Literature DB >> 16157939

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Norbert Avril1, Stefanie Sassen, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Joerg Naehrig, Stephan Rutke, Wolfgang A Weber, Martin Werner, Henner Graeff, Markus Schwaiger, Walther Kuhn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to predict patient outcome after the first and third cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIIC and IV) ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients received three cycles of carboplatin-based chemotherapy, followed by cytoreductive surgery. Quantitative FDG-PET of the abdomen and pelvis was acquired before treatment and after the first and third cycle of chemotherapy. Changes in tumoral FDG uptake, expressed as standardized uptake values (SUV), were compared with clinical and histopathologic response; overall survival served as a reference.
RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between FDG-PET metabolic response after the first (P = .008) and third (P = .005) cycle of chemotherapy and overall survival. By using a threshold for decrease in SUV from baseline of 20% after the first cycle, median overall survival was 38.3 months in metabolic responders compared with 23.1 months in metabolic nonresponders. At a threshold of 55% decrease in SUV after the third cycle median overall survival was 38.9 months in metabolic responders compared with 19.7 months in nonresponders. There was no correlation between clinical response criteria (P = .7) or CA125 response criteria (P = .5) and overall survival. There was only a weak correlation (P = .09) between histopathologic response criteria and overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Sequential FDG-PET predicted patient outcome as early as after the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and was more accurate than clinical or histopathologic response criteria including changes in tumor marker CA125. FDG-PET appears to be a promising tool for early prediction of response to chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16157939     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  71 in total

1.  Early evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response using FDG-PET/CT predicts survival prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Masahiro Kikuchi; Yuji Nakamoto; Shogo Shinohara; Keizo Fujiwara; Hiroshi Yamazaki; Yuji Kanazawa; Risa Kurihara; Ippei Kishimoto; Hiroyuki Harada; Yasushi Naito
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.

Authors:  R K Doot; J S Scheuermann; P E Christian; J S Karp; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  In vivo imaging in cancer.

Authors:  John Condeelis; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 4.  Spectrum of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yoshiko Ueno; Tetsuo Maeda; Koji Murakami; Yasushi Kaji; Masato Kita; Kayo Suzuki; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 5.  Biological imaging for selecting and monitoring cancer therapy; a pathway to individualised therapy.

Authors:  Markus Schwaiger; Christian Peschel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Potential role of coregistered photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging in ovarian cancer detection and characterization.

Authors:  Andres Aguirre; Yasaman Ardeshirpour; Mary M Sanders; Molly Brewer; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Claude Touzery; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Bruno Coudert; Laurent Arnould; Christophe Boichot; Alexandre Cochet; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Clinical applications of metabolomics in oncology: a review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Spratlin; Natalie J Serkova; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  18F-FDG PET/CT evaluation of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrei H Iagaru; Erik S Mittra; Iain Ross McDougall; Andrew Quon; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.