Literature DB >> 29617726

No association between circulating concentrations of vitamin D and risk of lung cancer: an analysis in 20 prospective studies in the Lung Cancer Cohort Consortium (LC3).

D C Muller1, A M Hodge2, A Fanidi3, D Albanes4, X M Mai5, X O Shu6, S J Weinstein4, T L Larose7, X Zhang8, J Han9, M J Stampfer10, S A Smith-Warner11, J Ma8, J M Gaziano12, H D Sesso13, V L Stevens14, M L McCullough14, T M Layne4, R Prentice15, M Pettinger15, C A Thomson16, W Zheng6, Y T Gao17, N Rothman4, Y B Xiang18, H Cai19, R Wang20, J M Yuan21, W P Koh22, L M Butler23, Q Cai19, W J Blot19, J Wu19, P M Ueland24, Ø Midttun25, A Langhammer26, K Hveem27, M Johansson33, J Hultdin29, K Grankvist29, A A Arslan30, L Le Marchand31, G Severi32, M Johansson33, P Brennan34.   

Abstract

Background: There is observational evidence suggesting that high vitamin D concentrations may protect against lung cancer. To investigate this hypothesis in detail, we measured circulating vitamin D concentrations in prediagnostic blood from 20 cohorts participating in the Lung Cancer Cohort Consortium (LC3). Patients and methods: The study included 5313 lung cancer cases and 5313 controls. Blood samples for the cases were collected, on average, 5 years before lung cancer diagnosis. Controls were individually matched to the cases by cohort, sex, age, race/ethnicity, date of blood collection, and smoking status in five categories. Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was used to separately analyze 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 [25(OH)D2] and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D3] and their concentrations were combined to give an overall measure of 25(OH)D. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 25(OH)D as both continuous and categorical variables.
Results: Overall, no apparent association between 25(OH)D and risk of lung cancer was observed (multivariable adjusted OR for a doubling in concentration: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.06). Similarly, we found no clear evidence of interaction by cohort, sex, age, smoking status, or histology.
Conclusion: This study did not support an association between vitamin D concentrations and lung cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29617726      PMCID: PMC6005063          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  6 in total

Review 1.  Vitamin D, cancer, and dysregulated phosphate metabolism.

Authors:  Ronald B Brown
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Prediagnostic Serum Vitamin D, Vitamin D Binding Protein Isoforms, and Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Stephanie J Weinstein; Alison M Mondul; Tracy M Layne; Kai Yu; Jiaqi Huang; Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon; Regina G Ziegler; Mark P Purdue; Wen-Yi Huang; Christian C Abnet; Neal D Freedman; Demetrius Albanes
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2022-03-02

3.  Influence of vitamin D on cancer risk and treatment: Why the variability?

Authors:  M Rita I Young; Ying Xiong
Journal:  Trends Cancer Res       Date:  2018

Review 4.  Vitamins as Possible Cancer Biomarkers: Significance and Limitations.

Authors:  Sascha Venturelli; Christian Leischner; Thomas Helling; Markus Burkard; Luigi Marongiu
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Epidemiology of 40 blood biomarkers of one-carbon metabolism, vitamin status, inflammation, and renal and endothelial function among cancer-free older adults.

Authors:  Hana Zahed; Mattias Johansson; Per M Ueland; Øivind Midttun; Roger L Milne; Graham G Giles; Jonas Manjer; Malte Sandsveden; Arnulf Langhammer; Elin Pettersen Sørgjerd; Kjell Grankvist; Mikael Johansson; Neal D Freedman; Wen-Yi Huang; Chu Chen; Ross Prentice; Victoria L Stevens; Ying Wang; Loic Le Marchand; Lynne R Wilkens; Stephanie J Weinstein; Demetrius Albanes; Qiuyin Cai; William J Blot; Alan A Arslan; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng; Jian-Min Yuan; Woon-Puay Koh; Kala Visvanathan; Howard D Sesso; Xuehong Zhang; J Michael Gaziano; Anouar Fanidi; David Muller; Paul Brennan; Florence Guida; Hilary A Robbins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Development and validation of a model to predict tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitive EGFR mutations of non-small cell lung cancer based on multi-institutional data.

Authors:  Hui Chang; Yuan-Bin Liu; Wei Yi; Jia-Bin Lu; Jie-Xia Zhang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.