Thorsten Derlin1, Viktor Grünwald, Jörg Steinbach, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Tobias L Ross. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School; Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School; Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden; Department of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anatomical and molecular data can be acquired simultaneously through the use of positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a hybrid technique. A variety of radiopharmaceuticals can be used to characterize various metabolic processes or to visualize the expression of receptors, enzymes, and other molecular target structures. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, as well as on guidelines from Germany and abroad and on systematic reviews and meta-analyses. RESULTS: Established radiopharmaceuticals for PET, such as 2-[18F]fluoro-2- deoxyglucose ([18F]FDG), enable the visualization of physiological processes on the molecular level and can provide vital information for clinical decision-making. For example, PET can be used to evaluate pulmonary nodules for malignancy with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity. It can be used both for initial staging and for the guidance of further treatment. Alongside the PET radiopharmaceuticals that have already been well studied and evaluated, newer ones are increasingly becoming available for the noninvasive phenotyping of tumor diseases, e.g., for analyzing the expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), of somatostatin receptors, or of chemokine receptors on tumor cells. CONCLUSION: PET is an important component of diagnostic algorithms in oncology. It can help make diagnosis more precise and treatment more individualized. An increasing number of PET radiopharmaceuticals are now expanding the available options for imaging. Many radiopharmaceuticals can be used not only for noninvasive analysis of the expression of therapeutically relevant target structures, but also for the ensuing, target-directed treatment with radionuclides.
BACKGROUND: Anatomical and molecular data can be acquired simultaneously through the use of positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a hybrid technique. A variety of radiopharmaceuticals can be used to characterize various metabolic processes or to visualize the expression of receptors, enzymes, and other molecular target structures. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, as well as on guidelines from Germany and abroad and on systematic reviews and meta-analyses. RESULTS: Established radiopharmaceuticals for PET, such as 2-[18F]fluoro-2- deoxyglucose ([18F]FDG), enable the visualization of physiological processes on the molecular level and can provide vital information for clinical decision-making. For example, PET can be used to evaluate pulmonary nodules for malignancy with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity. It can be used both for initial staging and for the guidance of further treatment. Alongside the PET radiopharmaceuticals that have already been well studied and evaluated, newer ones are increasingly becoming available for the noninvasive phenotyping of tumor diseases, e.g., for analyzing the expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), of somatostatin receptors, or of chemokine receptors on tumor cells. CONCLUSION: PET is an important component of diagnostic algorithms in oncology. It can help make diagnosis more precise and treatment more individualized. An increasing number of PET radiopharmaceuticals are now expanding the available options for imaging. Many radiopharmaceuticals can be used not only for noninvasive analysis of the expression of therapeutically relevant target structures, but also for the ensuing, target-directed treatment with radionuclides.
Authors: Anders Sundin; Rudolf Arnold; Eric Baudin; Jaroslaw B Cwikla; Barbro Eriksson; Stefano Fanti; Nicola Fazio; Francesco Giammarile; Rodney J Hicks; Andreas Kjaer; Eric Krenning; Dik Kwekkeboom; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan M O'Connor; Dermot O'Toole; Andrea Rockall; Bertram Wiedenmann; Juan W Valle; Marie-Pierre Vullierme Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: Remco de Bree; Lisa van der Putten; Harm van Tinteren; Jan Wedman; Wim J G Oyen; Luuk M Janssen; Michiel W M van den Brekel; Emile F I Comans; Jan Pruim; Robert P Takes; Monique G G Hobbelink; Renato Valdés Olmos; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Maarten Boers; Otto S Hoekstra; C René Leemans Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Damian Wild; Jamshed B Bomanji; Pascal Benkert; Helmut Maecke; Peter J Ell; Jean Claude Reubi; Martyn E Caplin Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Elizabeth A Kidd; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Janet S Rader; David G Mutch; Matthew A Powell; Perry W Grigsby Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Donna E Maziak; Gail E Darling; Richard I Inculet; Karen Y Gulenchyn; Albert A Driedger; Yee C Ung; John D Miller; Chu-Shu Gu; Kathryn J Cline; William K Evans; Mark N Levine Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-07-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Tim Holland-Letz; Frederik L Giesel; Clemens Kratochwil; Walter Mier; Sabine Haufe; Nils Debus; Matthias Eder; Michael Eisenhut; Martin Schäfer; Oliver Neels; Markus Hohenfellner; Klaus Kopka; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Meredith A Jones; William M MacCuaig; Alex N Frickenstein; Seda Camalan; Metin N Gurcan; Jennifer Holter-Chakrabarty; Katherine T Morris; Molly W McNally; Kristina K Booth; Steven Carter; William E Grizzle; Lacey R McNally Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2021-02-04
Authors: Francisco Silva; António Paulo; Agnès Pallier; Sandra Même; Éva Tóth; Lurdes Gano; Fernanda Marques; Carlos F G C Geraldes; M Margarida C A Castro; Ana M Cardoso; Amália S Jurado; Pilar López-Larrubia; Sara Lacerda; Maria Paula Cabral Campello Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 3.623