Literature DB >> 29613843

Intraprocedural Ablation Margin Assessment by Using Ammonia Perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided Liver Tumor Ablation: A Pilot Study.

Paul B Shyn1, Leigh C Casadaban1, Nisha I Sainani1, Cheryl A Sadow1, Paul M Bunch1, Vincent M Levesque1, Chun K Kim1, Victor H Gerbaudo1, Stuart G Silverman1.   

Abstract

Purpose To prospectively determine whether nitrogen 13 (13N) ammonia perfusion positron emission tomography (PET) during fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT)-guided liver tumor ablation can be used to intraprocedurally assess ablation margins. Materials and Methods Eight patients (five women and three men; age range, 36-74 years; mean age, 57 years) were enrolled in this pilot study and underwent FDG PET/CT-guided microwave ablation of 11 FDG-avid liver metastases (mean diameter, 22 mm; range, 11-34 mm). All procedures were performed between March 2014 and December 2016. Complete ablation margin visibility and minimum ablation margin thickness were assessed by using intraprocedural 13N-ammonia perfusion PET compared with 24-hour postprocedural MR imaging by two independent blinded radiologists. Local tumor progression for each ablated tumor was assessed at follow-up imaging for 3-38 months (median, 17.6 months). Descriptive analysis was performed. Results Eleven of 11 (100%) ablation margins were fully assessable by using intraprocedural perfusion PET by both readers; six of eleven (55%) margins were fully assessable by both readers at postprocedural 24-hour MR imaging. By using perfusion PET, one tumor that had been judged by both readers to have a minimum margin of 0 mm progressed locally. No tumors judged to have a minimum margin greater than 0 mm at perfusion PET progressed locally. Conclusion 13N-ammonia perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided liver tumor ablations can potentially be used to intraprocedurally assess the entire ablation margin, including the minimum margin. © RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29613843     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Assessing ablation margins of FDG-avid liver tumors during PET/CT-guided thermal ablation procedures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Leigh C Casadaban; Paul J Catalano; Leslie K Lee; Hyewon Hyun; Kemal Tuncali; Victor H Gerbaudo; Paul B Shyn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  13N-NH3 PET/CT in oncological disease.

Authors:  Domenico Albano; Raffaele Giubbini; Francesco Bertagna
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Nuclear Cardiac Imaging in the Interventional Suite.

Authors:  Zachary Pickell; Albert J Sinusas
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Immunofluorescence Assay of Ablated Colorectal Liver Metastases: The Frozen Section of Image-Guided Tumor Ablation?

Authors:  Nikiforos Vasiniotis Kamarinos; Efsevia Vakiani; Sho Fujisawa; Mithat Gonen; Ning Fan; Yevgeniy Romin; Richard K G Do; Etay Ziv; Joseph P Erinjeri; Elena N Petre; Vlasios S Sotirchos; Juan C Camacho; Stephen B Solomon; Katia Manova-Todorova; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.682

5.  F-18 FDG perfusion PET: intraprocedural assessment of the liver tumor ablation margin.

Authors:  Paul B Shyn; Alan J Cubre; Paul J Catalano; Leslie K Lee; Hyewon Hyun; Kemal Tuncali; Julia G Seol; Vincent M Levesque; Victor H Gerbaudo; Tina Kapur; Ryan T Chao; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-19

6.  Safety margin assessment after microwave ablation of liver tumors: inter- and intrareader variability.

Authors:  Jan Schaible; Benedikt Pregler; Wolf Bäumler; Ingo Einspieler; Ernst-Michael Jung; Christian Stroszczynski; Lukas Philipp Beyer
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 7.  Image-Guided Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Principles, Current Evidence, and the Path Forward.

Authors:  Yuan-Mao Lin; Iwan Paolucci; Kristy K Brock; Bruno C Odisio
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Biopsy and Margins Optimize Outcomes after Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Nikiforos Vasiniotis Kamarinos; Efsevia Vakiani; Mithat Gonen; Nancy E Kemeny; Carlie Sigel; Leonard B Saltz; Karen T Brown; Anne M Covey; Joseph P Erinjeri; Lynn A Brody; Etay Ziv; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Henry Kunin; Afsar Barlas; Elena N Petre; Peter T Kingham; Michael I D'Angelica; Katia Manova-Todorova; Stephen B Solomon; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation.

Authors:  Brett Z Fite; James Wang; Pejman Ghanouni; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  BME Front       Date:  2022-05-02

10.  [Advances and Challenges of Local Thermal Ablation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Authors:  Qing Gou; Zejian Zhou; Mingfang Zhao; Xiaoming Chen; Qing Zhou
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.