PURPOSE: To determine dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid of patients after a peribulbar injection, a subconjunctival injection, or an oral dose of dexamethasone and to compare the results with those of previous similar studies of dexamethasone concentrations in the vitreous. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-eight patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS: Fifty patients received a peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, 49 received a subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, and 49 received an oral dose of 7. 5 mg dexamethasone at various time intervals before surgery. At the time of surgery, a subretinal fluid sample was taken from each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The dexamethasone concentration in the subretinal fluid measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The estimated maximum dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid after the peribulbar injection, the subconjunctival injection, and the oral dose were, respectively, 82.2 ng/ml (standard error, 17. 6), 359 ng/ml (standard error, 80.2), and 12.3 ng/ml (standard error, 1.61). Corrected for dose, the maximum dexamethasone concentrations after subconjunctival injection and peribulbar injection were, respectively, 120 (95% confidence interval, 54/180) and 13 (95% confidence interval, 6.8/20) times greater than after oral administration. CONCLUSIONS: A subconjunctival injection of dexamethasone disodium phosphate is more effective in delivering dexamethasone into the subretinal fluid of patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment compared with peribulbar injection or oral administration. The subretinal dexamethasone concentrations were higher than concentrations measured in the vitreous in previous studies with a similar setup after all three delivery methods.
PURPOSE: To determine dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid of patients after a peribulbar injection, a subconjunctival injection, or an oral dose of dexamethasone and to compare the results with those of previous similar studies of dexamethasone concentrations in the vitreous. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-eight patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS: Fifty patients received a peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, 49 received a subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, and 49 received an oral dose of 7. 5 mg dexamethasone at various time intervals before surgery. At the time of surgery, a subretinal fluid sample was taken from each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The dexamethasone concentration in the subretinal fluid measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The estimated maximum dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid after the peribulbar injection, the subconjunctival injection, and the oral dose were, respectively, 82.2 ng/ml (standard error, 17. 6), 359 ng/ml (standard error, 80.2), and 12.3 ng/ml (standard error, 1.61). Corrected for dose, the maximum dexamethasone concentrations after subconjunctival injection and peribulbar injection were, respectively, 120 (95% confidence interval, 54/180) and 13 (95% confidence interval, 6.8/20) times greater than after oral administration. CONCLUSIONS: A subconjunctival injection of dexamethasone disodium phosphate is more effective in delivering dexamethasone into the subretinal fluid of patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment compared with peribulbar injection or oral administration. The subretinal dexamethasone concentrations were higher than concentrations measured in the vitreous in previous studies with a similar setup after all three delivery methods.
Authors: Pui Shan Chan; Jia Wen Xian; Qingqing Li; Chun Wai Chan; Sharon S Y Leung; Kenneth K W To Journal: AAPS J Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Sai H S Boddu; Jwala Jwala; Ravi Vaishya; Ravinder Earla; Pradeep K Karla; Dhananjay Pal; Ashim K Mitra Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.671
Authors: Ernesto Bali; Eric J Feron; Ed Peperkamp; Marc Veckeneer; Paul G Mulder; Jan C van Meurs Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 3.117