Literature DB >> 29608230

Comparisons of self and proxy report on health-related factors in people with intellectual disability.

Haleigh M Scott1, Susan M Havercamp2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intellectual disability field has learned about the lives of people with intellectual disabilities (ID), largely from the perspective of their family and caregivers. Information from caregivers has been critical to scientific advancement, especially when caregivers are engaged on behalf of individuals with significant language impairment. On the other hand, the perspective of individuals with ID themselves is critical for internal subjective content such as thoughts and feelings.
METHODS: Participants were 90 adults with ID and a proxy of their choosing.
RESULTS: Overall, self and caregiver report were significantly related for subjective health but varied for physical activity, social support and stress.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings add to the growing literature establishing the importance of considering the self-report of adults with ID, particularity when the subject matter focuses on internal thoughts or feelings. Clinical considerations for the use of self and proxy report are discussed.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health; intellectual disability; proxy report; self report; social support; stress

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29608230     DOI: 10.1111/jar.12452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil        ISSN: 1360-2322


  6 in total

1.  Testing a Wellness Indicators Measure for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilitiesa.

Authors:  Matthew Bogenschutz; Michael Broda; Sarah Lineberry; Parthenia Dinora; Seb Prohn
Journal:  Dev Disabil Netw J       Date:  2021

Review 2.  Proxy-report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review.

Authors:  Stephanie L Santoro; Karen Donelan; Melissa Constantine
Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Toward a Comprehensive Assessment of Relationships with Teachers and Parents for Youth with Intellectual Disabilities.

Authors:  Céleste Dubé; Elizabeth Olivier; Alexandre J S Morin; Danielle Tracey; Rhonda G Craven; Christophe Maïano
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-06-29

4.  Differentiating care for persons with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: a Delphi study on the opinions of primary and professional caregivers and scientists.

Authors:  Peter J G Nouwens; Nienke B M Smulders; Petri J C M Embregts; Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study.

Authors:  Matthew Crocker; Claire Hutchinson; Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa; Ruth Walker; Gang Chen; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Reconciling communication repertoires: navigating interactions involving persons with severe/profound intellectual disability, a classic grounded theory study.

Authors:  A-M Martin; T Andrews; J Goldbart; M Landers
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2022-02-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.