Literature DB >> 29618962

Development of Hospital-based Data Sets as a Vehicle for Implementation of a National Electronic Health Record.

Leila Keikha1, Seyede Sedigheh Seied Farajollah1, Reza Safdari2, Marjan Ghazisaeedi2, Niloofar Mohammadzadeh2.   

Abstract

Background: In developing countries such as Iran, international standards offer good sources to survey and use for appropriate planning in the domain of electronic health records (EHRs). Therefore, in this study, HL7 and ASTM standards were considered as the main sources from which to extract EHR data. Objective: The objective of this study was to propose a hospital data set for a national EHR consisting of data classes and data elements by adjusting data sets extracted from the standards and paper-based records. Method: This comparative study was carried out in 2017 by studying the contents of the paper-based records approved by the health ministry in Iran and the international ASTM and HL7 standards in order to extract a minimum hospital data set for a national EHR.
Results: As a result of studying the standards and paper-based records, a total of 526 data elements in 174 classes were extracted. An examination of the data indicated that the highest number of extracted data came from the free text elements, both in the paper-based records and in the standards related to the administrative data. The major sources of data extracted from ASTM and HL7 were the E1384 and Hl7V.x standards, respectively. In the paper-based records, data were extracted from 19 forms sporadically. Discussion: By declaring the confidentiality of information, the ASTM standards acknowledge the issue of confidentiality of information as one of the main challenges of EHR development, and propose new types of admission, such as teleconference, tele-video, and home visit, which are inevitable with the advent of new technology for providing healthcare and treating diseases. Data related to finance and insurance, which were scattered in different categories by three organizations, emerged as the financial category. Documenting the role and responsibility of the provider by adding the authenticator/signature data element was deemed essential.
Conclusion: Not only using well-defined and standardized data, but also adapting EHR systems to the local facilities and the existing social and cultural conditions, will facilitate the development of structured data sets.

Keywords:  comparative study; data set; electronic health record; hospital data

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29618962      PMCID: PMC5869443     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag        ISSN: 1559-4122


  17 in total

1.  Validation of the Minimum Data Set in identifying hospitalization events and payment source.

Authors:  Shubing Cai; Dana B Mukamel; Peter Veazie; Helena Temkin-Greener
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 4.669

2.  Towards semantic interoperability for electronic health records.

Authors:  Sebastian Garde; Petra Knaup; Evelyn Hovenga; Sam Heard
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Analysis and evaluation of the Electronic Health Record standard in China: a comparison with the American national standard ASTM E 1384.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Zhiyu Guan; Hongxin Cao; Haiyan Zhang; Min Lu; Tiejun Li
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Joshua C Denny; Hua Xu; Nancy Lorenzi; William W Stead; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  ACCF/AHA 2011 key data elements and definitions of a base cardiovascular vocabulary for electronic health records: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards.

Authors:  William S Weintraub; Ronald P Karlsberg; James E Tcheng; Jeffrey R Boris; Alfred E Buxton; James T Dove; Gregg C Fonarow; Lee R Goldberg; Paul Heidenreich; Robert C Hendel; Alice K Jacobs; William Lewis; Michael J Mirro; David M Shahian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Enhancement of interoperability of disaster-related data collection using Disaster Nursing Minimum Data Set.

Authors:  Christine Spisla
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2009

7.  Development a minimum data set of the information management system for burns.

Authors:  Maryam Ahmadi; Jahanpour Alipour; Ali Mohammadi; Farid Khorami
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 2.744

8.  Linking clinical registry data with administrative data using indirect identifiers: implementation and validation in the congenital heart surgery population.

Authors:  Sara K Pasquali; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Gregory J Shook; Sean M O'Brien; Matthew Hall; Marshall L Jacobs; Karl F Welke; J William Gaynor; Eric D Peterson; Samir S Shah; Jennifer S Li
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Assessing the accuracy of administrative data in health information systems.

Authors:  John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Sharad Jain; Dan Bertenthal; Peter Glassman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Building a robust, scalable and standards-driven infrastructure for secondary use of EHR data: the SHARPn project.

Authors:  Susan Rea; Jyotishman Pathak; Guergana Savova; Thomas A Oniki; Les Westberg; Calvin E Beebe; Cui Tao; Craig G Parker; Peter J Haug; Stanley M Huff; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 6.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.