Literature DB >> 29607491

Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Corina N Schoen1, Gabriele Saccone2, Sami Backley1, Evelien M Sandberg3, Ning Gu4, Shani Delaney5, Vincenzo Berghella6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Induction of labor is a common intervention. The objective was to investigate whether larger Foley catheter volumes for labor induction decrease the total time from induction to delivery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing larger single-balloon volumes (60-80 mL) during Foley catheter cervical ripening with usual volume (30 mL) in women undergoing labor induction were identified by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, PROSPERO, EMBASE, Scielo and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from inception through 2017. The primary outcome was mean time from induction to delivery in hours. Secondary outcomes included time from induction to vaginal delivery, delivery within 24 h, time to Foley expulsion, cesarean section, chorioamnionitis, epidural use, hemorrhage, meconium staining, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird (PROSPERO CRD42017058885).
RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials including 1432 singleton gestations were included in the systematic review. Women randomized to larger volumes of balloon had a significantly shorter time from induction to delivery (mean difference 1.97 h, 95% CI -3.88 to -0.06). There was no difference in cesarean section between groups (16 vs. 18%, relative risk 0.84, 95% CI 0.6-1.17). A larger balloon volume was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in time from induction to delivery in multiparous (mean difference 2.67 h, 95% CI -6.1 to 0.76) and nulliparous women (mean difference 1.82 h, 95% CI -4.16 to 0.53).
CONCLUSION: Balloon volumes larger than 30 mL during Foley catheter induction reduce total time to delivery by approximately 2 h.
© 2018 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical ripening; Foley balloon; Foley catheter; labor induction; volume

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29607491     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

Review 1.  Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction.

Authors:  Nicole Carlson; Jessica Ellis; Katie Page; Alexis Dunn Amore; Julia Phillippi
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hang Min Chia; Peng Chiong Tan; Sze Ping Tan; Mukhri Hamdan; Siti Zawiah Omar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 3.  Recent advances in the induction of labor.

Authors:  Anna Maria Marconi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-10-30

4.  Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chaoyue Wen; Xuemin Liu; Ying Wang; Jun Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Comparison of the myometrial transcriptome from singleton and twin pregnancies by RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Sarah Arrowsmith; Yongxiang Fang; Andrew Sharp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.