Literature DB >> 29618583

Reducing Electrolyte Testing in Hospitalized Children by Using Quality Improvement Methods.

Michael J Tchou1,2, Sonya Tang Girdwood3, Benjamin Wormser4, Meifawn Poole4, Stephanie Davis-Rodriguez4, J Timothy Caldwell4, Lauren Shannon3, Philip A Hagedorn3, Eric Biondi5, Jeffrey Simmons3,2, Jeffrey Anderson2,6, Patrick W Brady3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite studies indicating a high rate of overuse, electrolyte testing remains common in pediatric inpatient care. Frequently repeated electrolyte tests often return normal results and can lead to patient harm and increased cost. We aimed to reduce electrolyte testing within a hospital medicine service by >25% within 6 months.
METHODS: We conducted an improvement project in which we targeted 6 hospital medicine teams at a large academic children's hospital system by using the Model for Improvement. Interventions included standardizing communication about the electrolyte testing plan and education about the costs and risks associated with overuse of electrolyte testing. Our primary outcome measure was the number of electrolyte tests per patient day. Secondary measures included testing charges and usage rates of specific high-charge panels. We tracked medical emergency team calls and readmission rates as balancing measures.
RESULTS: The mean baseline rate of electrolyte testing was 2.0 laboratory draws per 10 patient days, and this rate decreased by 35% after 1 month of initial educational interventions to 1.3 electrolyte laboratory draws per 10 patient days. This change has been sustained for 9 months and could save an estimated $292 000 in patient-level charges over the course of a year. Use of our highest-charge electrolyte panel decreased from 67% to 22% of testing. No change in rates of medical emergency team calls or readmission were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Our improvement intervention was associated with significant and rapid reduction in electrolyte testing and has not been associated with unintended adverse events.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29618583      PMCID: PMC7008632          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-3187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   9.703


  51 in total

Review 1.  Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement.

Authors:  J C Benneyan; R C Lloyd; P E Plsek
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Developing a high value care programme from the bottom up: a programme of faculty-resident improvement projects targeting harmful or unnecessary care.

Authors:  Justin M Stinnett-Donnelly; Pamela G Stevens; Virginia L Hood
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Effects of price information on test ordering in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Philippe Seguin; Jean Paul Bleichner; Jacques Grolier; Yves Marie Guillou; Yannick Mallédant
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-02-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The cascade effect in the clinical care of patients.

Authors:  J W Mold; H F Stein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Continued Learning in Supporting Value-Based Decision Making.

Authors:  Eric Hoefgen; Michael Tchou; Patrick Brady
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.960

6.  A qualitative study of sleep quality in children and their resident parents when in hospital.

Authors:  Alice Stickland; Esther Clayton; Ruth Sankey; Catherine M Hill
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Use of a Checklist and Clinical Decision Support Tool Reduces Laboratory Use and Improves Cost.

Authors:  Claudia A Algaze; Matthew Wood; Natalie M Pageler; Paul J Sharek; Christopher A Longhurst; Andrew Y Shin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Serum magnesium levels in pediatric inpatients: a study in laboratory overuse.

Authors:  Sridaran Narayanan; Paul Scalici
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2015-01

9.  Effect of a Price Transparency Intervention in the Electronic Health Record on Clinician Ordering of Inpatient Laboratory Tests: The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mina S Sedrak; Jennifer S Myers; Dylan S Small; Irving Nachamkin; Justin B Ziemba; Dana Murray; Gregory W Kurtzman; Jingsan Zhu; Wenli Wang; Deborah Mincarelli; Daniel Danoski; Brian P Wells; Jeffrey S Berns; Patrick J Brennan; C William Hanson; C Jessica Dine; Mitesh S Patel
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Population-based study of repeat laboratory testing.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Michael Raymond
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patterns of Electrolyte Testing at Children's Hospitals for Common Inpatient Diagnoses.

Authors:  Michael J Tchou; Matt Hall; Samir S Shah; David P Johnson; Alan R Schroeder; James W Antoon; Marquita C Genies; Ricardo Quinonez; Christopher W Miller; Snehal P Shah; Patrick W Brady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 9.703

2.  Learning from Each Other: A Multisite Collaborative to Reduce Electrolyte Testing.

Authors:  Megan Coe; Heidi Gruhler; Matthew Schefft; Dustin Williford; Barrett Burger; Emily Crain; Alexandra J Mihalek; Maria Santos; Jillian M Cotter; Gregory Trowbridge; Jeri Kessenich; Mark Nolan; Michael J Tchou
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-10-26

3.  Deimplementation of Polycythemia Screening in Asymptomatic Infants in a Level 1 Nursery.

Authors:  Scarlett C Johnson; Elizabeth Bigus; Patricia L Thompson; David G Bundy; Michelle I Amaya
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2022-03-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.