Verena C Mulder1, Jeroen Bastiaans2,3, Cornelis J M van Leuven4, Jan C van Meurs1,5, Cornelis Kluft4. 1. Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute, Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Immunology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. 4. Good Biomarker Sciences, Leiden, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To measure prothrombin fragments (F1+2) and thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) in vitreous and subretinal fluid (SRF) of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) patients and to validate and further specify our earlier finding of increased thrombin activity in patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). METHODS: F1+2 and TAT were measured in 31 vitreous and 16 SRF samples using the Enzygnost® immunoassays. RESULTS: We found significant levels of F1+2 and TAT in the vitreous of all patients with RRD compared to patients with macular hole or macular pucker. However, there was no significant difference between patients who would develop PVR in the future, had established PVR, and patients with uncomplicated RRD both in vitreous concentrations of F1+2 (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.963) and TAT (p = 0.516). CONCLUSION: The analysis of F1+2 and TAT confirmed significant thrombin generation in both vitreous and SRF of patients with RRD. An imbalance between the thrombin regulation mechanisms TAT and α2-macroglobulin possibly explains the difference from our previous findings.
PURPOSE: To measure prothrombin fragments (F1+2) and thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) in vitreous and subretinal fluid (SRF) of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) patients and to validate and further specify our earlier finding of increased thrombin activity in patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). METHODS:F1+2 and TAT were measured in 31 vitreous and 16 SRF samples using the Enzygnost® immunoassays. RESULTS: We found significant levels of F1+2 and TAT in the vitreous of all patients with RRD compared to patients with macular hole or macular pucker. However, there was no significant difference between patients who would develop PVR in the future, had established PVR, and patients with uncomplicated RRD both in vitreous concentrations of F1+2 (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.963) and TAT (p = 0.516). CONCLUSION: The analysis of F1+2 and TAT confirmed significant thrombin generation in both vitreous and SRF of patients with RRD. An imbalance between the thrombin regulation mechanisms TAT and α2-macroglobulin possibly explains the difference from our previous findings.
Authors: Jeroen Bastiaans; Jan C van Meurs; Conny van Holten-Neelen; Nicole M A Nagtzaam; P Martin van Hagen; Rachel C Chambers; Herbert Hooijkaas; Willem A Dik Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 4.799