| Literature DB >> 29615047 |
Cedric D J Mbouna1, Rufin M T Kouipou1,2, Rodrigue Keumoe1, Lauve R Y Tchokouaha1,3, Patrick V T Fokou1, Brice M T Tali1, Dinkar Sahal2, Fabrice F Boyom4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergence and spread of malaria parasites resistant to artemisinin-based combination therapy stresses the need for novel drugs against malaria. Investigating plants used in traditional medicine to treat malaria remains a credible option for new anti-malarial drug development. This study was aimed at investigating the antiplasmodial activity and selectivity of extracts and fractions from Terminalia mantaly and Terminalia superba (Combretaceae) that are used in Cameroon to treat malaria.Entities:
Keywords: Antiplasmodial; Plasmodium falciparum; Selectivity; Terminalia mantaly; Terminalia superba
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29615047 PMCID: PMC5883263 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2298-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Scheme showing the successive solid–liquid extractions of the crude extracts using organic solvents
Crude extracts preparation yields and activity parameters
| Plant | Part | Solvent | Extract code | Extraction yield (%) | IC50 ± SD (µg/mL) | RI | CC50 (µg/mL) | Selectivity Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Leaf | Water | 35.50 | 2.09 ± 0.06 | 2.66 ± 0.31 | 0.79 | > 200 | > 95.69 | > 75.19 | |
| Methanol | 19.54 | 2.69 ± 0.04 | 2.61 ± 0.43 | 1.03 | > 200 | > 74.35 | > 76.63 | |||
| Stem bark | Water | 19.93 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 1.03 ± 0.04 | 0.25 | > 200 | > 769.23 | > 194.17 | ||
| Methanol | 19.32 | 3.63 ± 0.50 | 2.91 ± 0.12 | 1.25 | > 200 | > 55.10 | > 68.73 | |||
| Root | Water | 07.45 | > 25 | > 25 | – | – | – | – | ||
| Methanol | 09.01 | 7.01 ± 0.82 | 5.04 ± 0.68 | 1.39 | > 200 | > 28.53 | > 39.68 | |||
|
| Leaf | Water | 17.18 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 1.26 ± 0.12 | 0.45 | > 200 | > 350.88 | > 158.73 | |
| Methanol | 12.07 | 3.38 ± 0.54 | 2.13 ± 0.13 | 1.59 | > 200 | > 59.17 | > 93.90 | |||
| Stem bark | Water | 14.15 | 3.70 ± 0.03 | 1.42 ± 0.09 | 2.61 | > 200 | > 54.05 | > 140.85 | ||
| Methanol | 10.35 | 2.68 ± 0.20 | 1.85 ± 0.13 | 1.44 | > 200 | > 74.63 | > 108.11 | |||
| Root | Water | 04.54 | 18.88 ± 0.14 | 16.43 ± 0.14 | 1.15 | – | – | – | ||
| Methanol | 02.27 | 2.38 ± 0.08 | 2.28 ± 0.20 | 1.04 | > 200 | > 84.03 | > 87.72 | |||
| Reference drug | Chloroquine (µM) | – | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 10.00 | – | – | – | ||
Activity data are presented as means of triplicate experiments
IC50: 50% inhibitory concentration; CC50: 50% cell cytotoxic concentration, cytotoxicity was tested against HEK239T cells; SD: standard deviation from triplicate experiments; RI: resistance index; resistance index was calculated as the ratio of IC50 PfINDOresistant/IC50Pf3D7sensitive; SI: selectivity index; Tm: Terminalia mantaly; Ts: Terminalia superba; l: leaf; sb: stem bark; r: root; w: water; m: methanol
Fig. 2Dose–response curves of Terminalia mantaly and Terminalia superba crude extracts on Plasmodium falciparum INDO and 3D7 strains (Tm: Terminalia mantaly; Ts: Terminalia superba; l: leaf; sb: stem bark; r: roots; w: water; m: methanol)
Yields of crude extracts fractionation and activity parameters
| Plant | Crude extract | Solvent | Fraction code | Fraction yield (%) | IC50 ± SD (µg/mL) | RI | CC50 (µg/mL) | Selectivity index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Hexane | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Chl | 20.78 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 0.37 | > 200 | > 555.55 | > 208.33 | |||
| EA | 2.54 | 6.74 ± 0.49 | 6.88 ± 0.58 | 0.98 | > 200 | > 29.67 | > 29.07 | |||
| – | 43.79 | > 25 | > 25 | – | – | – | – | |||
| Hexane | 0.16 | 4.50 ± 0.24 | 4.40 ± 0.27 | 1.02 | > 200 | > 44.44 | > 45.45 | |||
| Chl | 0.67 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 1.12 ± 0.07 | 0.5 | > 200 | > 357.14 | > 178.57 | |||
| EA | 1.26 | 0.68 ± 0.14 | 1.35 ± 0.42 | 0.5 | > 200 | > 294.11 | > 148.15 | |||
| – | 31.35 | 2.80 ± 0.21 | 2.44 ± 0.16 | 1.15 | > 200 | > 71.43 | > 8.97 | |||
|
| Hexane | 0.7 | 14.09 ± 1.88 | 6.99 ± 0.68 | 2.02 | 126.03 | > 14.19 | > 28.61 | ||
| Chl | 4.74 | > 25 | > 25 | – | – | – | – | |||
| EA | 4.47 | 6.89 ± 0.94 | 7.06 ± 0.76 | 0.97 | > 200 | > 29.03 | > 28.33 | |||
| – | 61.9 | > 25 | > 25 | – | – | – | – | |||
| Hexane | 19.36 | > 25 | > 25 | – | – | – | – | |||
| Chl | 5.54 | 2.26 ± 0.09 | 4.93 ± 0.73 | 0.46 | > 200 | > 88.49 | > 40.57 | |||
| EA | 6.18 | 1.82 ± 0.04 | 1.65 ± 0.24 | 1.1 | > 200 | > 109.89 | > 121.21 | |||
| – | 63.82 | 5.22 ± 0.26 | 4.70 ± 1.47 | 1.11 | > 200 | > 38.31 | > 42.55 | |||
| Reference drug | Chloroquine (µM) | – | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 10 | – | – | – | ||
Activity data are presented as means of triplicate experiments
IC50: 50% inhibitory concentration; CC50: 50% cell cytotoxic concentration, cytotoxicity was tested against HEK239T cells; SD: standard deviation from triplicate experiments; RI: resistance index; resistance index was calculated as the ratio of IC50 PfINDOresistant/IC50Pf3D7sensitive; SI: selectivity index; Tm: Terminalia mantaly; Ts: Terminalia superba; Tmlw: Terminalia mantaly leaf water extract; Tmsbw: Terminalia mantaly stem bark water extract; Tslw: Terminalia superba leaf water extract; Tsrm: Terminalia superba root methanol extract; R3: final residue; H: hexane; Chl: chloroform; EA: ethyl acetate
Fig. 3a, b Dose-response curves of fractions from Terminalia mantaly and Terminalia superba on Plasmodium falciparum INDO and 3D7 strains (Tm: Terminalia mantaly; Ts: Terminalia superba; Tmlw: Terminalia mantaly leaf water extract; Tmsbw: Terminalia mantaly stem bark water extract; Tslw: Terminalia superba leaf water extract; Tsrm: Terminalia superba root methanol extract; H: hexane; Chl: chloroform; EA: ethyl acetate; R3: final residue)