BACKGROUND: Higher circulating vitamin D has been associated with improved overall cancer survival, but data for organ-specific cancers are mixed. METHODS: We examined the association between prediagnostic serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], the recognized biomarker of vitamin D status, and cancer survival in 4038 men and women diagnosed with 1 of 11 malignancies during 22 years of follow-up (median = 15.6 years) within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Multivariable-adjusted proportional hazards regression estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between baseline 25(OH)D concentration and subsequent cancer survival; we also stratified on the common vitamin D binding protein isoforms (Gc1f, Gc1s, and Gc2) defined by two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs7041 and rs4588) in the vitamin D binding protein gene GC. All P values were 2-sided. RESULTS: Higher 25(OH)D concentrations were associated with greater overall cancer survival (HR for cancer mortality = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.98 for highest vs lowest quintile; Ptrend = .05) and lung cancer survival (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.90; Ptrend = .03). These associations were limited to cases expressing the Gc2 isoform (HR = 0.38 for Gc2-2, 95% CI = 0.14 to 1.05 for highest vs lowest quintile; Ptrend = .02; and HR = 0.30 for Gc1-2/Gc2-2 combined, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.56; Ptrend < .001 for overall and lung cancer, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Higher circulating 25(OH)D was associated with improved overall and lung cancer survival. As this was especially evident among cases with the genetically determined Gc2 isoform of vitamin D binding protein, such individuals may gain a cancer survival advantage by maintaining higher 25(OH)D blood concentrations. Published by Oxford University Press 2022. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
BACKGROUND: Higher circulating vitamin D has been associated with improved overall cancer survival, but data for organ-specific cancers are mixed. METHODS: We examined the association between prediagnostic serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], the recognized biomarker of vitamin D status, and cancer survival in 4038 men and women diagnosed with 1 of 11 malignancies during 22 years of follow-up (median = 15.6 years) within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Multivariable-adjusted proportional hazards regression estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between baseline 25(OH)D concentration and subsequent cancer survival; we also stratified on the common vitamin D binding protein isoforms (Gc1f, Gc1s, and Gc2) defined by two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs7041 and rs4588) in the vitamin D binding protein gene GC. All P values were 2-sided. RESULTS: Higher 25(OH)D concentrations were associated with greater overall cancer survival (HR for cancer mortality = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.98 for highest vs lowest quintile; Ptrend = .05) and lung cancer survival (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.90; Ptrend = .03). These associations were limited to cases expressing the Gc2 isoform (HR = 0.38 for Gc2-2, 95% CI = 0.14 to 1.05 for highest vs lowest quintile; Ptrend = .02; and HR = 0.30 for Gc1-2/Gc2-2 combined, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.56; Ptrend < .001 for overall and lung cancer, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Higher circulating 25(OH)D was associated with improved overall and lung cancer survival. As this was especially evident among cases with the genetically determined Gc2 isoform of vitamin D binding protein, such individuals may gain a cancer survival advantage by maintaining higher 25(OH)D blood concentrations. Published by Oxford University Press 2022. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: D Michal Freedman; Shih-Chen Chang; Roni T Falk; Mark P Purdue; Wen-Yi Huang; Catherine A McCarty; Bruce W Hollis; Barry I Graubard; Christine D Berg; Regina G Ziegler Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lisa Gallicchio; Lee E Moore; Victoria L Stevens; Jiyoung Ahn; Demetrius Albanes; Virginia Hartmuller; V Wendy Setiawan; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Gong Yang; Yong-Bing Xiang; Xiao-Ou Shu; Kirk Snyder; Stephanie J Weinstein; Kai Yu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Wei Zheng; Qiuyin Cai; David S Campbell; Yu Chen; Wong-Ho Chow; Ronald L Horst; Laurence N Kolonel; Marjorie L McCullough; Mark P Purdue; Karen L Koenig Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon; Richard B Hayes; Ron L Horst; Kristin E Anderson; Bruce W Hollis; Debra T Silverman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jiyoung Ahn; Ulrike Peters; Demetrius Albanes; Mark P Purdue; Christian C Abnet; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Ronald L Horst; Bruce W Hollis; Wen-Yi Huang; James M Shikany; Richard B Hayes Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David Corley Gibbs; Roberd M Bostick; Marjorie L McCullough; Caroline Y Um; W Dana Flanders; Mazda Jenab; Elisabete Weiderpass; Björn Gylling; Inger T Gram; Alicia K Heath; Sandra Colorado-Yohar; Christina C Dahm; Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Aurora Perez-Cornago; Antonia Trichopoulou; Rosario Tumino; Tilman Kühn; Veronika Fedirko Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Lu Yin; José M Ordóñez-Mena; Tianhui Chen; Ben Schöttker; Volker Arndt; Hermann Brenner Journal: Prev Med Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Martin Gaksch; Rolf Jorde; Guri Grimnes; Ragnar Joakimsen; Henrik Schirmer; Tom Wilsgaard; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Inger Njølstad; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Winfried März; Marcus E Kleber; Andreas Tomaschitz; Martin Grübler; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Elias F Gudmundsson; Tamara B Harris; Mary F Cotch; Thor Aspelund; Vilmundur Gudnason; Femke Rutters; Joline W J Beulens; Esther van 't Riet; Giel Nijpels; Jacqueline M Dekker; Diana Grove-Laugesen; Lars Rejnmark; Markus A Busch; Gert B M Mensink; Christa Scheidt-Nave; Michael Thamm; Karin M A Swart; Ingeborg A Brouwer; Paul Lips; Natasja M van Schoor; Christopher T Sempos; Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; Zuzana Škrabáková; Kirsten G Dowling; Kevin D Cashman; Mairead Kiely; Stefan Pilz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 3.240