Literature DB >> 29617935

Population Density in Hiroshima and Nagasaki Before the Bombings in 1945: Its Measurement and Impact on Radiation Risk Estimates in the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors.

Benjamin French1, Sachiyo Funamoto1, Hiromi Sugiyama2, Ritsu Sakata2, John Cologne1, Harry M Cullings1, Kiyohiko Mabuchi3, Dale L Preston4.   

Abstract

In the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors, differences in urbanicity between high-dose and low-dose survivors could confound the association between radiation dose and adverse outcomes. We obtained data on the population distribution in Hiroshima and Nagasaki before the 1945 bombings and quantified the impact of adjustment for population density on radiation risk estimates for mortality (1950-2003) and incident solid cancer (1958-2009). Population density ranged from 4,671 to 14,378 people/km2 in the urban region of Hiroshima and 5,748 to 19,149 people/km2 in the urban region of Nagasaki. Radiation risk estimates for solid cancer mortality were attenuated by 5.1% after adjustment for population density, but those for all-cause mortality and incident solid cancer were unchanged. There was no overall association between population density and adverse outcomes, but there was evidence that the association between density and mortality differed according to age at exposure. Among survivors who were 10-14 years of age in 1945, there was a positive association between population density and risk of all-cause mortality (per 5,000-people/km2 increase, relative risk = 1.053, 95% confidence interval: 1.027, 1.079) and solid cancer mortality (per 5,000-people/km2 increase, relative risk = 1.069, 95% confidence interval: 1.025, 1.115). Our results suggest that radiation risk estimates from the Life Span Study are not sensitive to unmeasured confounding by urban-rural differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29617935      PMCID: PMC6070048          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  25 in total

1.  Longevity of atomic-bomb survivors.

Authors:  J B Cologne; D L Preston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Childhood socioeconomic circumstances and cause-specific mortality in adulthood: systematic review and interpretation.

Authors:  Bruna Galobardes; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Allowing for random errors in radiation dose estimates for the atomic bomb survivor data.

Authors:  D A Pierce; D O Stram; M Vaeth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  A report from the 2013 international symposium: the evaluation of the effects of low-dose radiation exposure in the life span study of atomic bomb survivors and other similar studies.

Authors:  E J Grant; K Ozasa; N Ban; A Berrington de González; J Cologne; H M Cullings; K Doi; K Furukawa; T Imaoka; K Kodama; N Nakamura; O Niwa; D L Preston; P Rajaraman; A Sadakane; S Saigusa; R Sakata; T Sobue; H Sugiyama; R Ullrich; R Wakeford; S Yasumura; C M Milder; R E Shore
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  DS02R1: Improvements to Atomic Bomb Survivors' Input Data and Implementation of Dosimetry System 2002 (DS02) and Resulting Changes in Estimated Doses.

Authors:  H M Cullings; E J Grant; S D Egbert; T Watanabe; T Oda; F Nakamura; T Yamashita; H Fuchi; S Funamoto; K Marumo; R Sakata; Y Kodama; K Ozasa; K Kodama
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Selection of reference groups in the Life Span Study of atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Benjamin French; John Cologne; Ritsu Sakata; Mai Utada; Dale L Preston
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  The analysis of rates and of survivorship using log-linear models.

Authors:  T R Holford
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Neighbourhoods matter too: the association between neighbourhood socioeconomic position, population density and breast, prostate and lung cancer incidence in Denmark between 2004 and 2008.

Authors:  Mathias Meijer; Kim Bloomfield; Gerda Engholm
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Disentangling contextual effects on cause-specific mortality in a longitudinal 23-year follow-up study: impact of population density or socioeconomic environment?

Authors:  Basile Chaix; Maria Rosvall; John Lynch; Juan Merlo
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer: distinguishing individual- and community-level effects.

Authors:  Stephanie A Robert; Indiana Strombom; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Jane A McElroy; Polly A Newcomb; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  RE: "POPULATION DENSITY IN HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI BEFORE THE BOMBINGS IN 1945: ITS MEASUREMENT AND IMPACT ON RADIATION RISK ESTIMATES IN THE LIFE SPAN STUDY OF ATOMIC BOMB SURVIVORS".

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Radiation Risks of Uterine Cancer in Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1958-2009.

Authors:  Mai Utada; Alina V Brenner; Dale L Preston; John B Cologne; Ritsu Sakata; Hiromi Sugiyama; Atsuko Sadakane; Eric J Grant; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Kotaro Ozasa; Kiyohiko Mabuchi
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-02-08

3.  Incidence of Diabetes in the Atomic Bomb Survivors: 1969-2015.

Authors:  Yoshimi Tatsukawa; Kismet Cordova; Michiko Yamada; Waka Ohishi; Misa Imaizumi; Ayumi Hida; Richard Sposto; Ritsu Sakata; Saeko Fujiwara; Shuhei Nakanishi; Masayasu Yoneda
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.134

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.