| Literature DB >> 29618954 |
Yabin Gong1,2, Zhenye Xu1,3, Changjuan Jin4, Haibin Deng1, Zhongqi Wang1, Weidong Zhou1, Ming Zhang4, Xiaozhen Zhao1, Lifang Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of qi-nourishing essence-replenishing Chinese herbal medicine combined with chemotherapy in survival of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients with essence and qi deficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Chemotherapy; Chinese herbal medicine; Essence and qi deficiency; Non-small-cell lung cancer; Qi-nourishing essence-replenishing
Year: 2018 PMID: 29618954 PMCID: PMC5878937 DOI: 10.1186/s12575-018-0074-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Proced Online ISSN: 1480-9222 Impact factor: 3.244
Standard formula of Kang Liu Zeng Xiao decoction
| Chinese name | Pharmaceutical name | Crude drug content (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Huang Qi |
| 30 |
| Huang Jing | Polygonatum sibiricum | 30 |
| Jiao Gu Lan | Gynostemma pentaphyllum | 15 |
| Ling Zhi | Ganoderma lucidum | 24 |
| Cang Zhu | Atractylodes chinensis | 9 |
| Nv Zhen Zi |
| 15 |
| Huang Lian | Coptis chinensis | 6 |
Standard formula of Fei Yan Ning decoction
| Chinese name | Pharmaceutical name | Crude drug content (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Sheng Huang Qi | Astragalus mongholicus | 40 |
| Huang Jing | Polygonatum sibiricum | 30 |
| Shan Zhu Yu | Cornus Oycinalis | 15 |
| Ling Zhi | Ganoderma lucidum | 30 |
| Yin Yang Huo | Epimedium davidii Franch | 30 |
| Nv Zhen Zi | Ligustrum lucidum | 15 |
| Bai Zhu | Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae | 9 |
| Feng Fang | Comb | 9 |
| Shan Ci Gu | Pseudobulbus Cremastraeseu Pleiones | 15 |
| Gan Chan Pi | Toad Skin | 9 |
| Chong Lou | Paris polyphylla Smith | 15 |
| Shi Jian Chuan | Chinese Sage Herb | 30 |
Standard formula of modified Jupi Zhuru decoction
| Chinese name | Pharmaceutical name | Crude drug content (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Dang Shen |
| 15 |
| Chen Pi | Pericarpium citri reticulatae | 9 |
| Jiang Ban Xia |
| 9 |
| Jiang Zhuru | 9 | |
| Da Zao | Zizyphus jujuba | 9 |
| Gan Cao | Glycyrrhiza uralensis | 6 |
Standard formula of symptom-oriented decoction
| Chinese name | Pharmaceutical name | Crude drug content (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Xing Ren | Apricot kernel | 9 |
| Lu Gen | Reed rhizome | 30 |
| Pi Pa Ye | Folia eriobotryae | 9 |
| Dan Shen | Salvia miltrorrhiza | 15 |
| Bai Hua She She Cao | Herba hedyotis | 30 |
| Pu Gong Ying | Dandelion | 30 |
| Yu Xing Cao |
| 30 |
| Jin Yin Hua | Honeysuckle | 9 |
| Chen Pi | Pericarpium citri reticulatae | 9 |
| Xia Ku Cao | Prunella spike | 15 |
| Sheng Mu Li | Concha ostreae | 30 |
baseline characteristics. No significant difference was found in baseline characteristics (gender, age, staging and histology) between the two groups
| Characteristic | Treatment group( | Control group( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex-n(%) | 0.551 | ||
| Male | 80(61.06) | 66(61.11) | |
| Female | 51(38.94) | 42(38.89) | |
| Age | 0.889 | ||
| Median(years) | 60.89(40–78) | 60.56(41–80) | |
| < 65 (%) | 89(54.3) | 75(56) | |
| ≥ 65 (%) | 42(45.7) | 33(44) | |
| Disease stages at entry-n(%) | 0.367 | ||
| IIIa | 2(1.5) | 4(3.7) | |
| IIIb | 35(26.7) | 34(31.5) | |
| IV | 94(71.8) | 70(64.8) | |
| Histology-n(%) | 0.763 | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | 87(66.4) | 74(68.5) | |
| Squamous carcinoma | 29(22.1) | 22(20.4) | |
| Adenosquamous carcinoma | 1(0.8) | 0(0) | |
| Large cell carcinoma and other | 14(10.7) | 12(11.1) | |
Comparison of median survival between the two groups. Log-rank test was used to compare survival between the two groups. If patients receive qi-nourishing essence-replenishing TCM after chemotherapy for more than three months and switch to Gefetinib due to disease progression, survival was calculated as time to the first day of Gefetinib administration plus one month
| Group | Median survival (month) | 95% confident interval (month) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 12.970 ± 0.877 | 11.252–14.688 | 0.027 |
| Experiment | 14.870 ± 1.602 | 11.729–18.011 |
Fig. 1Kaplan-Meier curves for survival and cumulative survival assessment. Control and experimental groups were assessed. Control-censored data, treatment-censored data; length of survival (months)
Comparison of 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 9-year survival rates between the two groups. 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 7-year, and 9-year survival rates were improved in experiment group
| Group (%) | 1-year (%) | 3-year (%) | 5-year (%) | 7-year (%) | 9-year (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 53 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Experiment | 57 | 17 | 10 | 6 | 6 |