Literature DB >> 29615433

Mutation Profiling of Key Cancer Genes in Primary Breast Cancers and Their Distant Metastases.

Willemijne A M E Schrijver1, Pier Selenica2, Ju Youn Lee2, Charlotte K Y Ng2, Kathleen A Burke2, Salvatore Piscuoglio2, Samuel H Berman2, Jorge S Reis-Filho2, Britta Weigelt3, Paul J van Diest4, Cathy B Moelans1.   

Abstract

Although the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations of primary breast cancers has been extensively catalogued, the genetic differences between primary and metastatic tumors have been less studied. In this study, we compared somatic mutations and gene copy number alterations of primary breast cancers and their matched metastases from patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease. DNA samples obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded ER-negative/HER2-positive (n = 9) and ER-, progesterone receptor (PR-), HER2-negative (n = 8) primary breast cancers and from paired brain or skin metastases and normal tissue were subjected to a hybridization capture-based massively parallel sequencing assay, targeting 341 key cancer genes. A large subset of nonsynonymous somatic mutations (45%) and gene copy number alterations (55%) was shared between the primary tumors and paired metastases. However, mutations restricted to either a given primary tumor or its metastasis, the acquisition of loss of heterozygosity of the wild-type allele, and clonal shifts of genes affected by somatic mutations, such as TP53 and RB1, were observed in the progression from primary tumors to metastases. No metastasis location-specific alterations were identified, but synchronous metastases showed higher concordance with the paired primary tumor than metachronous metastases. Novel potentially targetable alterations were found in the metastases relative to their matched primary tumors. These data indicate that repertoires of somatic genetic alterations in ER-negative metastatic breast cancers may differ from those of their primary tumors, even by the presence of driver and targetable somatic genetic alterations.Significance: Somatic genetic alterations in ER-negative breast cancer metastases may be distinct from those of their primary tumors, suggesting that for treatment-decision making, genetic analyses of DNA obtained from the metastatic lesion rather than from the primary tumor should be considered. Cancer Res; 78(12); 3112-21. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29615433      PMCID: PMC6355142          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  49 in total

1.  American society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Antonio C Wolff; Pamela B Mangu; Sarah Temin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  No consent should be needed for using leftover body material for scientific purposes. For.

Authors:  Paul J van Diest
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-09-21

3.  Benchmarking mutation effect prediction algorithms using functionally validated cancer-related missense mutations.

Authors:  Luciano G Martelotto; Charlotte Ky Ng; Maria R De Filippo; Yan Zhang; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Raymond S Lim; Ronglai Shen; Larry Norton; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index.

Authors:  John S Meyer; Consuelo Alvarez; Clara Milikowski; Neal Olson; Irma Russo; Jose Russo; Andrew Glass; Barbara A Zehnbauer; Karen Lister; Reza Parwaresch
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Trends in survival over the past two decades among white and black patients with newly diagnosed stage IV breast cancer.

Authors:  Shaheenah Dawood; Kristine Broglio; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs.

Authors:  Christopher T Saunders; Wendy S W Wong; Sajani Swamy; Jennifer Becq; Lisa J Murray; R Keira Cheetham
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases.

Authors:  Laurien D C Hoefnagel; Marc J van de Vijver; Henk-Jan van Slooten; Pieter Wesseling; Jelle Wesseling; Pieter J Westenend; Joost Bart; Cornelis A Seldenrijk; Iris D Nagtegaal; Joost Oudejans; Paul van der Valk; Petra van der Groep; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  A core MYC gene expression signature is prominent in basal-like breast cancer but only partially overlaps the core serum response.

Authors:  Sanjay Chandriani; Eirik Frengen; Victoria H Cowling; Sarah A Pendergrass; Charles M Perou; Michael L Whitfield; Michael D Cole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mutational signatures of ionizing radiation in second malignancies.

Authors:  Sam Behjati; Gunes Gundem; David C Wedge; Nicola D Roberts; Patrick S Tarpey; Susanna L Cooke; Peter Van Loo; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Manasa Ramakrishna; Helen Davies; Serena Nik-Zainal; Claire Hardy; Calli Latimer; Keiran M Raine; Lucy Stebbings; Andy Menzies; David Jones; Rebecca Shepherd; Adam P Butler; Jon W Teague; Mette Jorgensen; Bhavisha Khatri; Nischalan Pillay; Adam Shlien; P Andrew Futreal; Christophe Badie; Ultan McDermott; G Steven Bova; Andrea L Richardson; Adrienne M Flanagan; Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Multifocal clonal evolution characterized using circulating tumour DNA in a case of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Muhammed Murtaza; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Katherine Pogrebniak; Oscar M Rueda; Elena Provenzano; John Grant; Suet-Feung Chin; Dana W Y Tsui; Francesco Marass; Davina Gale; H Raza Ali; Pankti Shah; Tania Contente-Cuomo; Hossein Farahani; Karey Shumansky; Zoya Kingsbury; Sean Humphray; David Bentley; Sohrab P Shah; Matthew Wallis; Nitzan Rosenfeld; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  21 in total

1.  Genomic characterization of metastatic breast cancers.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Charlotte K Y Ng; Anne Patsouris; Thomas Filleron; Christophe Le Tourneau; Fabrice André; Nathalie Droin; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Nadine Carbuccia; Jean Charles Soria; Alicia Tran Dien; Yahia Adnani; Maud Kamal; Séverine Garnier; Guillaume Meurice; Marta Jimenez; Semih Dogan; Benjamin Verret; Max Chaffanet; Thomas Bachelot; Mario Campone; Claudia Lefeuvre; Herve Bonnefoi; Florence Dalenc; Alexandra Jacquet; Maria R De Filippo; Naveen Babbar; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Comprehensive genomic analysis contrasting primary colorectal cancer and matched liver metastases.

Authors:  Akio Shiomi; Masatoshi Kusuhara; Takashi Sugino; Teiichi Sugiura; Keiichi Ohshima; Takeshi Nagashima; Kenichi Urakami; Masakuni Serizawa; Hideyuki Saya; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  Breast Cancer: A Molecularly Heterogenous Disease Needing Subtype-Specific Treatments.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-23

4.  The genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer highlights changes in mutation and signature frequencies.

Authors:  Lindsay Angus; Marcel Smid; Saskia M Wilting; Job van Riet; Arne Van Hoeck; Luan Nguyen; Serena Nik-Zainal; Tessa G Steenbruggen; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Mariette Labots; Johanna M G H van Riel; Haiko J Bloemendal; Neeltje Steeghs; Martijn P Lolkema; Emile E Voest; Harmen J G van de Werken; Agnes Jager; Edwin Cuppen; Stefan Sleijfer; John W M Martens
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Histone deacetylase 6 expression in metastatic lymph nodes is a valuable prognostic marker for resected node-positive esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Xuan Xie; Kongjia Luo; Yi Li; Yihong Ling; Shuishen Zhang; Xiuying Xie; Jing Wen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Differential gene expression and AKT targeting in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Feng-Mao Lin; Susan E Yost; Wei Wen; Paul H Frankel; Daniel Schmolze; Pei-Guo Chu; Yate-Ching Yuan; Zheng Liu; John Yim; Zhen Chen; Yuan Yuan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-07-09

7.  Genomic profiling of primary and recurrent adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary.

Authors:  Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Edaise M da Silva; Sheila E Segura; Fresia Pareja; Rui Bi; Pier Selenica; Sarah H Kim; Lorenzo Ferrando; Mahsa Vahdatinia; Robert A Soslow; August Vidal; Sonia Gatius; Christopher G Przybycin; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Brian P Rubin; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Deborah F DeLair; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Specific chromatin landscapes and transcription factors couple breast cancer subtype with metastatic relapse to lung or brain.

Authors:  Wesley L Cai; Celeste B Greer; Jocelyn F Chen; Anna Arnal-Estapé; Jian Cao; Qin Yan; Don X Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Real-time ex vivo perfusion of human lymph nodes invaded by cancer (REPLICANT): a feasibility study.

Authors:  Rachel Barrow-McGee; Julia Procter; Julie Owen; Natalie Woodman; Cristina Lombardelli; Ashutosh Kothari; Tibor Kovacs; Michael Douek; Simi George; Peter A Barry; Kelvin Ramsey; Amy Gibson; Richard Buus; Erle Holgersen; Rachael Natrajan; Syed Haider; Michael J Shattock; Cheryl Gillett; Andrew Nj Tutt; Sarah E Pinder; Kalnisha Naidoo
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2019-12-22       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 10.  How to Make Anticancer Drugs Cross the Blood-Brain Barrier to Treat Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Eurydice Angeli; Thuy T Nguyen; Anne Janin; Guilhem Bousquet
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.