Literature DB >> 29607668

Weight-Bearing Radiographic Analysis of the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis.

Arsalan Amin1,2,3,4, Cory Janney1,2,3,4, Christopher Sheu1,2,3,4, Daniel C Jupiter1,2,3,4, Vinod K Panchbhavi1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries includes assessment of radiographs; however, there exist no agreed on standard diagnostic criteria. Previous studies lack consistency with radiographic evaluation methods. The dynamic nature of the ankle joint supports analyzing anatomical parameters using weight-bearing films to assess for tibiofibular syndesmotic integrity.
Methods: Weight-bearing tibiofibular syndesmosis radiographs of 39 male and 40 female patients were retrospectively analyzed by 3 investigators, at different levels of orthopaedic training. Measurements 1 cm above the tibial plafond for the anterior tibiofibular overlap (TFO) and tibiofibular clear space (TCS) were recorded and standardized by the fibular width (FW) at 2 time points. Data were compared to check for agreement between the sets of measurements for each rater and agreement between investigators, and to ascertain underlying gender differences.
Results: There was good intraobserver correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.90) among investigators for each parameter. A significant difference in the TFO was noted between genders (P < .05). We establish the following radiographic (anteroposterior view) parameters for an intact syndesmosis: male patients, TCS <4.57 mm or TCS/FW <29% and TFO >9.29 mm or TFO/FW > 57%; female patients, TCS <4.28 mm or TCS/FW <30% and TFO >7.41 mm or TFO/FW >51%. Conclusions: Our study provides a more objective approach by utilizing weight-bearing radiographs and performing all measurements 1 cm above the tibial plafond. Levels of Evidence: Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; statistical analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 29607668     DOI: 10.1177/1938640018766631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec        ISSN: 1938-6400


  4 in total

1.  Sagittal ankle position does not affect axial CT measurements of the syndesmosis in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  Ashley E Levack; Aleksey Dvorzhinskiy; Elizabeth B Gausden; Matthew R Garner; Stephen J Warner; Peter D Fabricant; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Radiographic parameters of the normal ankle syndesmosis: Comparison between hindfoot alignment view and anteroposterior view.

Authors:  Jaehyung Lee; Ho Seong Lee; Ji Wan Kim; Bum-Sik Lee; Youngrak Choi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 1.573

Review 3.  Which test is the best? An updated literature review of imaging modalities for acute ankle diastasis injuries.

Authors:  Nico Ng; James Randolph Onggo; Mithun Nambiar; Julian Tam Maingard; David Ng; Gaurav Gupta; Dee Nandurkar; Sina Babazadeh; Harvinder Bedi
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2022-05-03

4.  Diagnosis of tibiofibular syndesmosis instability in Weber type B malleolar fractures.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Yongxing Cao; Chonglin Yang; Xingchen Li; Yangbo Xu; Xiangyang Xu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.