Literature DB >> 29614152

Decision-variable correlation.

Stephen Sebastian1, Wilson S Geisler1.   

Abstract

An extension of the signal-detection theory framework is described and demonstrated for two-alternative identification tasks. The extended framework assumes that the subject and an arbitrary model (or two subjects, or the same subject on two occasions) are performing the same task with the same stimuli, and that on each trial they both compute values of a decision variable. Thus, their joint performance is described by six fundamental quantities: two levels of intrinsic discriminability (d'), two values of decision criterion, and two decision-variable correlations (DVCs), one for each of the two categories of stimuli. The framework should be widely applicable for testing models and characterizing individual differences in behavioral and neurophysiological studies of perception and cognition. We demonstrate the framework for the well-known task of detecting a Gaussian target in white noise. We find that (a) subjects' DVCs are approximately equal to the square root of their efficiency relative to ideal (in agreement with the prediction of a popular class of models), (b) between-subjects and within-subject (double-pass) DVCs increase with target contrast and are greater for target-present than target-absent trials (rejecting many models), (c) model parameters can be estimated by maximizing DVCs between the model and subject, (d) a model with a center-surround template and a specific (modest) level of position uncertainty predicts the trial-by-trial performance of subjects as well as (or better than) presenting the same stimulus again to the subjects (i.e., the double-pass DVCs), and (e) models of trial-by-trial performance should not include a representation of internal noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29614152      PMCID: PMC5885773          DOI: 10.1167/18.4.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  15 in total

1.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise.

Authors:  Z L Lu; B A Dosher
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Noise reveals visual mechanisms of detection and discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme.

Authors:  B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-10-20

4.  Classification images with uncertainty.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Anirvan S Nandy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Similar neural representations of the target for saccades and perception during search.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Brent R Beutter; Binh T Pham; Steven S Shimozaki; Leland S Stone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  How Can Single Sensory Neurons Predict Behavior?

Authors:  Xaq Pitkow; Sheng Liu; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency.

Authors:  A E Burgess; B Colborne
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.

Authors:  A E Burgess; R F Wagner; R J Jennings; H B Barlow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Two procedures for estimating internal noise.

Authors:  M F Spiegel; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Visual signal detection. III. On Bayesian use of prior knowledge and cross correlation.

Authors:  A Burgess
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.

Authors:  U-Cheng Leong; Douglas M Schwarz; Kenneth S Henry; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Predicting the Partition of Behavioral Variability in Speed Perception with Naturalistic Stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin M Chin; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Local reliability weighting explains identification of partially masked objects in natural images.

Authors:  Stephen Sebastian; Eric S Seemiller; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Linking V1 Activity to Behavior.

Authors:  Eyal Seidemann; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.422

Review 5.  Animal models of hidden hearing loss: Does auditory-nerve-fiber loss cause real-world listening difficulties?

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.314

6.  Identifying cues for tone-in-noise detection using decision variable correlation in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spatial summation in the human fovea: Do normal optical aberrations and fixational eye movements have an effect?

Authors:  William S Tuten; Robert F Cooper; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Alfredo Dubra; Austin Roorda; Nicolas P Cottaris; David H Brainard; Jessica I W Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Distinguishing shadows from surface boundaries using local achromatic cues.

Authors:  Christopher DiMattina; Josiah J Burnham; Betul N Guner; Haley B Yerxa
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.779

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.