Literature DB >> 29613830

Laryngeal Force Sensor: Quantifying Extralaryngeal Complications after Suspension Microlaryngoscopy.

Allen L Feng1,2, Phillip C Song1,2.   

Abstract

Objectives To develop a novel sensor capable of dynamically analyzing the force exerted during suspension microlaryngoscopy and to examine the relationship between force and postoperative tongue complications. Study Design Prospective observational study. Setting Academic tertiary care center. Methods The laryngeal force sensor is a designed for use during microphonosurgery. Prospectively enrolled patients completed pre- and postoperative surveys to assess the development of tongue-related symptoms (dysgeusia, pain, paresthesia, and paresis) or dysphagia (10-item Eating Assessment Tool [EAT-10]). To prevent operator bias, surgeons were blinded to the force recordings during surgery. Results Fifty-six patients completed the study. Of these, 20 (36%) developed postoperative tongue symptoms, and 12 (21%) had abnormal EAT-10 scores. The mean maximum force across all procedures was 164.7 N (95% CI, 141.0-188.4; range, 48.5-402.6), while the mean suspension time was 34.3 minutes (95% CI, 27.4-41.2; range, 7.1-108.1). Multiple logistic regression showed maximum force (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29; P = .019) and female sex (30.1%; 95% CI, 22.7%-37.5%; P < .001) as significant predictors for the development of tongue-related symptoms. The only significant predictor of an abnormal postoperative EAT-10 score was an increased maximum force (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06; P = .045). Conclusions The laryngeal force sensor is capable of providing dynamic force measurements throughout suspension microlaryngoscopy. An increase in maximum force during surgery may be a significant predictor for the development of tongue-related symptoms and an abnormal EAT-10 score. Female patients may also be at greater risk for developing postoperative tongue symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EAT-10; biomechanical analysis; device design; force sensor; laryngology; laryngoscopy; suspension microlaryngoscopy; tongue symptoms

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29613830     DOI: 10.1177/0194599818768482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  4 in total

1.  Design, development, and face validation of an intubation simulation device using real-time force data feedback.

Authors:  Gopikrishna M Rao; Vishwanatha M Rao; Jeremy Juang; Justin Benoit; Allen L Feng; Phillip C Song
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-15

2.  Laryngeal fractures in professional and semiprofessional ice hockey players.

Authors:  Allen L Feng; Ayush Parikh; Shekhar K Gadkaree; Matthew R Naunheim; Phillip C Song
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-16

3.  Comparison of Dental Injury Rates in Perioperative Intubation and Suspension Laryngoscopy for Otolaryngology Procedures.

Authors:  Caleb P Wilson; Erica Romano; Nilesh R Vasan
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-12-12

4.  Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society.

Authors:  Frederik G Dikkers; Michel R M San Giorgi; Rico N P M Rinkel; Marc Remacle; Antoine Giovanni; Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Riaz Seedat; Guillermo Campos; Guri S Sandhu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.