Literature DB >> 29618617

Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor.

Sibylle Loibl1, Karsten Weber2, Jens Huober3, Kristin Krappmann4, Frederik Marmé5, Christian Schem6, Knut Engels7, Berit Maria Pfitzner8, Sherko Kümmel9, Jenny Furlanetto2, Arndt Hartmann10, Silvia Darb-Esfahani8, Volkmar Müller11, Annette Staebler12, Gunter von Minckwitz2, Ralf Kronenwett4, Carsten Denkert8,13,14.   

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score.Experimental Design: A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).
Results: A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51; P < 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63; P < 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660; P < 0.001).Conclusions: The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(14); 3358-65. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29618617     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  2 in total

1.  A Phase II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Sunitinib Malate in Combination With Weekly Paclitaxel Followed by Doxorubicin and Daily Oral Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lynn Symonds; Isaac Jenkins; Hannah M Linden; Brenda Kurland; Julie R Gralow; Vijayakrishna V K Gadi; Georgiana K Ellis; Qian Wu; Eve Rodler; Pavani Chalasani; Xiaoyu Chai; Jinny Riedel; Alison Stopeck; Ursa Brown-Glaberman; Jennifer M Specht
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  SABCS 2017 pathology: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath
Journal:  Memo       Date:  2018-08-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.