Literature DB >> 28430829

Effect of a Price Transparency Intervention in the Electronic Health Record on Clinician Ordering of Inpatient Laboratory Tests: The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mina S Sedrak1, Jennifer S Myers2, Dylan S Small3, Irving Nachamkin4, Justin B Ziemba5, Dana Murray6, Gregory W Kurtzman7, Jingsan Zhu8, Wenli Wang8, Deborah Mincarelli6, Daniel Danoski6, Brian P Wells6, Jeffrey S Berns4, Patrick J Brennan4, C William Hanson4, C Jessica Dine4, Mitesh S Patel9.   

Abstract

Importance: Many health systems are considering increasing price transparency at the time of order entry. However, evidence of its impact on clinician ordering behavior is inconsistent and limited to single-site evaluations of shorter duration. Objective: To test the effect of displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests on clinician ordering behavior over 1 year. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Pragmatic Randomized Introduction of Cost data through the electronic health record (PRICE) trial was a randomized clinical trial comparing a 1-year intervention to a 1-year preintervention period, and adjusting for time trends and patient characteristics. The trial took place at 3 hospitals in Philadelphia between April 2014 and April 2016 and included 98 529 patients comprising 142 921 hospital admissions. Interventions: Inpatient laboratory test groups were randomly assigned to display Medicare allowable fees (30 in intervention) or not (30 in control) in the electronic health record. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was the number of tests ordered per patient-day. Secondary outcomes were tests performed per patient-day and Medicare associated fees.
Results: The sample included 142 921 hospital admissions representing patients who were 51.9% white (74 165), 38.9% black (55 526), and 56.9% female (81 291) with a mean (SD) age of 54.7 (19.0) years. Preintervention trends of order rates among the intervention and control groups were similar. In adjusted analyses of the intervention group compared with the control group over time, there were no significant changes in overall test ordering behavior (0.05 tests ordered per patient-day; 95% CI, -0.002 to 0.09; P = .06) or associated fees ($0.24 per patient-day; 95% CI, -$0.42 to $0.91; P = .47). Exploratory subset analyses found small but significant differences in tests ordered per patient-day based on patient intensive care unit (ICU) stay (patients with ICU stay: -0.16; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.01; P = .04; patients without ICU stay: 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.17; P < .001) and the magnitude of associated fees (top quartile of tests based on fee value: -0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to -0.01; P = .04; bottom quartile: 0.03; 95% CI, 0.002-0.06; P = .04). Adjusted analyses of tests that were performed found a small but significant overall increase in the intervention group relative to the control group over time (0.08 tests performed per patient day, 95% CI, 0.03-0.12; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests did not lead to a significant change in overall clinician ordering behavior or associated fees. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02355496.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28430829      PMCID: PMC5543323          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  21 in total

1.  A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data.

Authors:  R L Williams
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Leveraging insights from behavioral economics to increase the value of health-care service provision.

Authors:  Mitesh S Patel; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Increased price transparency in health care--challenges and potential effects.

Authors:  Anna D Sinaiko; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The effect of charge display on cost of care and physician practice behaviors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Celine Goetz; Stephen R Rotman; George Hartoularos; Tara F Bishop
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A Randomized Trial of Displaying Paid Price Information on Imaging Study and Procedure Ordering Rates.

Authors:  Alyna T Chien; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Laura A Hatfield; Kate E Koplan; Carter R Petty; Anna D Sinaiko; Meredith B Rosenthal; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Provider cost transparency alone has no impact on inpatient imaging utilization.

Authors:  Daniel J Durand; Leonard S Feldman; Jonathan S Lewin; Daniel J Brotman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Hsiao; Esther Hing
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2014-01

8.  Surgical vampires and rising health care expenditure: reducing the cost of daily phlebotomy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuebing; Thomas J Miner
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-05

9.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 10.  Impact of price display on provider ordering: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mark T Silvestri; Tasce R Bongiovanni; Janis G Glover; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.960

View more
  20 in total

1.  Impact of Cost Display on Ordering Patterns for Hospital Laboratory and Imaging Services.

Authors:  Mark T Silvestri; Xiao Xu; Theodore Long; Tasce Bongiovanni; Steven L Bernstein; Sarwat I Chaudhry; Julia I Silvestri; Marilyn Stolar; Erich J Greene; James D Dziura; Cary P Gross; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Effect of Social Comparison Feedback on Laboratory Test Ordering for Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kira Ryskina; C Jessica Dine; Yevgeniy Gitelman; Damien Leri; Mitesh Patel; Gregory Kurtzman; Lisa Y Lin; Andrew J Epstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Application of Unit-Level Cost Transparency, Education, Enhanced Audit, and Feedback of Anonymized Peer Ranking to Promote Judicious Use of 25% Albumin in Critical Care Units.

Authors:  Chiedozie I Udeh; Matthew Wanek; Belinda L Udeh; J Steven Hata
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2019-02-10

4.  Addition of price transparency to an education and feedback intervention reduces utilization of inpatient echocardiography by resident physicians.

Authors:  Patrick M Kozak; Silas P Trumbo; Bradley W Christensen; David L Leverenz; Matthew S Shotwell; Adam J Kingeter
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Effects of Real-time Prescription Benefit Recommendations on Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sunita M Desai; Alan Z Chen; Jiejie Wang; Wei-Yi Chung; Jay Stadelman; Chris Mahoney; Adam Szerencsy; Lisa Anzisi; Ateev Mehrotra; Leora I Horwitz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 44.409

6.  Displaying Cost and Completion Time for Reference Laboratory Test Orders-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shohei Ikoma; Logan Pierce; Douglas S Bell; Eric M Cheng; Thomas Drake; Rong Guo; Alyssa Ziman
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  Nudge Units to Improve the Delivery of Health Care.

Authors:  Mitesh S Patel; Kevin G Volpp; David A Asch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Reducing Blood Loss by Changing to Small Volume Tubes for Laboratory Testing.

Authors:  Yu Wu; Aaron C Spaulding; Shalmali Borkar; Michelle M Shoaei; Maria Mendoza; Rhonda L Grant; Bruce W Barber; Gretchen S Johns; Pablo Moreno Franco
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-11-19

9.  Engagement in Eliminating Overuse: The Argument for Safety and Beyond.

Authors:  Sara Pasik; Deborah Korenstein; Sigal Israilov; Hyung J Cho
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.243

10.  Reducing Electrolyte Testing in Hospitalized Children by Using Quality Improvement Methods.

Authors:  Michael J Tchou; Sonya Tang Girdwood; Benjamin Wormser; Meifawn Poole; Stephanie Davis-Rodriguez; J Timothy Caldwell; Lauren Shannon; Philip A Hagedorn; Eric Biondi; Jeffrey Simmons; Jeffrey Anderson; Patrick W Brady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 9.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.