Literature DB >> 29618163

Differential diagnosis between a granuloma and radicular cyst: effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging.

G Lizio1, E Salizzoni2, M Coe2, M R Gatto1, S Asioli3, T Balbi4, G A Pelliccioni1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic reliability and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate periapical lesions of endodontic origin and to compare the results with histopathological information.
METHODOLOGY: The radiolucent periapical jaw lesions of 34 patients, which were surgically enucleated, were investigated by two radiologists using MRI, based on the same six criteria, to categorize the lesions as granulomas, radicular cysts or others. After apicoectomies, two oral pathologists (blinded to the radiologist's diagnoses) analysed all specimens by referring to seven specific parameters and diagnosed the specimens as granulomas, radicular cysts or other conditions. The inter-rater agreements between the radiologists and pathologists in terms of MRI and histological diagnoses, respectively, along with the discriminant power of the adopted criteria and the accuracy of the MRI assessments compared with the histopathological results, were calculated. Cohen's kappa test was adopted to examine inter-rater agreement between the two radiologists and two pathologists. Guttman's lambda coefficient (λ6 ) was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the items used for the differential diagnosis by radiologists. The accuracy resulted from a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: A strong inter-rater reliability was observed between the two radiologists (k-statistic = 0.86, P = 0.0001) and the two pathologists (k-statistic = 0.88, P = 0.0001). The internal consistency of the diagnostic items was 0.605 for cysts and 0.771 for granulomas. The accuracy (true positives plus true negatives) of the radiologists was greater than that of the pathologists based on analysis (area under the curve = 0.87 and 0.91, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and accuracy of MRI were high and comparable to histopathological reliability, highlighting the usefulness of this noninvasive technique as a pre-treatment diagnostic method for periapical endodontic lesions.
© 2018 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apicoectomy; histology; magnetic resonance imaging; periapical diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29618163     DOI: 10.1111/iej.12933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  5 in total

1.  Endodontic working length measurements of premolars and molars in high-resolution dental MRI: a clinical pilot study for assessment of reliability and accuracy.

Authors:  Mousa Zidan; Franz S Schwindling; Alexander Juerchott; Johannes Mente; Holger Gehrig; Mathias Nittka; Zahra Hosseini; Johann M E Jende; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Tim Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus cone beam computed tomography in diagnosis of periapical pathosis - A systematic review.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar N; Seema Merwade; Pavithra Prabakaran; Laxmi Priya C H; Annapoorna B S; Guruprasad C N
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2021-09-14

3.  Reliability of Ultrasonography in differentially diagnosing periapical lesions of endodontic origin in comparison with Intra-oral periapical radiography and Cone-beam computed tomography: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Snigdho Das; Haridas Das Adhikari
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-03-07

4.  Reliability and accuracy of dental MRI for measuring root canal length of incisors and canines: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Mousa Zidan; Franz S Schwindling; Alexander Juerchott; Johannes Mente; Mathias Nittka; Zahra Hosseini; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Tim Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Christoph Roser; Tim Hilgenfeld; Sinan Sen; Tobias Badrow; Sebastian Zingler; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Christopher J Lux; Alexander Juerchott
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.