Literature DB >> 29616011

Lipid Bodies as Sites of Prostaglandin E2 Synthesis During Chagas Disease: Impact in the Parasite Escape Mechanism.

Patrícia E de Almeida1, Daniel A M Toledo2, Gabriel S C Rodrigues1, Heloisa D'Avila1.   

Abstract

During Chagas disease, the Trypanosoma cruzi can induce some changes in the host cells in order to escape or manipulate the host immune response. The modulation of the lipid metabolism in the host phagocytes or in the parasite itself is one feature that has been observed. The goal of this mini review is to discuss the mechanisms that regulate intracellular lipid body (LB) biogenesis in the course of this parasite infection and their meaning to the pathophysiology of the disease. The interaction host-parasite induces LB (or lipid droplet) formation in a Toll-like receptor 2-dependent mechanism in macrophages and is enhanced by apoptotic cell uptake. Simultaneously, there is a lipid accumulation in the parasite due to the incorporation of host fatty acids. The increase in the LB accumulation during infection is correlated with an increase in the synthesis of PGE2 within the host cells and the parasite LBs. Moreover, the treatment with fatty acid synthase inhibitor C75 or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as NS-398 and aspirin inhibited the LB biogenesis and also induced the down modulation of the eicosanoid production and the parasite replication. These findings show that LBs are organelles up modulated during the course of infection. Furthermore, the biogenesis of the LB is involved in the lipid mediator generation by both the macrophages and the parasite triggering escape mechanisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chagas disease; T. cruzi; infectious diseases; inflammation; lipid droplets; lipid mediators; parasite replication; prostaglandin

Year:  2018        PMID: 29616011      PMCID: PMC5869919          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Chagas disease represents an infectious condition classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a neglected illness. It is caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi and presents several symptoms, leading to a continuous inflammatory process that results in the replacement of functional health tissues by connective tissue, and thereafter, function loss of tissues and organs, which may lead to death (Teixeira et al., 1978, 2002; Parada et al., 1997; Rodriguez-Salas et al., 1998; Huang et al., 1999; Machado et al., 2008). Studies in T. cruzi experimental infection models have established a strong immunological response in the acute phase, characterized by an intense infiltration of activated macrophages with the ability to process and present antigens, cytokines synthesis, and give co-stimulatory signals demonstrating their essential function in innate immune responses, in order to control the parasite multiplication and elimination (Teixeira et al., 2002). A distinguishing aspect of Chagas disease-triggered macrophages is the increased numbers of distinct cytoplasmic organelles called lipid bodies (LBs) (Figure ) (Melo et al., 2003; D’Avila et al., 2011). Lipid bodies (LBs) biogenesis and components in both the host cell cytoplasm during the interaction and/or infection with T. cruzi and in the trypomastigotes forms of T. cruzi. (A) LBs accumulation (green) in murine infected macrophage after staining with BODIPY® 493/503. Nuclei of macrophage and internalized parasites were stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; blue). (B) Schematic representation of the structural composition of a LB. Colored objects represent LBs surface-bound proteins located in the phospholipid monolayer. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE) 2, arachidonic acid (AA), diacilclycerols (DAG), triacylglycerols (TAG), and cholesterol esters (CE) are found in the neutral lipid core. (C) Electron micrograph showing a LB in the trypomastigote form of T. cruzi. From: Melo, RCN (courtesy); Toledo, DAM and D’Avila, H. Lipid bodies are lipid rich-organelles that have been found in almost all organisms from bacteria to humans (Alvarez et al., 1996; Waltermann et al., 2005; Murphy, 2012). In mammalians, LBs are found in the major part of leukocytes and other cellular types, such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and mastocytes (Dvorak et al., 1993; Bozza et al., 2007) and can be involved directly or indirectly in numerous cellular functions, such as lipid metabolism, membrane traffic, intracellular signaling and the production of several inflammatory mediators (Bozza et al., 2007). LBs within infected cells are involved in the production of inflammatory mediators which can potentially inhibit the host Th1 response, thus, modulating parasite growth (Snijdewint et al., 1993; Kalinski, 2012). Interestingly, a recent study established that T. cruzi LBs are also active and producing immunosuppressive inflammatory mediators which may represent not only an evasion strategy but also a survival factor exhibited by the parasite (Toledo et al., 2016). The purpose of this mini review is to present the recent progress in elucidating the structure, formation mechanisms and functions of intracellular LBs within both infected host cells and the protozoan parasite T. cruzi, as well as their impact on the host response and parasite escape mechanism during Chagas disease.

Lipid Body Characterization and Structure

Lipid bodies, also known as lipid droplets or adiposomes, are multi-functional organelles associated with lipid homeostasis in virtually all cells (Figure ). Although, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of LBs biogenesis remain to be determined; it is currently known that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) structure may have an important role during LB biogenesis. In eukaryotic cells, LBs are formed de novo from the ER (Jacquier et al., 2011; Kassan et al., 2013; Choudhary et al., 2015). The most accepted model suggests that it was as a building model, where enzymes, such as diacyltransferase DGAT1 and DGAT2, produce triacylglycerols (TAG). Moreover, these enzymes are involved in lipid metabolism localized in specific compartments of the ER, favoring the synthesis of neutral lipid between the two membrane leaflets of the ER, producing a hydrophobic neutral lipid core (Murphy and Vance, 1999; Bozza et al., 2009; Walther et al., 2017). After reaching a determined size, nascent LBs carried with proteins lacking trans-membrane spanning domains bud off from ER into the cytoplasm and finally the lipids are coated by a phospholipid monolayer from the cytoplasmic leaflet of the ER membrane (Murphy, 1999, 2001; Martin and Parton, 2005; Bozza et al., 2009; Walther et al., 2017). In general, the LB structure consists of a neutral lipid core, containing TAG and cholesterol ester (CE) in its majority, surrounded by an outer monolayer of phospholipids because LBs besides being heterogeneous organelles also lack a true delimiting unit membrane structure (Tauchi-Sato et al., 2002). Moreover, LBs are structured by perilipin (PLIN) family proteins, including perilipin/PLIN1, PLIN2/ADRP (adipose differentiation-related protein), PLIN3/TIP47 (tail-interacting protein of 47 KDa) (Figure ) (Brasaemle et al., 1997; Wolins et al., 2006; Dalen et al., 2007; Welte, 2007). The protein content can be diverse once proteomic studies have shown ribosomal, mitochondrial, and vesicular transport proteins, such as Ras-associated binding protein (RAB)s, ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)s, caveolins and ER components compartmentalized in the LBs, suggesting their role in fusion and fission with other LBs or organelles, as well as cell signaling and inflammatory mediator proteins under different conditions. However, the lipid and protein content depend on the cell type and condition of the cellular activation (Dvorak et al., 1993; Bozza et al., 1997; Yu et al., 1998, 2000; Wu et al., 2000; Fujimoto et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2002; Umlauf et al., 2004; Ozeki et al., 2005; Bartz et al., 2007; Bostrom et al., 2007; Hodges and Wu, 2010).

Lipid Body Formation During T. cruzi Infection

The mechanism of formation of LBs in host cells is a highly regulated event. Upon leukocytes activation LBs are formed rapidly in response to different stimuli and pathological conditions, such as infection by distinct pathogens: mycobacteria (Cardona and Ausina, 2000; D’Avila et al., 2006; Almeida et al., 2009, 2014; Mattos et al., 2010, 2011), virus (Ferguson et al., 2017) or protozoan, such as T. cruzi (Melo et al., 2003; D’Avila et al., 2011), Leishmania major (Rabhi et al., 2016), L. amazonensis (Pinheiro et al., 2009; Lecoeur et al., 2013), and Toxoplasma gondii (Gomes et al., 2014; Mota et al., 2014). During in vivo studies in T. cruzi infection, it was demonstrated that this disease promotes an important inflammatory response featured by intense macrophage migration to the infectious sites, mainly the heart (Melo and Machado, 2001; Melo et al., 2003). Melo et al. (2006) showed LBs enhancement in inflammatory macrophages associated with increased myocardial parasitism (Melo et al., 2006). Moreover, during T. cruzi infection, LBs show a diversity electron-density, which suggest a diverse composition associated with recruitment and/or in situ production of lipid inflammatory mediators (Melo et al., 2003, 2006). In macrophages, the T. cruzi internalization potentiates LB biogenesis; however, the phagocytosis is neither sufficient nor essential for triggering the biogenesis. It has been demonstrated that after a 24 h period of infection with T. cruzi, peritoneal macrophages with internalized parasites, as well as non-parasitized cells show increased number of LBs compared to control (D’Avila et al., 2011). Although not fully elucidated, the formation of LBs in host macrophages seems to involve the pathogen recognition by surface receptors, as well as paracrine signaling that soluble factors secreted by parasites or infected cells might induce LB biogenesis in non-parasitized cells. Our group demonstrated that, in murine macrophages, the in vitro T. cruzi infection induced LBs formation through recognition via toll like receptor 2 (TLR-2) (Figure ) (D’Avila et al., 2011). In fact, some groups of researchers have identified different molecular motifs from this parasite able of activating TLRs in macrophages, such as Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored mucin-like glycoproteins (tGPI-mucin) present in the parasite membrane and capable of inducing the inflammatory response through an activation of TLR2 (Almeida et al., 1999; Campos et al., 2001; Gravina et al., 2013). However, the identification of downstream signaling pathways involved in this processes during T. cruzi infection needs to be more elucidated. TLR4 has also been involved in the immune response during the first stage of infection (Rodrigues et al., 2012); nonetheless, it was not able to mediate the LB formation in macrophages (D’Avila et al., 2011). Lipid bodies formation in response to interaction macrophage- T. cruzi favors parasite replication. The uptake of trypomastigotes through TLR2 induces LBs formation in macrophages, which is potentiated by phagocytosis of apoptotic cells through αvβ3 receptor. The interaction of parasite–macrophage also induces LBs accumulation in extracellular trypomastigotes and intracellular amastigotes, which can serve as lipid sources for parasite growth. In addition, the TGF-β produced by infected macrophages acts autocrinally contributing for LBs increase. New formed LBs from parasite and macrophage are sites for PGE2 synthesis, because they compartmentalize the substrate (AA) and the enzymes as (COX-2 and PGE2 synthase) for their production. PGE2 is a potent lipid mediator that, together with TGF- β, potentially reduces the host Th1 immune response, thus decreasing the microbicidal capacity of the macrophage. The macrophages treatment with Aspirin, NS-398 or C75 can inhibit LBs accumulation and LBs-derived PGE2 synthesis, controlling the parasite replication. AA, arachidonic acid; COX-2, cyclooxygenase -2, TGF-βR, TGF- βR receptor. During T. cruzi infection, the induction of apoptosis, especially of T and B lymphocytes (Freire-de-Lima et al., 2000; DosReis, 2011) and neutrophils (Magalhaes et al., 2017) represents an important mechanism that contributes to the parasite replication, due to the immunomodulatory effects on the host immune response (Decote-Ricardo et al., 2017). Consequently, the efferocytosis or phagocytic clearance of these apoptotic cells by macrophages has profound consequences on innate and adaptive immune responses in inflamed tissues (Elliott et al., 2017). Moreover, it has been shown that the formation of LBs during T. cruzi infection in macrophages is potentiated in the presence of apoptotic, but not necrotic or living cells (D’Avila et al., 2011). The uptake of apoptotic cells through the αvβ3 integrin (vitronectin receptor) is critical in the induction of LBs during T. cruzi infection (Figure ). In addition, the treatment with flavoridin, a desintegrin that blocks binding via avβ3, completely abolished the LB-formation induced by the apoptotic cells uptake (D’Avila et al., 2011). Furthermore, some groups have shown that the interaction of apoptotic cells and phagocytic cells induces the production of cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β (Voll et al., 1997; Xiao et al., 2006, 2008) causing these cells to be more permissive to T. cruzi infection (Freire-de-Lima et al., 2000; D’Avila et al., 2011). Studies in vitro have shown that the TGF- β produced by macrophages could induce LBs in these cells. The use anti-TGF β1 neutralizing antibody inhibited the secretion of TGF- β, and abolished the LB formation induced by this cytokine, demonstrating that this mediator can directly trigger LB formation (Figure ) (D’Avila et al., 2011). Even though the attachment of other co-receptors cannot be ruled out, these data suggest that efferocytosis by macrophages through αvβ3 receptor triggers TGF-β1-dependent potentiating the LB biogenesis.

Lipid Body Formation in the Protozoan T. cruzi

In recent years, it has become of interest the study of the biogenesis, structure, composition, and function of LBs formed within protists parasites, such as T. cruzi. These parasites are able to acquire host lipids or to codify their own lipid biosynthesis machinery, thus allowing LBs biogenesis independently of their host (D’Avila et al., 2012; Herker and Ott, 2012). Toledo et al. (2016) showed that metacyclic trypomastigote forms from T. cruzi, co-cultured with peritoneal macrophages for 1 h had enhanced LB biogenesis, suggesting that the interaction of infective forms of parasite with inflammatory host leukocytes such as macrophages might quickly modulate the LB formation in the T. cruzi (Figure ). Moreover, ultrastructural analyses of LBs from amastigote forms inside macrophages, showed the presence of a typical monolayer of phospholipids with varied electron-density, similar for the one of the mammals cells. In addition, the electron density was dependent on the cell activation state and the LBs from the amastigotes inside heart macrophages, during in vivo infection, were more electron-dense, than the LBs from peritoneal macrophages, during in vitro infection (Toledo et al., 2016). Furthermore, it has been showed that the arachidonic acid (AA) is a potent inductor of LB formation in eukaryotic cells (Weller et al., 1991b; Bozza et al., 1996) and that these organelles incorporate AA, mostly esterified in phospholipids (Weller and Dvorak, 1985; Weller et al., 1991a). Interestingly, trypomastigotes forms of T. cruzi stimulated by AA in vitro presented an enhanced number of LBs when compared to unstimulated parasites in a time- and dose-dependent manner, with a peak at 24 h of in vitro stimulation. Raman spectroscopy and MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy confirmed that both parasites stimulated by AA can incorporate a higher content of unsaturated fatty acids, such as AA inside parasite LBs (Toledo et al., 2016). These organelles, formed as the outcome of host interaction, suggest that the high content of AA can be captured from host cell by the parasite (Figure ).

Lipid Bodies Are Specialized in the Eicosanoids Synthesis in Both Parasite and Host Cells

As described before, LBs can accumulate AA, suggesting that these LBs are potentially efficient to initiate intracellular signaling pathways that culminate in the formation of lipid inflammatory mediators, such as eicosanoids (Weller and Dvorak, 1985; Weller et al., 1991a). Prostaglandins (PG) are eicosanoids derived from AA, which are converted by cyclooxygenase (COX-1 and COX-2) into PGH2, which in turn is converted in vivo and in vitro into various arachidonate metabolites, such as PGD2, PGE2, and PGF2a (Hayaishi and Urade, 2002; Miller, 2006). The PGE2 sustains homeostatic functions and mediates pathogenic mechanisms, including the inflammatory response associated with parasitic disease (Kubata et al., 2007). In fact, previous works documented LBs as sites of compartmentalization of eicosanoid-forming enzymes (Yu et al., 1998; Bozza et al., 2002; D’Avila et al., 2006, 2011), and in situ production of eicosanoids, such as leukotrienes and prostaglandins, were really identified in these organelles within activated cells during an inflammatory situation (Bandeira-Melo et al., 2001; Pacheco et al., 2002; Vieira-de-Abreu et al., 2005; D’Avila et al., 2006). Earlier works have demonstrated that macrophages infected by T. cruzi were positively immunostained for COX-2, and COX-2 expression was increased when macrophages were co-cultured with apoptotic cells (Freire-de-Lima et al., 2000; D’Avila et al., 2011). In addition, D’Avila et al. (2011) confirmed that COX-2 is localized within LBs as well as in the perinuclear membrane in infected cells. Using Eicosacell technique, a strategy developed for direct in situ immunolocalization of eicosanoid synthesis (Bandeira-Melo et al., 2011), new formed PGE2 was produced in LBs induced by T. cruzi infection in the presence of apoptotic cells (D’Avila et al., 2011). After the findings on the synthesis of PGE2 in LB-induced by T. cruzi in macrophages, it was showed that LBs from trypomatigotes forms of T. cruzi, are capable to incorporate AA and might be sources of PGE2 synthesis, suggesting an activation of the AA cascade and a likely pathway for PGE2 production in the parasite (Toledo et al., 2016). Moreover, the parasites produce PGs, like eukaryotic cells possessing the enzymatic machineries for PG biosynthesis (Daugschies and Joachim, 2000; Kubata et al., 2002; Noverr et al., 2003). However, the homologs of mammalian COX have not been found in any parasitic protozoan so far, although proteins called COX-like enzymes, that are similar to the mammalian COX-1 and COX-2 have already been identified (Kubata et al., 2002). Indeed, trypomastigotes forms of T. cruzi, stimulated by AA led to quantitative increases in LBs biogenesis in parallel with PGE2 secretion and PGE2 synthase expression (Toledo et al., 2016). Thus, the co-localization of LB and PGE2 sites within stimulated trypomastigotes, give credence to the LBs as organelles to the sites for newly formed PGE2 during the activation (Toledo et al., 2016). This is also true for the T. cruzi infection in macrophages (D’Avila et al., 2011). These data suggest that LBs may be the source of lipid and inflammatory mediators, in response to the host–parasite interaction. Furthermore, PGE2 may be a powerful immunomodulator and acts in the immunosuppression that occurs during T. cruzi infection, indicating a function for PGs from T. cruzi in the Chagas disease pathogenesis.

Lipid Body Inhibition as Infection Control Strategy

Based on the effects that T. cruzi infection and apoptotic cell uptake cause on LBs formation in the host cell, it has been investigated whether modulation of the formation of this organelle could impact the replication of the parasite (D’Avila et al., 2011). It was tested the effect of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aspirin (COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor) and NS- 398 (COX-2 inhibitor) which, in addition to their COX inhibitory effect, also inhibit COX-independent LB formation (Bozza et al., 1996, 2002). Both aspirin and NS-398 inhibited the LB biogenesis in infected macrophages in the presence or absence of apoptotic cells, suppressing the T. cruzi effects on LB-derived PGE2 synthesis, and reversing the enhancement on parasite replication induced by apoptotic cells (Figure ). Therefore, the biogenesis of the LBs in both the T. cruzi infection and in the parasite interaction has a direct role in the ability of the macrophages to synthesize increased amounts of PGE2, which may have an impact on the course of the disease (D’Avila et al., 2011). In parallel, LB biogenesis seems to request de novo lipid synthesis in a cellular mechanism controlled by fatty acid synthase (Schmid et al., 2005; D’Avila et al., 2006; Accioly et al., 2008). Therefore, the fatty acid synthase inhibitor C75 significantly inhibited LB biogenesis induced by T. cruzi infection, with or without the uptake of apoptotic cells, through a mechanism independent of the inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme (Figure ). Remarkably, it was demonstrated that the treatment with C75 also reversed the parasite replication in macrophages as well as the formation of LBs (D’Avila et al., 2011). In conclusion, it is safe to say that these organelles show an important role in the inflammatory response, especially against intracellular pathogens, since their biogenesis leads to the production of inflammatory mediators, suppressing the macrophage effectiveness to respond and reduce its capacity to eliminate the parasite and control the infection. In this mini review, we analyzed the structure, composition and function of the LBs in the parasite and host cell during T. cruzi infection (Melo et al., 2003; D’Avila et al., 2011). The increases in LB numbers in T. cruzi, associated with changes in LB ultrastructure highlight the fact that LBs parasites are also plastic, dynamic and active organelles, which are efficient in modifying their structure and composition in line with immune cell activation mechanisms.

Concluding Remarks

Studies have investigated the intriguing formation of LBs, both in the host cell and in the parasite itself (D’Avila et al., 2011; Toledo et al., 2016). Newly formed host LBs are distinguished for their efficiency to synthesize lipid inflammatory mediators, such as PGE2 and to compartmentalize eicosanoid-forming enzymes, such as COX-2 (Yu et al., 1998; Bozza et al., 2002; D’Avila et al., 2006, 2011). Host leukocytes LBs triggered by T. cruzi infection and increased by the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells are accepted not only as inflammatory organelles and structural markers of parasite-induced cell activation, but also as organelles efficient in the orchestration of the host cell metabolism (D’Avila et al., 2011). A recent work supports the idea that the T. cruzi itself is capable of producing LB-derived PGE2 after contact with the host cell to facilitate its own survival (Toledo et al., 2016). This is evidence that parasites have adapted to their lipid hosts modulation mechanisms by taking advantage of the cellular metabolism favoring the diseases progression. However, the effects of modulating the formation of LBs by distinct drugs and their influence in the control of parasite replication experimentally, suggest mechanisms that could help in the discovery of new effective therapies for Chagas disease.

Author Contributions

PA and HD drafted and edited the manuscript. DMT edited the figures. PA, DMT, GR, and HD wrote and approved the final version of the paper.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  86 in total

Review 1.  Trypanosoma cruzi mucins: potential functions of a complex structure.

Authors:  I C Almeida; R Gazzinelli; M A Ferguson; L R Travassos
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.743

2.  Extranuclear lipid bodies, elicited by CCR3-mediated signaling pathways, are the sites of chemokine-enhanced leukotriene C4 production in eosinophils and basophils.

Authors:  C Bandeira-Melo; M Phoofolo; P F Weller
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-03-26       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Leukocyte lipid bodies regulation and function: contribution to allergy and host defense.

Authors:  Patricia T Bozza; Rossana C N Melo; Christianne Bandeira-Melo
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Lipid droplets are functionally connected to the endoplasmic reticulum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Nicolas Jacquier; Vineet Choudhary; Muriel Mari; Alexandre Toulmay; Fulvio Reggiori; Roger Schneiter
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Host cell lipid bodies triggered by Trypanosoma cruzi infection and enhanced by the uptake of apoptotic cells are associated with prostaglandin E₂ generation and increased parasite growth.

Authors:  Heloisa D'Avila; Célio G Freire-de-Lima; Natalia R Roque; Livia Teixeira; Christina Barja-Fidalgo; Adriana R Silva; Rossana C N Melo; George A Dosreis; Hugo C Castro-Faria-Neto; Patrícia T Bozza
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  LSDP5 is a PAT protein specifically expressed in fatty acid oxidizing tissues.

Authors:  Knut Tomas Dalen; Tuva Dahl; Elin Holter; Borghild Arntsen; Constantine Londos; Carole Sztalryd; Hilde I Nebb
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-12-08

7.  Arachidonic acid incorporation by cytoplasmic lipid bodies of human eosinophils.

Authors:  P F Weller; A M Dvorak
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Dynamic activity of lipid droplets: protein phosphorylation and GTP-mediated protein translocation.

Authors:  René Bartz; John K Zehmer; Meifang Zhu; Yue Chen; Ginette Serrero; Yingming Zhao; Pingsheng Liu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 9.  Lipid Droplet Biogenesis.

Authors:  Tobias C Walther; Jeeyun Chung; Robert V Farese
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 13.827

10.  Cytoplasmic lipid bodies of neutrophils: formation induced by cis-unsaturated fatty acids and mediated by protein kinase C.

Authors:  P F Weller; S W Ryeom; S T Picard; S J Ackerman; A M Dvorak
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Lipid Droplet, a Key Player in Host-Parasite Interactions.

Authors:  Adriana Lima Vallochi; Livia Teixeira; Karina da Silva Oliveira; Clarissa Menezes Maya-Monteiro; Patricia T Bozza
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 2.  Metabolic programming of macrophage functions and pathogens control.

Authors:  Sue-Jie Koo; Nisha J Garg
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 11.799

3.  Eosinophils and Neutrophils-Molecular Differences Revealed by Spontaneous Raman, CARS and Fluorescence Microscopy.

Authors:  Aleksandra Dorosz; Marek Grosicki; Jakub Dybas; Ewelina Matuszyk; Marko Rodewald; Tobias Meyer; Jürgen Popp; Kamilla Malek; Malgorzata Baranska
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Roles of three putative salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) prostaglandin E2 synthases in physiology and host-parasite interactions.

Authors:  Sussie Dalvin; Christiane Eichner; Michael Dondrup; Aina-Cathrine Øvergård
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 5.  Biogenesis and Breakdown of Lipid Droplets in Pathological Conditions.

Authors:  Claudio M Fader Kaiser; Patricia S Romano; M Cristina Vanrell; Cristian A Pocognoni; Julieta Jacob; Benjamín Caruso; Laura R Delgui
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-07

6.  Lipid droplets of protozoan parasites: survival and pathogenicity.

Authors:  Victor de Souza Tavares; Monara Viera de Castro; Rayane da Silva Oliveira Souza; Iana Kátia Araújo Gonçalves; Jonilson Berlink Lima; Valéria de Matos Borges; Théo Araújo-Santos
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.743

7.  Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 modulates Toxoplasma gondii infection, immune response and lipid droplets formation in human trophoblast cells and villous explants.

Authors:  Guilherme de Souza; Rafaela José Silva; Iliana Claudia Balga Milián; Alessandra Monteiro Rosini; Thádia Evelyn de Araújo; Samuel Cota Teixeira; Mário Cézar Oliveira; Priscila Silva Franco; Claudio Vieira da Silva; José Roberto Mineo; Neide Maria Silva; Eloisa Amália Vieira Ferro; Bellisa Freitas Barbosa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Lipid hijacking: a unifying theme in vector-borne diseases.

Authors:  Anya J O'Neal; L Rainer Butler; Agustin Rolandelli; Stacey D Gilk; Joao Hf Pedra
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.