Literature DB >> 29617807

Effects of feeding monensin to bred heifers fed in a drylot on nutrient and energy balance.

Courtney N Hemphill1, Tryon A Wickersham1, Jason E Sawyer1, T M Brown-Brandl2, Harvey C Freetly2, Kristin E Hales2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if feeding monensin would improve diet digestion, energy and nitrogen balance in bred heifers receiving a limit-fed corn stalk-based diet. Sixteen pregnant Meat Animal Research Center (MARC) III composite heifers were used in a 161-d completely randomized design. Heifers were randomly assigned to one of two treatments, no monensin (CON) or 150 mg/d monensin (MON), with eight heifers in each treatment group. Heifers were limit-fed a corn stalk-based diet at 100% of MEm requirements. Effects of monensin on energy and nitrogen balance were determined via total fecal and urine collections and open-circuit respiration calorimetry. Total fecal and urine collection occurred on d 14, 42, and 161 of monensin feeding, and calorimetry measurements were made on d 0, 3, 14, 28, 42, and 161 of monensin feeding. DMI was not different (P = 0.94) for CON and MON heifers and, by design, increased (P < 0.01) from d 14 to d 161 of the trial to account for increasing fetal growth requirements. No differences (P = 0.91) in GE intake were observed between CON and MON heifers, and DE and ME intakes did not differ (P > 0.58) with monensin inclusion. DM, OM, NDF, and ADF digestion did not differ (P > 0.52) between treatments. Fecal, methane, urinary, and heat energy losses were not different (P > 0.16) for MON and CON heifers. Methane production was not different between treatments when expressed as daily liters of methane (P = 0.40); however, MON heifers produced 7% less (P = 0.03) methane per day than CON heifers when expressed as liters of methane produced on a metabolic body weight (MBW) basis. Furthermore, monensin had no effect (P = 0.36) on overall retained energy (RE). Nitrogen intake and excretion was not different (P > 0.13) between treatment groups. Results of this experiment indicate that adding monensin to limit-fed, corn stalk-based diets may not have a large effect on the energy and nitrogen balance of confined heifers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29617807      PMCID: PMC6093575          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Effect of monensin fed with forage on digestion and the ruminal ecosystem of steers.

Authors:  D A Donius; M E Simpson; P B Marsh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  J B Russell; H J Strobel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Efficiency of energy and nitrogen loss and gain in mature cows.

Authors:  H C Freetly; J A Nienaber
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Growth, development and composition of the udder and gravid uterus of beef heifers during pregnancy.

Authors:  C L Ferrell; W N Garrett; N Hinman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin in beef cattle on feed efficiency, body weight gain, and dry matter intake.

Authors:  T F Duffield; J K Merrill; R N Bagg
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Efficiency of converting digestible energy to metabolizable energy and reevaluation of the California Net Energy System maintenance requirements and equations for predicting dietary net energy values for beef cattle.

Authors:  M L Galyean; N A Cole; L O Tedeschi; M E Branine
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effect of monensin inclusion on intake, digestion, and ruminal fermentation parameters by Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus steers consuming bermudagrass hay.

Authors:  N L Bell; R C Anderson; T R Callaway; M O Franco; J E Sawyer; T A Wickersham
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Monensin effects on digestibility, methanogenesis and heat increment of a cracked corn-silage diet fed to steers.

Authors:  T C Wedegaertner; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Determining effects of monensin on energy value of corn silage diets for beef cattle by linear or semi-log methods.

Authors:  F M Byers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Monensin supplementation and in vivo methane production by steers.

Authors:  J H Thornton; F N Owens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of diet type on nutrient utilization and energy balance in drylot heifers1.

Authors:  Jessica R Baber; Tryon A Wickersham; Jason E Sawyer; Harvey C Freetly; Tami M Brown-Brandl; Kristin E Hales
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  What is the digestibility and caloric value of different botanical parts in corn residue to cattle?1.

Authors:  Emily A Petzel; Evan C Titgemeyer; Alexander J Smart; Kristin E Hales; Andrew P Foote; Subash Acharya; Eric A Bailey; Jeffrey E Held; Derek W Brake
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Nitroethanol in Comparison with Monensin Exhibits Greater Feed Efficiency Through Inhibiting Rumen Methanogenesis More Efficiently and Persistently in Feedlotting Lambs.

Authors:  Zhen-Wei Zhang; Yan-Lu Wang; Yong-Yan Chen; Wei-Kang Wang; Luo-Tong Zhang; Hai-Ling Luo; Hong-Jian Yang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Predicting metabolizable energy from digestible energy for growing and finishing beef cattle and relationships to the prediction of methane.

Authors:  Kristin E Hales; Carley A Coppin; Zachary K Smith; Zach S McDaniel; Luis O Tedeschi; N Andy Cole; Michael L Galyean
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.