirring (W m−3)c | 3.72–12.5 | 3.72–12.5 | 3.72–12.5 | 3.72–12.5 | 3.72–12.5 |
| Total energy for stirring (kWh months−1)d | 7511.7–25,241.1 | 7592.8–25,513.4 | 4922.1–16,539.3 | 4196.2–14,100.3 | 3649.7–12,263.9 |
| Total energy for biomass drying (kWh year−1)e | 53,900.00 | 53,900.00 | 53,900.00 | 53,900.00 | 53,900.00 |
| Total energy for oil recovery (kWh year−1)f | 34,534.00 | 34,534.00 | 34,534.00 | 34,534.00 | 34,534.00 |
| Total energy consumption for producing biomass | 437.42–1011.85 | 440.05–1020.68 | 353.52–729.91 | 330–650.89 | 312.29–591.39 |
| Total energy consumption for producing oil (GJ year−1) | 561.74–1136.17 | 564.37–1145 | 477.84–854.24 | 454.32–775.22 | 436.61–715.71 |
| Energy produced as oil (GJ year−1)g | 1204.3 | 1537.8 | 1203.9 | 1176.3 | 1176.3 |
| Energy produced as 100,000 kg biomass (GJ year−1)h | 3155.33 | 3155.33 | 3155.33 | 3155.33 | 3155.33 |
| NER for oil productioni | 2.14–1.06 | 2.72–1.34 | 2.52–1.41 | 2.59–1.52 | 2.69–1.64 |
| NER for biomass production | 7.21–3.12 | 7.17–3.09 | 8.93–4.32 | 9.56–4.85 | 10.1–5.34 |
| Energy consumption for oil (MJ kg−1 bio-oil) | 17.86–36.13 | 14.06–28.52 | 15.2–27.17 | 14.79–25.24 | 14.22–23.3 |
| Energy consumption for oil (MJ MJ−1 bio-oil) | 0.47–0.94 | 0.37–0.74 | 0.4–0.71 | 0.39–0.66 | 0.37–0.61 |
The assumed annual biomass production is 100,000 kg
aData were based on this study
bDetermined by dividing the illuminated area actual by production the volume of each unit
c3.72 W m−3 from Jorquera et al. [23]. 12.5 W m−3 from the actual date for the 200 m2 raceway pond
dIncludes 8 h of daily pumping
eStepan et al. [52]. 539 kWh ton−1 biomass
fStephenson et al. [53]; Gao et al. [54]. 345.34 kWh ton−1 biomass
gEnergy content of net oil yield (assumed value of 39.04 MJ kg−1); Jorquera et al. [23]
hEnergy content of net biomass yield (assumed value of 31.55 MJ kg−1); Jorquera et al. [23]
iNER would be above 1 if including coproduct allocation [55]
Fig. 6Comparative energy analyses for bio-oil production based on 1 year of M. dybowskii LB50 cultivation via different culture modes in 5 m2 ORPs (a), and 200 m2 ORPs (b). The assumed annual biomass production is 100,000 kg