| Literature DB >> 29615044 |
Jenna E Coalson1,2, Lauren M Cohee3, Andrea G Buchwald3, Andrew Nyambalo4, John Kubale5, Karl B Seydel6, Don Mathanga7, Terrie E Taylor6, Miriam K Laufer3, Mark L Wilson8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria persists in some high-transmission areas despite extensive control efforts. Progress toward elimination may require effective targeting of specific human populations that act as key transmission reservoirs.Entities:
Keywords: Gametocytes; Malaria; Plasmodium falciparum; School-age children; Simulation model; Transmission reservoirs
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29615044 PMCID: PMC5883608 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2295-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Graphical depiction of model. Anopheles mosquitoes feed on humans with a relative frequency that depends on age and bed net use (dotted lines). The likelihood that a person carries P. falciparum parasites (colored figures) depends on age, and the likelihood that a blood meal leads to an oocyst infection in the mosquito (colored mosquitoes) is influenced by the distribution of gametocyte densities in infections in each age group. The model ultimately estimates the proportion of new mosquito infections that can be attributed to having fed on humans in each age group
Model parameter description and data sources
| Parameter | Description | Source | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Number of humans of age group | Calculated, Eq. |
|
|
| Number of people in age group | 2008 Census [ | |
|
| Prevalence of | ICEMR-Malawi primary data | See Table |
|
| Proportion of infections in age group | ICEMR-Malawi primary data | See Table |
|
| Percent of mosquitoes infected with oocysts after a blood meal from a person with gametocytes at density | Churcher et al. [ | 0.015 |
|
| Relative infectivity per blood meal by age category | Ouédraogo et al. [ | 2.5 |
|
| Relative mosquito biting frequency by human age group | Calculated, Eq. |
|
|
| Vector’s relative feeding preference for human age group | Stone et al. [ | 1.0 (ref) |
|
| Proportion of people in age group | ICEMR-Malawi primary data | See Table |
|
| Relative reduction in nightly biting frequency for bed net users compared to non-users | Killeen et al. [ | 0.40 |
|
| Relative number of new mosquito oocyst infections attributable to human age group | Calculated, Eq. |
|
|
| Fraction of all new mosquito infections attributable to human age group | Calculated, Eq. |
|
ICEMR International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research
Population characteristics by season and estimated distribution of human reservoirs of infection
| Age group | % of population ( | Dry season | Rainy season | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITN usage, | % of | ITN usage, | % of | ||||
| Children (< 5 years) | 18.2 | 7.7 | 53.4 | 12.4 | 13.6 | 70.1 | 13.8 |
| SAC (5–15 years) | 30.0 | 18.9 | 33.6 | 50.2 | 26.6 | 49.0 | 44.3 |
| Young adults (16–30 years) | 27.2 | 10.8 | 59.7 | 26.0 | 16.3 | 65.3 | 24.6 |
| Adults (> 30 years) | 24.7 | 5.2 | 56.4 | 11.3 | 12.7 | 63.0 | 17.4 |
aEstimated percent of parasite carriers that are from each age group, (N/N)*α
Fig. 2qPCR-based prevalence of P. falciparum infection, stratified by qRT-PCR-predicted gametocyte density
Fig. 3Predicted transmission contributions under different assumptions about mosquito feeding frequency by human age
Fig. 4Predicted transmission contributions in a sensitivity analysis varying human-to-mosquito infectivity (κ) by age. Infectivity to mosquitoes may vary with human age in relation to differences in recent antimalarial treatment, treatment-blocking immunity, duration of infection, multiplicity of infection, or other unknown factors, all of which could differ with age, even after accounting for gametocyte presence and density. Thus a sensitivity analysis was performed for transmission contribution when varying infectivity by age with outside bounds informed by the scientific literature on membrane feeding experiments that accounted for gametocyte status. Infectivity of children under 5 years and school-age children were varied relative to the infectivity of young adults (16–30 years)
Fig. 5Extreme possibilities of reservoir contributions from sensitivity analysis of human-to-mosquito infectivity (κ). Examples of extreme ends of the sensitivity analysis varying human-to-mosquito infectivity, as described in “Methods” and in Fig. 4