| Literature DB >> 29615100 |
Yunus Oc1, Bekir Eray Kilinc2, Anıl Gulcu3, Ali Varol4, Rodi Ertugrul5, Adnan Kara6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Complications related to extensor tendons have begun to increase with the use of volar plates in the treatment of distal radius fractures. In this study, we aimed to compare four-plane radiography and ultrasonography in the evaluation of dorsal cortex screw penetration following volar plate fixation.Entities:
Keywords: Distal radius; Dorsal cortex penetration; Screw penetration; Ultrasonic evaluation; Volar plating
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29615100 PMCID: PMC5883576 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0774-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Patient number 8. Left wrist fracture, second compartment, 4.9 mm penetration. Postoperative lateral, 45° supination, 45° pronation, dorsal tangential and USG images. a Lateral. b Penetrating screw was not detectable on the 45° pronation radiograph. c Penetration was barely seen on the 45° supination radiograph. d Screw penetration on tangential radiograph. e 4.9 mm penetrating screw in the second compartment was seen by ultrasonography
Demographic characteristics
| Min–Max | Mean ± Standard deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 18–58 | 37.40 ± 9.76 | |
|
| % | ||
| Gender | Female | 14 | 29.8 |
| Male | 33 | 70.2 |
Descriptive characteristics
|
| Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Right | 26 | 55.3 |
| Left | 21 | 44.7 | |
| Fracture type | C1 | 9 | 19.1 |
| C2 | 15 | 31.9 | |
| C3 | 23 | 48.9 | |
| Screw penetration on USG | No | 35 | 74.5 |
| Yes | 12 | 25.5 | |
| Lateral radiograph | No | 42 | 89.4 |
| Yes | 5 | 10.6 | |
| 45° supination view | No | 41 | 87.2 |
| Yes | 6 | 12.8 | |
| 45° pronation view | No | 45 | 95.7 |
| Yes | 2 | 4.3 | |
| Dorsal tangential view | No | 40 | 85.1 |
| Yes | 7 | 14.9 | |
| Complaint | No | 40 | 85.1 |
| Tenosynovitis | 7 | 14.9 | |
| Plate removal | No | 40 | 85.1 |
| Yes | 7 | 14.9 |
Diagnostic screening tests and ROC curve results according to USG screw penetration
| Diagnostic scan | Kappa agreement | ROC curve |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | Area | 95% Confidence interval | |||
| Lateral radiograph | 41.67 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 83.33 | 0.515 | 0.708 | 0.511–0.905 | 0.033* |
| 45° supination view | 50.00 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 85.37 | 0.598 | 0.750 | 0.560–0.940 | 0.010* |
| 45° pronation view | 16.67 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 77.78 | 0.230 | 0.583 | 0.382–0.784 | 0.393 |
| Dorsal tangential view | 58.33 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 87.50 | 0.676 | 0.792 | 0.611–0.972 | 0.003** |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
General characteristics of patients with screw penetration
| Patient no | Age | Site | Radiography | USG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral radiograph | 45° supination view | 45° pronation view | Dorsal tangential view | ||||
| 2 | 28 | Right | – | – | – | – | 1 mm, 3.comp |
| 6 | 33 | Left | – | + | + | + | 2.1 mm, 2.comp + 1.8 mm 4.comp |
| 8 | 54 | Left | + | + | – | + | 4.9 mm, 2.comp |
| 11 | 41 | Right | – | + | – | + | 2.7 and 2.4 mm, 2.comp |
| 14 | 38 | Left | – | – | – | – | 1.1 mm, 4.comp |
| 18 | 44 | Right | + | + | – | + | 2.2 mm, 3.comp |
| 25 | 46 | Right | – | – | – | – | 1.8 mm, 2. comp |
| 29 | 42 | Left | + | + | – | + | 5.8 mm, 2.comp |
| 34 | 34 | Left | – | + | – | – | 1.6 mm, 2.comp |
| 37 | 36 | Right | – | – | – | + | 1.8 mm, 3.comp |
| 43 | 48 | Right | + | – | – | + | 2 mm, 3.comp |
| 45 | 24 | Left | + | – | + | – | 2.1 mm, 4.comp |
Fig. 2Patient number 25. Right distal radius fracture, 1.8 mm penetrating screw in the second compartment. Postoperative lateral, 45° supination, 45° pronation, dorsal tangential and USG images. a Lateral. b 45° supination view. c Penetrating screw was barely detectable on the 45° pronation radiograph. d No penetration on dorsal tangential view radiograph. e 1.8 mm penetrating screw in the second compartment was seen on USG