Gerhard Ransmayr1, Philipp Hermann2, Katharina Sallinger2, Thomas Benke3, Stephan Seiler4, Peter Dal-Bianco5, Josef Marksteiner6, Michaela Defrancesco7, Günter Sanin3, Walter Struhal1, Michael Guger1, Milan Vosko1, Karin Hagenauer8, Riccarda Lehner1, Andreas Futschik2, Reinhold Schmidt4. 1. Department of Neurology 2, Med Campus III, Kepler University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria. 2. Department of Applied Statistics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria. 3. Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria. 4. Department of Neurology, Section of Neurogeriatrics, Medical University Graz, Austria. 5. Department of Neurology, Medical University Vienna, Austria. 6. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Regional Hospital Hall, Austria. 7. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University Innsbruck, Austria. 8. Department for Clinical and Health Psychology, Med Campus III, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive studies on caregiver burden (CB) of persons caring for dementia patients differ methodologically and show variable results. OBJECTIVE: Analysis of known and hypothesized factors of CB in home care of dementia patients. METHODS: Multicenter longitudinal study comprising 585 persons caring mostly for Alzheimer's disease patients (age median 77.25 years, Mini-Mental State Examination raw score median 23) using the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (CBI). Known patient-related determinants of CB were studied, such as dementia severity (Clinical Dementia Rating, CDR), neuropsychological deficits (CERAD-Plus), neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory, NPI), disability (Disability Assessment for Dementia, DAD), dependency (Dependency Scale, DS), and moreover, unclarified potential factors (age, sex, education of patients; age, sex, occupational status of the caregivers; family relationship). Psychological and somatic effects of CB were analyzed (factor analysis). RESULTS: Caregiver age was median 61. Female caregivers prevailed (67.8%). Median CBI sum score (CBIss) was 16 at baseline. After two years, CBIss was 22 and 37% of the caregivers reported mild to moderate (CBIss 21-40), 16.8% moderate to severe or severe (≥41), and 46.2% absent to little CB (CBIss ≤ 20). CB correlated positively with NPI, CDR, DS scores, disability (DAD), years of education of the patients, and proximity of patient and caregiver sex (female), and negatively with caregiver age. Caregivers reported restrictions of time, health problems, and negative emotions. CONCLUSION: The findings are applicable to identify persons at risk for substantial CB and its consequences. There is demand for personal, psychological, and medical support of caregivers and increasing male participation.
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive studies on caregiver burden (CB) of persons caring for dementiapatients differ methodologically and show variable results. OBJECTIVE: Analysis of known and hypothesized factors of CB in home care of dementiapatients. METHODS: Multicenter longitudinal study comprising 585 persons caring mostly for Alzheimer's diseasepatients (age median 77.25 years, Mini-Mental State Examination raw score median 23) using the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (CBI). Known patient-related determinants of CB were studied, such as dementia severity (Clinical Dementia Rating, CDR), neuropsychological deficits (CERAD-Plus), neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory, NPI), disability (Disability Assessment for Dementia, DAD), dependency (Dependency Scale, DS), and moreover, unclarified potential factors (age, sex, education of patients; age, sex, occupational status of the caregivers; family relationship). Psychological and somatic effects of CB were analyzed (factor analysis). RESULTS: Caregiver age was median 61. Female caregivers prevailed (67.8%). Median CBI sum score (CBIss) was 16 at baseline. After two years, CBIss was 22 and 37% of the caregivers reported mild to moderate (CBIss 21-40), 16.8% moderate to severe or severe (≥41), and 46.2% absent to little CB (CBIss ≤ 20). CB correlated positively with NPI, CDR, DS scores, disability (DAD), years of education of the patients, and proximity of patient and caregiver sex (female), and negatively with caregiver age. Caregivers reported restrictions of time, health problems, and negative emotions. CONCLUSION: The findings are applicable to identify persons at risk for substantial CB and its consequences. There is demand for personal, psychological, and medical support of caregivers and increasing male participation.
Authors: Jennifer A Ouellet; Gregory M Ouellet; Alison M Romegialli; Marilyn Hirsch; Lisa Berardi; Christine M Ramsey; Leo M Cooney; Lisa M Walke Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Michael Guger; Stefan Raschbacher; Lukas Kellermair; Milan R Vosko; Christian Eggers; Thomas Forstner; Karin Leitner; Alexandra Fuchs; Franz Fellner; Gerhard Ransmayr Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Lukas Kellermair; Alexandra Fuchs; Christian Eggers; Petra Schwingenschuh; Mariella Kögl; Franz Fellner; Thomas Forstner; Stephanie Mangesius; Michael Guger; Gerhard Ransmayr Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 3.575